The post Malicious worm compromises crypto domains in supply-chain attack appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. On Nov. 24, security firm Aikido detected a second wave of the Shai-Hulud self-replicating npm worm, compromising 492 packages with a combined 132 million monthly downloads. The attack struck major ecosystems, including AsyncAPI, PostHog, Postman, Zapier, and ENS, exploiting the final weeks before npm’s Dec. 9 deadline to revoke legacy authentication tokens. Aikido’s triage queue flagged the intrusion around 3:16 AM UTC, as malicious versions of AsyncAPI’s go-template and 36 related packages began spreading across the registry. The attacker labeled stolen-credential repositories with the description “Sha1-Hulud: The Second Coming,” maintaining theatrical branding from the September campaign. The worm installs the Bun runtime during package setup, then executes malicious code that searches developer environments for exposed secrets using TruffleHog. Compromised API keys, GitHub tokens, and npm credentials are published to randomly named public repositories, and the malware attempts to propagate by pushing new infected versions to up to 100 additional packages, five times the scale of the September attack. Technical evolution and destructive payload The November iteration introduces several modifications from the September attack.The malware now creates repositories with randomly generated names for stolen data rather than using hardcoded names, complicating takedown efforts. Setup code installs Bun via setup_bun.js before executing the primary payload in bun_environment.js, which contains the worm logic and credential-exfiltration routines. The most destructive addition: if the malware cannot authenticate with GitHub or npm using stolen credentials, it wipes all files in the user’s home directory. Aikido’s analysis revealed execution errors that limited the attack’s spread. The bundling code that copies the full worm into new packages sometimes fails to include bun_environment.js, leaving only the Bun installation script without the malicious payload. Despite these failures, the initial compromises hit high-value targets with massive downstream exposure. AsyncAPI packages dominated the first wave, with 36 compromised releases including @asyncapi/cli, @asyncapi/parser,… The post Malicious worm compromises crypto domains in supply-chain attack appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. On Nov. 24, security firm Aikido detected a second wave of the Shai-Hulud self-replicating npm worm, compromising 492 packages with a combined 132 million monthly downloads. The attack struck major ecosystems, including AsyncAPI, PostHog, Postman, Zapier, and ENS, exploiting the final weeks before npm’s Dec. 9 deadline to revoke legacy authentication tokens. Aikido’s triage queue flagged the intrusion around 3:16 AM UTC, as malicious versions of AsyncAPI’s go-template and 36 related packages began spreading across the registry. The attacker labeled stolen-credential repositories with the description “Sha1-Hulud: The Second Coming,” maintaining theatrical branding from the September campaign. The worm installs the Bun runtime during package setup, then executes malicious code that searches developer environments for exposed secrets using TruffleHog. Compromised API keys, GitHub tokens, and npm credentials are published to randomly named public repositories, and the malware attempts to propagate by pushing new infected versions to up to 100 additional packages, five times the scale of the September attack. Technical evolution and destructive payload The November iteration introduces several modifications from the September attack.The malware now creates repositories with randomly generated names for stolen data rather than using hardcoded names, complicating takedown efforts. Setup code installs Bun via setup_bun.js before executing the primary payload in bun_environment.js, which contains the worm logic and credential-exfiltration routines. The most destructive addition: if the malware cannot authenticate with GitHub or npm using stolen credentials, it wipes all files in the user’s home directory. Aikido’s analysis revealed execution errors that limited the attack’s spread. The bundling code that copies the full worm into new packages sometimes fails to include bun_environment.js, leaving only the Bun installation script without the malicious payload. Despite these failures, the initial compromises hit high-value targets with massive downstream exposure. AsyncAPI packages dominated the first wave, with 36 compromised releases including @asyncapi/cli, @asyncapi/parser,…

Malicious worm compromises crypto domains in supply-chain attack

On Nov. 24, security firm Aikido detected a second wave of the Shai-Hulud self-replicating npm worm, compromising 492 packages with a combined 132 million monthly downloads.

The attack struck major ecosystems, including AsyncAPI, PostHog, Postman, Zapier, and ENS, exploiting the final weeks before npm’s Dec. 9 deadline to revoke legacy authentication tokens.

Aikido’s triage queue flagged the intrusion around 3:16 AM UTC, as malicious versions of AsyncAPI’s go-template and 36 related packages began spreading across the registry.

The attacker labeled stolen-credential repositories with the description “Sha1-Hulud: The Second Coming,” maintaining theatrical branding from the September campaign.

The worm installs the Bun runtime during package setup, then executes malicious code that searches developer environments for exposed secrets using TruffleHog.

Compromised API keys, GitHub tokens, and npm credentials are published to randomly named public repositories, and the malware attempts to propagate by pushing new infected versions to up to 100 additional packages, five times the scale of the September attack.

Technical evolution and destructive payload

The November iteration introduces several modifications from the September attack.
The malware now creates repositories with randomly generated names for stolen data rather than using hardcoded names, complicating takedown efforts.

Setup code installs Bun via setup_bun.js before executing the primary payload in bun_environment.js, which contains the worm logic and credential-exfiltration routines.

The most destructive addition: if the malware cannot authenticate with GitHub or npm using stolen credentials, it wipes all files in the user’s home directory.

