The post Why a Declining Bitcoin Hash Rate Could Actually Be Bullish appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Bitcoin’s (BTC) network hash rate has dropped 4% over The post Why a Declining Bitcoin Hash Rate Could Actually Be Bullish appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Bitcoin’s (BTC) network hash rate has dropped 4% over

Why a Declining Bitcoin Hash Rate Could Actually Be Bullish

Bitcoin’s (BTC) network hash rate has dropped 4% over the last 30 days, marking the sharpest decline in nearly 2 years.

At the same time, increased volatility and a decline in prices highlight mounting stress among miners as profits dwindle. However, according to investment management firm VanEck, the miner capitulation may signal a bottom.

Sponsored

Bitcoin Mining Power Falls as Price Weakness and China Shutdowns Hit Network

VanEck’s mid-December 2025 Bitcoin ChainCheck report highlighted that 4% dip in the network hashing power was the largest since April 2024. The contraction comes amid a difficult month for Bitcoin, with the price sliding around 9%.

Furthermore, volatility has spiked, pushing 30-day realized volatility above 45%, the highest level seen since April 2025.

Beyond price-related pressures, Bitcoin’s hash rate was also affected by developments in China. Last week, BeInCrypto reported that approximately 400,000 machines were forced offline in China’s Xinjiang province.

The shutdown eliminated an estimated 1.3 GW of capacity and had a sizeable impact on the network. China’s computing power dropped by around 100 exahashes per second within 24 hours.

Sponsored

Meanwhile, miner economics have also worsened due to Bitcoin’s price performance. According to VanEck, the breakeven electricity price on a 2022-era Bitmain S19 XP miner decreased from $0.12 in December 2024 to $0.077 by mid-December 2025, representing a 36% drop. Sigel and Bush added that,

Sponsored

Historical Data Signals Bullish Turn

Despite the recent pressure, VanEck noted that declining hash rate could be a “bullish contrarian signal.” Based on data since 2014, the report found that Bitcoin’s forward returns have tended to be stronger when the network hash rate is contracting.

The 90-day forward BTC returns were positive about 65% of the time when the hash rate had declined over the prior 30 days, compared with 54% during periods of rising hash rate.

In addition, average 180-day forward returns were slightly higher when the hash rate was falling, at approximately 20.5%, compared to about 20.2% when it was increasing. The pattern holds over the long term as well.

Sponsored

Technical Patterns Support Bottom Formation

On the technical front, market watchers have also been outlining potential bottom signals. Market analysts, including Ted Pillows, have identified a 3-day bullish divergence for Bitcoin, a pattern that marked market bottoms in its last two appearances.

Whether Bitcoin ultimately sees another move higher remains uncertain. For now, the leading cryptocurrency remains under pressure. BeInCrypto Markets data showed that Bitcoin was trading at $88,066 at press time, down 1.01% over the past 24 hours.

Source: https://beincrypto.com/bitcoin-miner-capitulation-hash-rate-bottom/

Market Opportunity
WHY Logo
WHY Price(WHY)
$0.00000001619
$0.00000001619$0.00000001619
+12.97%
USD
WHY (WHY) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Satoshi-Era Mt. Gox’s 1,000 Bitcoin Wallet Suddenly Reactivated

Satoshi-Era Mt. Gox’s 1,000 Bitcoin Wallet Suddenly Reactivated

The post Satoshi-Era Mt. Gox’s 1,000 Bitcoin Wallet Suddenly Reactivated appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. X account @SaniExp, which belongs to the founder of the Timechain Index explorer, has published data showing that a dormant BTC wallet was activated after hibernating for six years. However, it was set up 13 years ago, according to the tweet — the time when Satoshi Nakamoto’s shadow was still casting itself around, so to speak. The X post states that the tweet belongs to infamous early Bitcoin exchange Mt. Gox, which suffered from a major hack in the early 2010s, and last year it began paying out compensation to clients who lost their crypto in that hack. The deadline was eventually extended to October 2025. Mt. Gox’s wallet with 1,000 BTC reactivated The above-mentioned data source shared a screenshot from the Timechain Index explorer, showing multiple transactions marked as confirmed and moving a total of 1,000 Bitcoins. This amount of crypto is valued at $116,195,100 at the time of the initiated transaction. Last year, Mt. Gox began to move the remains of its gargantuan funds to pay out compensations to its creditors. Earlier this year, it also made several massive transactions to partner exchanges to distribute funds to Mt. Gox investors. All of the compensations were promised to be paid out by Oct. 31, 2025. The aforementioned transaction is likely preparation for another payout. The exchange was hacked for several years due to multiple unnoticed security breaches, and in 2014, when the site went offline, 744,408 Bitcoins were reported stolen. Source: https://u.today/satoshi-era-mtgoxs-1000-bitcoin-wallet-suddenly-reactivated
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 10:18
lessons from Malta’s Papaya case

lessons from Malta’s Papaya case

The post lessons from Malta’s Papaya case appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. SPONSORED POST* Standfirst: In August 2025, Malta became the unlikely stage for a clash between a fintech firm and one of the island’s most powerful newspapers. Papaya Ltd’s response – measured, legalistic, and paired with concrete operational moves, now stands as a case study in how financial institutions can build resilience under pressure. Drawing on the joint expertise of Lincoln’s Inn barrister (UK)  Hamna Zain and former Deutsche Bank professional Davor Zilic (croatian fintech specialist), this article examines what happened, and what it tells us about the uneasy balance between law, journalism and finance. In early August 2025, Papaya Ltd – a licensed Maltese electronic money institution (EMI), found itself in the eye of a media storm. The Times of Malta, the country’s largest daily, sent the company a list of probing questions which, Papaya argued, would have forced it to reveal confidential information from a 2021 compliance audit. The firm turned to the courts, asking for a temporary injunction to prevent publication. A judge granted a temporary protective measure pending a full hearing on its request for an injunction, that blocked the newspaper from publishing an as-yet-unwritten article about the company. The request for a substantive injunction was ultimately refused on 12 August. This legal action, triggered after one of the newspaper’s journalists sent questions to Papaya, prompted heated debate about press freedom, censorship, and the responsibilities of both media and financial firms. The headlines were immediate and emotive. “Times of Malta hit by court ‘gagging order’ from e-money firm”. “We’ve been gagged. This is why it matters.” For days, the injunction was portrayed as an assault on press freedom. The newspaper itself argued that “preventing a journalist from publishing a story is recognised in all democratic countries as illegal and a violation of the journalist’s fundamental right to…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/20 23:05
Ripple CTO Explains How The XRP Ledger ‘Will Take Over The World’

Ripple CTO Explains How The XRP Ledger ‘Will Take Over The World’

On a Token Relations webinar for the XRP ecosystem on Dec. 20, Ripple CTO David Schwartz was asked the sort of question that usually produces a tidy dashboard answer
Share
Bitcoinist2025/12/24 06:00