TLDR: BTCUSD/Gold ratio suggests Bitcoin is undervalued compared to gold. Daily RSI below 30 shows historical cycle lows and potential bullish divergence. ExchangeTLDR: BTCUSD/Gold ratio suggests Bitcoin is undervalued compared to gold. Daily RSI below 30 shows historical cycle lows and potential bullish divergence. Exchange

Bitcoin Undervalued Against Gold as Technical and On-Chain Signals Diverge

TLDR:

  • BTCUSD/Gold ratio suggests Bitcoin is undervalued compared to gold.
  • Daily RSI below 30 shows historical cycle lows and potential bullish divergence.
  • Exchange reserves drop to 2.76M BTC, indicating reduced selling pressure.
  • Miner and whale activity shows controlled distribution amid consolidation.

Bitcoin market valuation is gaining renewed attention as analysts examine relative performance against gold and blockchain behavior. 

As December trading draws to a close, Bitcoin appears range-bound, while underlying signals suggest a mix of short-term accumulation and long-term distribution. 

Technical ratios, momentum indicators, and on-chain data are being analyzed to assess whether the current pricing reflects undervaluation or ongoing structural repositioning. 

Historical comparisons suggest Bitcoin could be trading below its fair value relative to gold, even as experienced holders manage exposure carefully.

Bitcoin-to-Gold Ratio Suggests Undervaluation

The Bitcoin market drew focus after Michaël van de Poppe highlighted the BTCUSD-to-gold ratio. 

He observed that previous Bitcoin cycle lows coincided with extremes in this ratio, appearing in 2015, 2018, and during the 2022 Luna-driven selloff. 

Such historical alignment indicates potential undervaluation relative to gold.

Van de Poppe argued that one asset is overvalued while the other is undervalued. In his assessment, gold has reached extended valuations, whereas Bitcoin trades below its historical equilibrium. This perspective emphasizes relative value rather than absolute price trends.

Momentum indicators support this view. Van de Poppe noted that daily RSI readings below 30 marked prior market lows. 

Currently, the RSI shows similar behavior, and a bullish divergence on the daily timeframe is forming, signaling weakening downside momentum and a potential short-term repricing window.

On-Chain Activity Shows Controlled Distribution

While technical ratios suggest potential undervaluation, on-chain data presents a more cautious Bitcoin market narrative. 

Cryptoquant analyst GugaOnChain reported that exchange reserves have declined to 2.76 million BTC, which reduces immediate selling pressure but also indicates coins are leaving exchanges.

Exchange inflows and outflows remain balanced, showing limited aggressive accumulation. Binary Coin Days Destroyed indicates long-term holder retention, while the 60-day CDD average signals older coins are being distributed. 

This pattern points to measured distribution rather than panic selling.

Miner and whale activity reinforces this nuanced picture. Miner reserves have declined structurally, confirming long-term distribution, while short-term outflows remain low. 

Whale metrics show elevated exchange concentration, declining holdings, and profit-taking among older whales. 

Together, these behaviors indicate that while Bitcoin may be relatively undervalued, experienced holders are managing exposure carefully within a broader distribution framework.

The post Bitcoin Undervalued Against Gold as Technical and On-Chain Signals Diverge appeared first on Blockonomi.

Market Opportunity
Bullish Degen Logo
Bullish Degen Price(BULLISH)
$0.01939
$0.01939$0.01939
-4.71%
USD
Bullish Degen (BULLISH) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
Forward Industries Bets Big on Solana With $4B Capital Plan

Forward Industries Bets Big on Solana With $4B Capital Plan

The firm has filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission to launch a $4 billion at-the-market (ATM) equity program, […] The post Forward Industries Bets Big on Solana With $4B Capital Plan appeared first on Coindoo.
Share
Coindoo2025/09/18 04:15
Coinbase Joins Ethereum Foundation to Back Open Intents Framework

Coinbase Joins Ethereum Foundation to Back Open Intents Framework

Coinbase Payments has joined the Open Intents Framework as a core contributor, working alongside Ethereum Foundation and other major players. The initiative aims to simplify complex multi-chain interactions through automated solver technology. The post Coinbase Joins Ethereum Foundation to Back Open Intents Framework appeared first on Coinspeaker.
Share
Coinspeaker2025/09/18 02:43