Aikido’s analysis revealed execution errors that limited the attack’s spread. The bundling code that copies the full worm into new packages sometimes fails to include bun_environment.js, leaving only the Bun installation script without the malicious payload.

Despite these failures, the initial compromises hit high-value targets with massive downstream exposure.

AsyncAPI packages dominated the first wave, with 36 compromised releases including @asyncapi/cli, @asyncapi/parser, and @asyncapi/generator.

PostHog followed at 4:11 AM UTC, with infected versions of posthog-js, posthog-node, and dozens of plugins. Postman packages arrived at 5:09 AM UTC.

The Zapier compromise affected @zapier/zapier-sdk, zapier-platform-cli, and zapier-platform-core, while the ENS compromise affected @ensdomains/ensjs, @ensdomains/ens-contracts, and ethereum-ens.

GitHub branch creation suggests repository-level access

The AsyncAPI team discovered a malicious branch in their CLI repository created immediately before the compromised packages appeared on npm.

The branch contained a deployed version of the Shai-Hulud malware, indicating the attacker gained write access to the repository itself rather than simply hijacking npm tokens.

This escalation mirrors the technique used in the original Nx compromise, in which attackers modified source repositories to inject malicious code into legitimate build pipelines.

Aikido estimates that 26,300 GitHub repositories now contain stolen credentials marked with the “Sha1-Hulud: The Second Coming” description.

The repositories contain secrets exposed by developer environments that ran the compromised packages, including cloud service credentials, CI/CD tokens, and authentication keys for third-party APIs.

The public nature of the leaks amplifies the damage: any attacker monitoring the repositories can harvest credentials in real time and launch secondary attacks.

Attack timing and mitigation

The timing coincides with npm’s Nov. 15 announcement that it will revoke classic authentication tokens on Dec. 9.

The attacker’s choice to launch a final large-scale campaign before the deadline suggests they recognized the window for token-based compromises was closing. Aikido’s timeline shows the first Shai-Hulud wave began Sept. 16.

The Nov. 24 “Second Coming” represents the attacker’s last opportunity to exploit legacy tokens before npm’s migration cuts off that access.

Aikido recommends that security teams audit all dependencies from affected ecosystems, particularly the Zapier, ENS, AsyncAPI, PostHog, and Postman packages installed or updated after Nov. 24.

Organizations should rotate all GitHub, npm, cloud, and CI/CD secrets used in environments where these packages were present, and search GitHub for repositories with the “Sha1-Hulud: The Second Coming” description to determine if internal credentials were exposed.

Disabling npm postinstall scripts in CI pipelines prevents future install-time execution, and pinning package versions with lock files limits exposure to newly compromised releases.

Source: https://cryptoslate.com/malicious-worm-compromises-crypto-domains-in-supply-chain-attack/

Market Opportunity
Major Logo
Major Price(MAJOR)
$0.11173
$0.11173$0.11173
+1.20%
USD
Major (MAJOR) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Husky Inu (HINU) Completes Move To $0.00020688

Husky Inu (HINU) Completes Move To $0.00020688

Husky Inu (HINU) has completed its latest price jump, rising from $0.00020628 to $0.00020688. The price jump is part of the project’s pre-launch phase, which began on April 1, 2025.
Share
Cryptodaily2025/09/18 01:10
Stellar price forecast: XLM stays below $0.22 as bearish momentum remains

Stellar price forecast: XLM stays below $0.22 as bearish momentum remains

Key takeaways XLM is down by less than 1% and is trading below $0.22. The coin could retest the $0.20 support level if the bearish trend continues.  The cryptocurrency
Share
Coin Journal2025/12/25 15:41
Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

The post Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Jordan Love and the Green Bay Packers are off to a 2-0 start. Getty Images The Green Bay Packers are, once again, one of the NFL’s better teams. The Cleveland Browns are, once again, one of the league’s doormats. It’s why unbeaten Green Bay (2-0) is a 8-point favorite at winless Cleveland (0-2) Sunday according to betmgm.com. The money line is also Green Bay -500. Most expect this to be a Packers’ rout, and it very well could be. But Green Bay knows taking anyone in this league for granted can prove costly. “I think if you look at their roster, the paper, who they have on that team, what they can do, they got a lot of talent and things can turn around quickly for them,” Packers safety Xavier McKinney said. “We just got to kind of keep that in mind and know we not just walking into something and they just going to lay down. That’s not what they going to do.” The Browns certainly haven’t laid down on defense. Far from. Cleveland is allowing an NFL-best 191.5 yards per game. The Browns gave up 141 yards to Cincinnati in Week 1, including just seven in the second half, but still lost, 17-16. Cleveland has given up an NFL-best 45.5 rushing yards per game and just 2.1 rushing yards per attempt. “The biggest thing is our defensive line is much, much improved over last year and I think we’ve got back to our personality,” defensive coordinator Jim Schwartz said recently. “When we play our best, our D-line leads us there as our engine.” The Browns rank third in the league in passing defense, allowing just 146.0 yards per game. Cleveland has also gone 30 straight games without allowing a 300-yard passer, the longest active streak in the NFL.…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:41