The post Philippines orders Tools for Humanity to halt data processing appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Homepage > News > Business > Philippines orders Tools for Humanity to halt data processing The National Privacy Commission (NPC) of the Philippines has ordered Tools for Humanity (TFH), the company behind World App and the Orb verification system, to stop all personal data processing operations in the Philippines after finding violations of the Data Privacy Act of 2012 (DPA) and its implementing rules. In a Cease and Desist Order (CDO) issued on October 8, the NPC directed TFH to “immediately stop all personal data processing activities related to the World App, Orb verification, and all associated systems and platforms in the Philippines, including the collection and processing of biometric data such as iris scans.” The order followed an investigation by the NPC’s Complaints and Investigation Division, which found that TFH’s practices “did not adhere with the General Data Privacy Principles and violated the Rights of Data Subjects under the DPA.” Invalid consent and undue influence In its decision, the NPC stated that TFH obtained invalid consent from individuals who were offered cash incentives for their iris scans. Offering money in exchange for biometric data, the NPC said, “constituted undue influence,” making consent “not freely given, and therefore invalid” under the DPA. “When consent is compromised by the lure of compensation, it ceases to be a genuine expression of choice,” Jose Amelito Belarmino II, NPC’s Deputy Privacy Commissioner, said in a statement. “This Cease and Desist Order sends a clear message that the NPC will not tolerate practices that exploit socioeconomic vulnerabilities or compromise fundamental data privacy rights in pursuit of business objectives.” The Commission said TFH’s model of providing financial rewards and referrals in exchange for iris scans breached the law’s requirement for voluntary and informed consent. Back to the top ↑ Lack of transparency and excessive data collection… The post Philippines orders Tools for Humanity to halt data processing appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Homepage > News > Business > Philippines orders Tools for Humanity to halt data processing The National Privacy Commission (NPC) of the Philippines has ordered Tools for Humanity (TFH), the company behind World App and the Orb verification system, to stop all personal data processing operations in the Philippines after finding violations of the Data Privacy Act of 2012 (DPA) and its implementing rules. In a Cease and Desist Order (CDO) issued on October 8, the NPC directed TFH to “immediately stop all personal data processing activities related to the World App, Orb verification, and all associated systems and platforms in the Philippines, including the collection and processing of biometric data such as iris scans.” The order followed an investigation by the NPC’s Complaints and Investigation Division, which found that TFH’s practices “did not adhere with the General Data Privacy Principles and violated the Rights of Data Subjects under the DPA.” Invalid consent and undue influence In its decision, the NPC stated that TFH obtained invalid consent from individuals who were offered cash incentives for their iris scans. Offering money in exchange for biometric data, the NPC said, “constituted undue influence,” making consent “not freely given, and therefore invalid” under the DPA. “When consent is compromised by the lure of compensation, it ceases to be a genuine expression of choice,” Jose Amelito Belarmino II, NPC’s Deputy Privacy Commissioner, said in a statement. “This Cease and Desist Order sends a clear message that the NPC will not tolerate practices that exploit socioeconomic vulnerabilities or compromise fundamental data privacy rights in pursuit of business objectives.” The Commission said TFH’s model of providing financial rewards and referrals in exchange for iris scans breached the law’s requirement for voluntary and informed consent. Back to the top ↑ Lack of transparency and excessive data collection…

Philippines orders Tools for Humanity to halt data processing

2025/10/21 09:03

The National Privacy Commission (NPC) of the Philippines has ordered Tools for Humanity (TFH), the company behind World App and the Orb verification system, to stop all personal data processing operations in the Philippines after finding violations of the Data Privacy Act of 2012 (DPA) and its implementing rules.

In a Cease and Desist Order (CDO) issued on October 8, the NPC directed TFH to “immediately stop all personal data processing activities related to the World App, Orb verification, and all associated systems and platforms in the Philippines, including the collection and processing of biometric data such as iris scans.”

The order followed an investigation by the NPC’s Complaints and Investigation Division, which found that TFH’s practices “did not adhere with the General Data Privacy Principles and violated the Rights of Data Subjects under the DPA.”

In its decision, the NPC stated that TFH obtained invalid consent from individuals who were offered cash incentives for their iris scans. Offering money in exchange for biometric data, the NPC said, “constituted undue influence,” making consent “not freely given, and therefore invalid” under the DPA.

“When consent is compromised by the lure of compensation, it ceases to be a genuine expression of choice,” Jose Amelito Belarmino II, NPC’s Deputy Privacy Commissioner, said in a statement. “This Cease and Desist Order sends a clear message that the NPC will not tolerate practices that exploit socioeconomic vulnerabilities or compromise fundamental data privacy rights in pursuit of business objectives.”

