Product feasibility is the gold standard for measuring the potential of crypto AI projects, but true decentralization is its holy grail. A few days ago, the Talus research report released by Messari, a top cypto research institution, prompted me to think more deeply. In the crypto AI sector, projects with core products already implemented are not rare; projects like Fetch and Olas are highly mature. However, the vast majority of them adopt a hybrid model of "off-chain computation + on-chain settlement." Because the logic of AI decision-making is not fully on-chain, the entire decision-making process is a "black box," and outsiders cannot verify whether the decision follows the preset logic. This is not true decentralization, nor is it true DeAI. True DeAI: AI on the entire blockchain Talus fills the gap in the DeAI infrastructure sector, transforming AI agents from black-box tools into a fully decentralized, on-chain verifiable, and on-chain-accountable independent economy. Talus's core concept is "full-chain AI," which means that the entire process of an AI agent—from logic and state to decision-making steps—is written into smart contracts and executed directly on the blockchain. Under this architecture, anyone can verify the historical behavior and decision-making path of the AI agent without needing to trust a third party. DeAI's Trilemma Similar to the classic blockchain trilemma, the DeAI field also faces a trilemma: the trade-off between decentralization, performance, and cost. Talus cannot eliminate this trilemma, but it cleverly balances the three based on its Nexus core framework. Decentralization requires all AI agent logic, state, and decisions to be fully on-chain. Pure on-chain execution of computationally intensive tasks can easily cause performance bottlenecks, especially in scenarios with multiple agents running concurrently. Talus is based on Nexus, the first self-developed full-chain AI agent framework. It anchors all the key behaviors of the AI agent (decision logic, workflow status, settlement results) on the chain and ensures that they are verifiable and free of black boxes through smart contract execution and recording on Sui. This is also why Talus chose Sui as its underlying chain: Sui's MoveVM supports parallel transaction processing and allows multiple AI agents to execute concurrently. Talus has found a viable path in the three-fold dilemma of the DeAI field, filling the gap in decentralized AI infrastructure to some extent, but the road to decentralization of AI agents is still long and arduous.Product feasibility is the gold standard for measuring the potential of crypto AI projects, but true decentralization is its holy grail. A few days ago, the Talus research report released by Messari, a top cypto research institution, prompted me to think more deeply. In the crypto AI sector, projects with core products already implemented are not rare; projects like Fetch and Olas are highly mature. However, the vast majority of them adopt a hybrid model of "off-chain computation + on-chain settlement." Because the logic of AI decision-making is not fully on-chain, the entire decision-making process is a "black box," and outsiders cannot verify whether the decision follows the preset logic. This is not true decentralization, nor is it true DeAI. True DeAI: AI on the entire blockchain Talus fills the gap in the DeAI infrastructure sector, transforming AI agents from black-box tools into a fully decentralized, on-chain verifiable, and on-chain-accountable independent economy. Talus's core concept is "full-chain AI," which means that the entire process of an AI agent—from logic and state to decision-making steps—is written into smart contracts and executed directly on the blockchain. Under this architecture, anyone can verify the historical behavior and decision-making path of the AI agent without needing to trust a third party. DeAI's Trilemma Similar to the classic blockchain trilemma, the DeAI field also faces a trilemma: the trade-off between decentralization, performance, and cost. Talus cannot eliminate this trilemma, but it cleverly balances the three based on its Nexus core framework. Decentralization requires all AI agent logic, state, and decisions to be fully on-chain. Pure on-chain execution of computationally intensive tasks can easily cause performance bottlenecks, especially in scenarios with multiple agents running concurrently. Talus is based on Nexus, the first self-developed full-chain AI agent framework. It anchors all the key behaviors of the AI agent (decision logic, workflow status, settlement results) on the chain and ensures that they are verifiable and free of black boxes through smart contract execution and recording on Sui. This is also why Talus chose Sui as its underlying chain: Sui's MoveVM supports parallel transaction processing and allows multiple AI agents to execute concurrently. Talus has found a viable path in the three-fold dilemma of the DeAI field, filling the gap in decentralized AI infrastructure to some extent, but the road to decentralization of AI agents is still long and arduous.

The true holy grail of DeAI: Talus's "full-chain" solution

2025/12/09 08:00

Product feasibility is the gold standard for measuring the potential of crypto AI projects, but true decentralization is its holy grail.

A few days ago, the Talus research report released by Messari, a top cypto research institution, prompted me to think more deeply.

