Uniswap dominates DeFi with over a billion in yearly fees, while Labs adds tens of millions more.Uniswap dominates DeFi with over a billion in yearly fees, while Labs adds tens of millions more.

UNI Crypto: With a $5.7B Market Cap, Investors Question Token Utility Amid Soaring Protocol Revenues

2025/09/25 04:20
Uniswap Price Consolidates Near $9.57 as Buyers Test Recovery Momentum

Yet none of this revenue reaches token holders, leaving the token’s $5.7B market cap driven mostly by governance weight rather than real value capture.

Price Struggles to Reflect Protocol Strength

In a recent X post, market analyst Clemente highlighted the growing disconnect between Uniswap’s massive protocol revenue and the token’s stagnant value. While the asset Labs reportedly brings in $50 million per year and the protocol itself generates an eye-popping $1.65 billion in fees annually, none of this revenue directly accrues to the token holders.

With the token trading at $9.11 and carrying a $5.7 billion market cap, the lack of value capture has sparked heated discussions across the community.

Price Struggles to Reflect Protocol Strength

Source: X

The core issue stems from the asset’s design as a governance token, rather than a direct claim on the protocol’s cash flows.

This structure allows holders to vote on proposals but does little to reward them financially, leaving many to question whether governance utility alone justifies the asset’s multi-billion-dollar valuation. Without a clear buyback, burn, or dividend mechanism, the token risks being overshadowed by other DeFi tokens that tie revenues more directly to holders.

Price Action Highlights the Disconnect

Supporting analyst view, BraveNewCoin data show Uniswap trading at $7.90, down -2.58% in the last 24 hours. The token carries a $4.74 billion market cap, with daily trading volume at $223.6 million and a circulating supply of just over 600 million.

Price Action Highlights the Disconnect

Source: BraveNewCoin

Despite the protocol’s enormous fee generation, price action suggests investors remain cautious, as the asset continues to lag behind the platform’s financial strength.

This steady underperformance underscores the ongoing debate about its role in the ecosystem. While the underlying protocol thrives, the lack of direct value capture weighs on sentiment.

Bearish Momentum Persists Despite Signs of Stabilization

At the time of writing, UNI is trading at $8.12, a modest 0.72% uptick on the day after weeks of volatility that pushed the asset from highs of $12.29 down to lows of $4.55.

Despite this slight recovery, the broader short-term outlook remains bearish, as the token is still retracing heavily from its August peak. The pullback highlights sellers’ dominance, though the latest price action suggests the market may be attempting to stabilize.

Bearish Momentum Persists Despite Signs of Stabilization

Source: TradingView

Momentum indicators reinforce this cautious picture. The MACD remains negative, with both the line and signal below zero, pointing to persistent bearish control, while the histogram indicates fading strength in selling pressure as the gap narrows.

Meanwhile, the RVI sits at 46.42, below its moving average of 49.77, signaling that sentiment leans bearish but not in oversold territory. This leaves room for either further downside if pressure continues or a potential shift toward consolidation if buyers step in to defend current levels.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Google's AP2 protocol has been released. Does encrypted AI still have a chance?

Google's AP2 protocol has been released. Does encrypted AI still have a chance?

Following the MCP and A2A protocols, the AI Agent market has seen another blockbuster arrival: the Agent Payments Protocol (AP2), developed by Google. This will clearly further enhance AI Agents' autonomous multi-tasking capabilities, but the unfortunate reality is that it has little to do with web3AI. Let's take a closer look: What problem does AP2 solve? Simply put, the MCP protocol is like a universal hook, enabling AI agents to connect to various external tools and data sources; A2A is a team collaboration communication protocol that allows multiple AI agents to cooperate with each other to complete complex tasks; AP2 completes the last piece of the puzzle - payment capability. In other words, MCP opens up connectivity, A2A promotes collaboration efficiency, and AP2 achieves value exchange. The arrival of AP2 truly injects "soul" into the autonomous collaboration and task execution of Multi-Agents. Imagine AI Agents connecting Qunar, Meituan, and Didi to complete the booking of flights, hotels, and car rentals, but then getting stuck at the point of "self-payment." What's the point of all that multitasking? So, remember this: AP2 is an extension of MCP+A2A, solving the last mile problem of AI Agent automated execution. What are the technical highlights of AP2? The core innovation of AP2 is the Mandates mechanism, which is divided into real-time authorization mode and delegated authorization mode. Real-time authorization is easy to understand. The AI Agent finds the product and shows it to you. The operation can only be performed after the user signs. Delegated authorization requires the user to set rules in advance, such as only buying the iPhone 17 when the price drops to 5,000. The AI Agent monitors the trigger conditions and executes automatically. The implementation logic is cryptographically signed using Verifiable Credentials (VCs). Users can set complex commission conditions, including price ranges, time limits, and payment method priorities, forming a tamper-proof digital contract. Once signed, the AI Agent executes according to the conditions, with VCs ensuring auditability and security at every step. Of particular note is the "A2A x402" extension, a technical component developed by Google specifically for crypto payments, developed in collaboration with Coinbase and the Ethereum Foundation. This extension enables AI Agents to seamlessly process stablecoins, ETH, and other blockchain assets, supporting native payment scenarios within the Web3 ecosystem. What kind of imagination space can AP2 bring? After analyzing the technical principles, do you think that's it? Yes, in fact, the AP2 is boring when it is disassembled alone. Its real charm lies in connecting and opening up the "MCP+A2A+AP2" technology stack, completely opening up the complete link of AI Agent's autonomous analysis+execution+payment. From now on, AI Agents can open up many application scenarios. For example, AI Agents for stock investment and financial management can help us monitor the market 24/7 and conduct independent transactions. Enterprise procurement AI Agents can automatically replenish and renew without human intervention. AP2's complementary payment capabilities will further expand the penetration of the Agent-to-Agent economy into more scenarios. Google obviously understands that after the technical framework is established, the ecological implementation must be relied upon, so it has brought in more than 60 partners to develop it, almost covering the entire payment and business ecosystem. Interestingly, it also involves major Crypto players such as Ethereum, Coinbase, MetaMask, and Sui. Combined with the current trend of currency and stock integration, the imagination space has been doubled. Is web3 AI really dead? Not entirely. Google's AP2 looks complete, but it only achieves technical compatibility with Crypto payments. It can only be regarded as an extension of the traditional authorization framework and belongs to the category of automated execution. There is a "paradigm" difference between it and the autonomous asset management pursued by pure Crypto native solutions. The Crypto-native solutions under exploration are taking the "decentralized custody + on-chain verification" route, including AI Agent autonomous asset management, AI Agent autonomous transactions (DeFAI), AI Agent digital identity and on-chain reputation system (ERC-8004...), AI Agent on-chain governance DAO framework, AI Agent NPC and digital avatars, and many other interesting and fun directions. Ultimately, once users get used to AI Agent payments in traditional fields, their acceptance of AI Agents autonomously owning digital assets will also increase. And for those scenarios that AP2 cannot reach, such as anonymous transactions, censorship-resistant payments, and decentralized asset management, there will always be a time for crypto-native solutions to show their strength? The two are more likely to be complementary rather than competitive, but to be honest, the key technological advancements behind AI Agents currently all come from web2AI, and web3AI still needs to keep up the good work!
Share
PANews2025/09/18 07:00