The Commission said TFH’s model of providing financial rewards and referrals in exchange for iris scans breached the law’s requirement for voluntary and informed consent.

Back to the top ↑

Lack of transparency and excessive data collection

The NPC found that TFH “failed to adequately inform data subjects of the purpose, scope, extent, and duration of data processing” in its privacy notice. It said this violated the principle of transparency and the right to be informed.

It also ruled that the collection of immutable biometric identifiers, such as iris patterns, was “excessive and not necessary” for TFH’s stated goal of providing “proof of humanity.” The Commission said continued collection “exposes Filipino data subjects to serious and lifelong risks, including identity theft, fraud, and reputational harm.”

According to the NPC, “the nature of biometric data makes any unauthorized processing irreversible and enduring.”

The agency also cited privacy-related halts to TFH’s operations in Kenya and Hong Kong. “TFH, despite the challenges faced in various jurisdictions, failed to exercise due diligence in complying with the DPA,” it said.

Back to the top ↑

NPC: Biometric integrity is non-negotiable

Belarmino emphasized that protecting Filipinos’ biometric information is central to the NPC’s mandate. “The integrity of a Filipino citizen’s biometric data is non-negotiable, as it is a unique and permanent identifier,” he said.

The NPC said that while it supports technological innovation, it “remains steadfast in its mission to uphold the rights of data subjects, enforce the DPA, and ensure accountability among all personal information controllers and processors operating in the Philippines.”

“The promise of technology must never come at the expense of human dignity and data protection,” it added.

Guidance for the public

The NPC reminded Filipinos to stay cautious when asked for biometric information. Before giving consent, individuals should know “who is collecting their data, how it will be used, and whether proper safeguards are in place.”

The agency reiterated that its power to issue a Cease and Desist Order is granted under Section 7 of the DPA and reinforced by Section 9 of its Implementing Rules and NPC Circular 2020-02.

Back to the top ↑

DICT interest and sector response

The NPC’s move came as the Department of Information and Communications Technology (DICT) expressed interest in exploring iris-scan technology for banking and government systems.

On the same day, Belarmino announced the CDO local media ABS-CBN reported that DICT Secretary Henry Aguda stated that the technology could help ensure that beneficiaries of government aid are verified through biometrics.

However, two local IT organizations, namely the National Association of Data Protection Officers of the Philippines (NADPOP) and the Philippine Computer Emergency Response Team (PH-CERT), have expressed support for the NPC’s decision.

Tools for Humanity’s statement

Tools for Humanity responded in a blog post, saying it had “complied with all applicable laws in the Philippines, worked with regulators and formally registered with the National Privacy Commission.”

The company said Filipinos have already secured their anonymous, proof-of-human-verification, or World ID. TFH stated that Orb devices do not store biometric data. It said that when a person’s eyes are scanned, the images are processed and sent only to the user’s smartphone, while photos are deleted after verification, leaving only a cryptographic proof. The company asserted that it does not buy or sell user data and that people can use its network without undergoing iris scanning.

Global scrutiny over iris-scan systems

Worldcoin, co-founded by Sam Altman, Alex Blania, and Max Novendstern in 2019, has faced privacy investigations in several countries. It has been banned in Kenya, Spain, Germany, and Hong Kong, while India, South Korea, and Colombia have issued warnings.

Earlier this year, the NPC had already cautioned Filipinos against submitting to iris scans, warning of risks associated with storing biometric data. Biometric identifiers are unique and permanent, unlike passwords that can be reset. If compromised, they could be used for identity theft, surveillance, or impersonation.

With the new CDO, the Philippines joins countries taking a firmer stance against the collection of biometric data without clear safeguards. “Data privacy is a fundamental right, and that innovations involving personal data such as biometric data, must operate within the bounds of lawful, fair, and transparent processing,” the NPC said.

