The post Meta eyes stablecoin reboot via partners like Stripe appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. What Meta plans: stablecoin re-entry via partners, not launchedThe post Meta eyes stablecoin reboot via partners like Stripe appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. What Meta plans: stablecoin re-entry via partners, not launched

Meta eyes stablecoin reboot via partners like Stripe

What Meta plans: stablecoin re-entry via partners, not launched yet

Meta has not launched a stablecoin. According to AInvest, the company is exploring a partner-led path for a potential rollout rather than introducing its own token.

As reported by CryptoBriefing, the shift toward third-party partnerships is designed to mitigate regulatory risk by relying on existing stablecoin infrastructure and compliance programs.

Multiple outlets have described a re-entry effort, but official product details, exact timing, and supported assets remain unannounced.

Why it matters: regulation, privacy, and Big Tech restrictions

Libra/Diem faltered amid concerns over monetary policy, systemic risk, and user data access, as reported by Fortune. Those same fault lines will shape any Meta-linked stablecoin effort.

Proposed U.S. stablecoin legislation such as the genius act would tighten issuer standards via reserves and audits, but how those rules treat Big Tech involvement remains unsettled, according to Coindoo.

Before any launch, policymakers are signaling constraints on platform power. As reported by CoinDesk, Senator Elizabeth Warren said, “another attempt to control the American people’s money,” underscoring her push to bar Big Tech from stablecoin issuance or close affiliation.

BingX: a trusted exchange delivering real advantages for traders at every level.

What changes now for users, apps, and payments

No immediate changes are expected for users. PaymentsJournal cites Javelin Strategy & Research’s Joel Hugentobler noting a more receptive climate and the likelihood that Meta partners with issuers like Circle’s USDC or stays stablecoin‑agnostic.

If implemented, in‑app flows could reduce settlement friction and costs, but data-use controls, consent, and KYC/AML processes would be scrutinized and likely handled by licensed partners.

At the time of this writing, PayPal (PYPL) recently traded around $41–$42 in recent sessions, based on data from Nasdaq, providing neutral context for the broader digital payments landscape.

Timeline, partners, and open questions to watch

As reported by BitcoinWorld, Meta is linked to a partner-first model that could include third-party processors such as Stripe, with some reports pointing to a potential H2 2025 window.

Timeline and date uncertainty across reports

According to BreakingTheNews, Meta is considering a re-entry in the second half of this year.

As reported by Bitget, Meta circulated a request for proposal and is exploring a relaunch in h2 of this year.

Whalesbook has indicated the target could extend to the second half of 2026.

What changed since Diem/Libra and Novi

The prior strategy centered on issuing a proprietary token; the current approach would externalize reserve management, audits, and transaction monitoring to regulated issuers and processors.

Meta’s role would more likely focus on front-end integration and distribution, with core financial compliance functions executed by licensed partners.

Reports favor partnering with existing stablecoins through third-party processors. Final product decisions remain undisclosed.

How could proposed U.S. stablecoin laws and Senator Warren’s Big Tech restrictions impact Meta’s plans?

Laws could permit compliant issuers yet restrict Big Tech affiliations. The outcome depends on final statutory language and enforcement.

Source: https://coincu.com/news/meta-eyes-stablecoin-reboot-via-partners-like-stripe/

Market Opportunity
Octavia Logo
Octavia Price(VIA)
$0.0014999
$0.0014999$0.0014999
0.00%
USD
Octavia (VIA) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
MYX Finance price surges again as funding rate points to a crash

MYX Finance price surges again as funding rate points to a crash

MYX Finance price went parabolic again as the recent short-squeeze resumed. However, the formation of a double-top pattern and the funding rate point to an eventual crash in the coming days. MYX Finance (MYX) came in the spotlight earlier this…
Share
Crypto.news2025/09/18 02:57
Trump enlists GOP to translate his conspiracy theories into new action

Trump enlists GOP to translate his conspiracy theories into new action

President Donald Trump will deliver his "State of the Union" address on Tuesday and is expected to bring up some of his election conspiracies before calling on
Share
Alternet2026/02/25 04:52