In the crypto AI sector, projects with core products already implemented are not rare; projects like Fetch and Olas are highly mature. However, the vast majority of them adopt a hybrid model of "off-chain computation + on-chain settlement." Because the logic of AI decision-making is not fully on-chain, the entire decision-making process is a "black box," and outsiders cannot verify whether the decision follows the preset logic.

This is not true decentralization, nor is it true DeAI.

True DeAI: AI on the entire blockchain

Talus fills the gap in the DeAI infrastructure sector, transforming AI agents from black-box tools into a fully decentralized, on-chain verifiable, and on-chain-accountable independent economy.

Talus's core concept is "full-chain AI," which means that the entire process of an AI agent—from logic and state to decision-making steps—is written into smart contracts and executed directly on the blockchain. Under this architecture, anyone can verify the historical behavior and decision-making path of the AI agent without needing to trust a third party.

DeAI's Trilemma

Similar to the classic blockchain trilemma, the DeAI field also faces a trilemma: the trade-off between decentralization, performance, and cost. Talus cannot eliminate this trilemma, but it cleverly balances the three based on its Nexus core framework.

Decentralization requires all AI agent logic, state, and decisions to be fully on-chain. Pure on-chain execution of computationally intensive tasks can easily cause performance bottlenecks, especially in scenarios with multiple agents running concurrently.

Talus is based on Nexus, the first self-developed full-chain AI agent framework. It anchors all the key behaviors of the AI agent (decision logic, workflow status, settlement results) on the chain and ensures that they are verifiable and free of black boxes through smart contract execution and recording on Sui.

This is also why Talus chose Sui as its underlying chain: Sui's MoveVM supports parallel transaction processing and allows multiple AI agents to execute concurrently.

Talus has found a viable path in the three-fold dilemma of the DeAI field, filling the gap in decentralized AI infrastructure to some extent, but the road to decentralization of AI agents is still long and arduous.

Market Opportunity
Camelot Token Logo
Camelot Token Price(GRAIL)
$122.4
$122.4$122.4
-2.18%
USD
Camelot Token (GRAIL) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Octav Integrates Chainlink to Deliver Independent Onchain NAV for DeFi

Octav Integrates Chainlink to Deliver Independent Onchain NAV for DeFi

Octav integrates Chainlink oracles to deliver neutral on-chain NAV, restoring trust during volatile DeFi markets. October shocks exposed DeFi operating without
Share
Crypto News Flash2025/12/21 17:51
SEC Final Judgments on FTX Executives Filed

SEC Final Judgments on FTX Executives Filed

The SEC has filed proposed final consent judgments against former FTX executives. Key figures involved include Caroline Ellison, Gary Wang, and Nishad Singh.
Share
CoinLive2025/12/21 18:06
SHIB Price Drops as Leadership Concerns Grow

SHIB Price Drops as Leadership Concerns Grow

The post SHIB Price Drops as Leadership Concerns Grow appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Shiba Inu investors uneasy as Kusama’s silence fuels leadership concerns. SHIB slid 13% in three days, retracing from $0.00001484 to $0.00001305. Shibarium exploit and Kusama’s absence have weighed on investor trust. Shiba Inu investors are voicing concerns about the project’s long-term direction as leadership uncertainty and slow ecosystem progress erode confidence.  The token, which rallied from its meme-coin origins to become the second-largest meme asset by market cap, counts more than 1.5 million holders worldwide. But as SHIB matures, the gap between early hype and current delivery has widened.  The project’s transition into an “ecosystem coin” with spin-off projects and Shibarium, its layer-2 network, once raised expectations. Analysts now point to internal challenges as the main factor holding SHIB back from fulfilling that potential. Kusama’s Silence Adds to Instability Central to the debate is the role of Shytoshi Kusama, Shiba Inu’s pseudonymous lead developer. Investors are concerned about the intermittent disappearance of the project’s lead developer, who repeatedly takes unannounced social media breaks.  For instance, Kusama went silent on X for over a month before resurfacing this week amid growing speculation that he had abandoned the Shiba Inu project.  Kusama returned shortly after the Shibarium bridge suffered an exploit worth around $3 million. However, he did not directly address the issue but only reassured Shiba Inu community members of his commitment to advancing the project.  Although most community members didn’t complain about Kusama’s anonymity in the project’s initial stages, his recent behavior has raised concerns. Many are beginning to develop trust issues, particularly because nobody could reveal the SHIB developer’s identity for the past five years. He has conducted all communications under pseudonyms. SHIB Price Action Reflects Sentiment Shift Market reaction has mirrored the doubts. SHIB, which spiked 26% at the start of September, has since reversed. Over the last…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 04:13