Back to the top ↑

Watch: Philippine ingenuity sparks green innovation at Shell LiveWire 2025

title=”YouTube video player” frameborder=”0″ allow=”accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share” referrerpolicy=”strict-origin-when-cross-origin” allowfullscreen=””>

Source: https://coingeek.com/philippines-orders-tools-for-humanity-to-halt-data-processing/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Zcash (ZEC) Rips While Bitcoin Dips — Can This Privacy Coin Run 49% Higher

Zcash (ZEC) Rips While Bitcoin Dips — Can This Privacy Coin Run 49% Higher

Zcash has seen a strong surge in recent weeks as demand for privacy coins grows across the market. ZEC’s rise stands out due to its limited correlation with Bitcoin, allowing it to perform independently during periods of volatility.  This unique behavior has fueled renewed interest and helped strengthen ZEC’s upward momentum. Zcash Is Independent Zcash’s correlation with Bitcoin currently sits at -0.78, signaling a strong negative relationship. This means ZEC is moving in the opposite direction of BTC, which is highly beneficial at a time when Bitcoin is trading near $90,000 after several days of decline. ZEC’s ability to decouple from BTC enables it to avoid broader market pullbacks. This negative correlation has remained intact since early November, reinforcing ZEC’s resilience. As long as the correlation stays below zero, Zcash will be less vulnerable to Bitcoin-driven sell-offs.  Want more token insights like this? Sign up for Editor Harsh Notariya’s Daily Crypto Newsletter here. ZEC Correlation With Bitcoin. Source: TradingView Macro indicators also suggest favorable conditions. Zcash’s liquidation map reveals that short sellers should approach the market with caution. If ZEC climbs to $788, roughly $51 million worth of short positions could be liquidated. This creates an additional incentive for traders to avoid bearish strategies. Large liquidation clusters often discourage short positions and can fuel further upside as forced liquidations amplify price movement. For ZEC, reaching these levels would disrupt bearish sentiment and provide additional support for continued appreciation. Zcash Liquidation Map. Source: Coinglass ZEC Price Has A Lot Of Room To Grow Zcash trades at $671, sitting just below the $700 resistance level. The altcoin has gained 65.5% since the start of the month. This reflects strong market participation and growing interest from both retail and institutional traders. If momentum continues, ZEC could rise toward $1,000, which sits 49% above current levels. Achieving this target within 10 days is possible if investor support remains consistent. To reach $1,000, ZEC must first break through and convert the $700, $800, and $900 levels into support. ZEC Price Analysis. Source: TradingView However, if selling pressure increases, ZEC could lose momentum and fall to $600. A deeper correction may push the price toward $520, invalidating the current bullish thesis, leaving the altcoin vulnerable to a crash.
Share
Coinstats2025/11/21 08:00
ETH's "Zhou Tianzi" Dilemma and SOL's "Entrepreneurship Blog" Rise

ETH's "Zhou Tianzi" Dilemma and SOL's "Entrepreneurship Blog" Rise

First, it should be clarified that both I and my organization hold both ETH and SOL, so holding SOL doesn't give me the right to criticize ETH. ETH's problems are long-standing and won't be ignored by the market simply because of previous hype. Ethereum resembles a feudal, international NGO—bureaucratic, decentralized, and focused on procedural justice. Vitalik Buterin is like the Zhou emperor, prematurely losing centralized power, turning L2 into feudal lords, with very limited proportions of their finances being remitted to the central government. It's even somewhat similar to the Commonwealth of Independent States after the collapse of the Soviet Union, or the Commonwealth of Nations after the fall of the British Empire, though even that connection is barely tenuous. Furthermore, will ETH become like IBM? Microsoft, Amazon, and Nvidia are all worth trillions, while IBM is still sitting there: it's a very branded company, exporting technology and empowering others everywhere, but ultimately its business isn't about taking the entire market (the tax model is the strongest business, like Amazon taxing merchant transactions, and Google taxing global merchants' advertising spending), but rather becoming an organization that licenses tech licenses (and ETH licenses are free, so everyone can use EVM). Another recurring issue is the developer culture where those who are close to the foundation and can flaunt their relationship with it are considered to have "legitimacy" and can enjoy more favor from investors and the community. This centripetal, sycophantic culture runs counter to Ethereum's original mission. Furthermore, I overheard some private conversations among major Wall Street institutions that Wall Street players are coming to ETH for two reasons. Firstly, it's the oldest, most reliable, and reputable public blockchain. Secondly, many of them want to launch permission chains, and ETH's technology in this area has been proven over many years. This approach is essentially using ETH like IBM; it seems that the thinking of Wall Street institutions is remarkably similar to that of Chinese financial institutions. In contrast, Solana exhibits a typical startup team culture—focused, efficient, and with strong execution. Its business model is a unified, integrated system, with a single coin supporting the entire system. Its developer culture resembles Burning Man: young, passionate, and highly experimental, closer to campus hacker culture. From a team and culture perspective, I still feel Solana is more like a multinational tech startup team. Regardless, in the end, everyone is working together to put global assets on the blockchain. Competition is a good thing for all of us.
Share
PANews2025/11/21 09:00