PANews reported on December 8th that Dunamu, the operating company of the South Korean cryptocurrency exchange Upbit, stated that it has frozen 2.6 billion won (approximately $1.77 million) worth of damaged assets. Upbit is proceeding with follow-up procedures to safely recover the frozen assets. Currently, Upbit is using its self-developed On-Chain Automated Tracking Service (OTS) to track the path of virtual assets transferred externally. Simultaneously, it is actively collaborating with global cryptocurrency exchanges to prevent further asset transfers. An Upbit representative stated, "While all of our clients' lost assets have been compensated by Upbit's own assets, we continue to relentlessly track and freeze assets to prevent them from falling into the hands of attackers. We urge global cryptocurrency exchanges and the blockchain community to actively cooperate in building a secure crypto asset ecosystem." Meanwhile, after replacing all virtual asset wallets and strengthening security measures, Upbit restored all virtual asset deposit and withdrawal services on the 6th. Previously, it was reported that Upbit confirmed that it suffered a loss of over 44.5 billion won due to the theft of its hot wallet, and the CEO issued an apology letter .PANews reported on December 8th that Dunamu, the operating company of the South Korean cryptocurrency exchange Upbit, stated that it has frozen 2.6 billion won (approximately $1.77 million) worth of damaged assets. Upbit is proceeding with follow-up procedures to safely recover the frozen assets. Currently, Upbit is using its self-developed On-Chain Automated Tracking Service (OTS) to track the path of virtual assets transferred externally. Simultaneously, it is actively collaborating with global cryptocurrency exchanges to prevent further asset transfers. An Upbit representative stated, "While all of our clients' lost assets have been compensated by Upbit's own assets, we continue to relentlessly track and freeze assets to prevent them from falling into the hands of attackers. We urge global cryptocurrency exchanges and the blockchain community to actively cooperate in building a secure crypto asset ecosystem." Meanwhile, after replacing all virtual asset wallets and strengthening security measures, Upbit restored all virtual asset deposit and withdrawal services on the 6th. Previously, it was reported that Upbit confirmed that it suffered a loss of over 44.5 billion won due to the theft of its hot wallet, and the CEO issued an apology letter .
Upbit: Approximately $1.77 million in damaged assets have been frozen, and the remaining stolen funds are being tracked.
PANews reported on December 8th that Dunamu, the operating company of the South Korean cryptocurrency exchange Upbit, stated that it has frozen 2.6 billion won (approximately $1.77 million) worth of damaged assets. Upbit is proceeding with follow-up procedures to safely recover the frozen assets. Currently, Upbit is using its self-developed On-Chain Automated Tracking Service (OTS) to track the path of virtual assets transferred externally. Simultaneously, it is actively collaborating with global cryptocurrency exchanges to prevent further asset transfers.
An Upbit representative stated, "While all of our clients' lost assets have been compensated by Upbit's own assets, we continue to relentlessly track and freeze assets to prevent them from falling into the hands of attackers. We urge global cryptocurrency exchanges and the blockchain community to actively cooperate in building a secure crypto asset ecosystem." Meanwhile, after replacing all virtual asset wallets and strengthening security measures, Upbit restored all virtual asset deposit and withdrawal services on the 6th.
Previously, it was reported that Upbit confirmed that it suffered a loss of over 44.5 billion won due to the theft of its hot wallet, and the CEO issued an apology letter .
Market Opportunity
1 Price(1)
$0.005713
$0.005713$0.005713
USD
1 (1) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
You May Also Like
Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny
The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
Forward Industries Bets Big on Solana With $4B Capital Plan
The firm has filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission to launch a $4 billion at-the-market (ATM) equity program, […] The post Forward Industries Bets Big on Solana With $4B Capital Plan appeared first on Coindoo.
Share
Coindoo2025/09/18 04:15
Coinbase Joins Ethereum Foundation to Back Open Intents Framework
Coinbase Payments has joined the Open Intents Framework as a core contributor, working alongside Ethereum Foundation and other major players. The initiative aims to simplify complex multi-chain interactions through automated solver technology. The post Coinbase Joins Ethereum Foundation to Back Open Intents Framework appeared first on Coinspeaker.
Share
Coinspeaker2025/09/18 02:43