The post The Ending Of ‘The Black Phone 2,’ Explained appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Finney (Mason Thames) and the Grabber (Ethan Hawke) Blumhouse Productions/Universal Pictures Ethan Hawke‘s masked murderer, The Grabber, returns in the sequel to The Black Phone, and this time, he’s been imbued with supernatural powers. The first film saw Finney (Mason Thames) imprisoned in a basement by the Grabber, who is inspired by child abduction paranoias and murder cases from the 70’s. Finney managed to overcome and kill the Grabber, helped by ghostly voices of the murderer’s victims speaking to him from the titular black phone. Four years later, Finney is haunted by the terrible memories of his experience, and his sister Gwen (Madeleine McGraw) is experiencing strange dreams and visions. What Happens In ‘The Black Phone 2’? Finney is trying to smother his anxiety and trauma from his abduction by smoking weed, leading to him ignoring the troubling dreams of Gwen. The siblings both share the gift of premonition and the ability to speak to the dead, but view their power as a curse. Despite triumphing over the masked killer, the household remains broken, with the shadow of their mother’s suicide still hanging heavy in the air. Gwen suffers from recurring nightmares of a Christian camp known as Alpine Lake, and sees terrible visions of mutilated children trapped below a frozen lake. Her mother, Hope (Anna Lore), suffered from the same disturbing dreams many years earlier, and her father (Jeremy Davies) seems to believe that they drove her to madness and suicide. After speaking to her dead mother in a dream, Gwen reckons that there’s a truth to the phenomenon, and convinces Finney and her new boyfriend Ernesto (Miguel Mora) to travel to Alpine Lake Camp, where Hope worked several years ago. As soon as they arrive, a fierce blizzard traps them there with a handful of camp employees. Of… The post The Ending Of ‘The Black Phone 2,’ Explained appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Finney (Mason Thames) and the Grabber (Ethan Hawke) Blumhouse Productions/Universal Pictures Ethan Hawke‘s masked murderer, The Grabber, returns in the sequel to The Black Phone, and this time, he’s been imbued with supernatural powers. The first film saw Finney (Mason Thames) imprisoned in a basement by the Grabber, who is inspired by child abduction paranoias and murder cases from the 70’s. Finney managed to overcome and kill the Grabber, helped by ghostly voices of the murderer’s victims speaking to him from the titular black phone. Four years later, Finney is haunted by the terrible memories of his experience, and his sister Gwen (Madeleine McGraw) is experiencing strange dreams and visions. What Happens In ‘The Black Phone 2’? Finney is trying to smother his anxiety and trauma from his abduction by smoking weed, leading to him ignoring the troubling dreams of Gwen. The siblings both share the gift of premonition and the ability to speak to the dead, but view their power as a curse. Despite triumphing over the masked killer, the household remains broken, with the shadow of their mother’s suicide still hanging heavy in the air. Gwen suffers from recurring nightmares of a Christian camp known as Alpine Lake, and sees terrible visions of mutilated children trapped below a frozen lake. Her mother, Hope (Anna Lore), suffered from the same disturbing dreams many years earlier, and her father (Jeremy Davies) seems to believe that they drove her to madness and suicide. After speaking to her dead mother in a dream, Gwen reckons that there’s a truth to the phenomenon, and convinces Finney and her new boyfriend Ernesto (Miguel Mora) to travel to Alpine Lake Camp, where Hope worked several years ago. As soon as they arrive, a fierce blizzard traps them there with a handful of camp employees. Of…

The Ending Of ‘The Black Phone 2,’ Explained

2025/10/24 03:49

Finney (Mason Thames) and the Grabber (Ethan Hawke)

Blumhouse Productions/Universal Pictures

Ethan Hawke‘s masked murderer, The Grabber, returns in the sequel to The Black Phone, and this time, he’s been imbued with supernatural powers.

The first film saw Finney (Mason Thames) imprisoned in a basement by the Grabber, who is inspired by child abduction paranoias and murder cases from the 70’s.

Finney managed to overcome and kill the Grabber, helped by ghostly voices of the murderer’s victims speaking to him from the titular black phone.

Four years later, Finney is haunted by the terrible memories of his experience, and his sister Gwen (Madeleine McGraw) is experiencing strange dreams and visions.

What Happens In ‘The Black Phone 2’?

Finney is trying to smother his anxiety and trauma from his abduction by smoking weed, leading to him ignoring the troubling dreams of Gwen.

The siblings both share the gift of premonition and the ability to speak to the dead, but view their power as a curse.

Despite triumphing over the masked killer, the household remains broken, with the shadow of their mother’s suicide still hanging heavy in the air.

Gwen suffers from recurring nightmares of a Christian camp known as Alpine Lake, and sees terrible visions of mutilated children trapped below a frozen lake.

Her mother, Hope (Anna Lore), suffered from the same disturbing dreams many years earlier, and her father (Jeremy Davies) seems to believe that they drove her to madness and suicide.

After speaking to her dead mother in a dream, Gwen reckons that there’s a truth to the phenomenon, and convinces Finney and her new boyfriend Ernesto (Miguel Mora) to travel to Alpine Lake Camp, where Hope worked several years ago.

As soon as they arrive, a fierce blizzard traps them there with a handful of camp employees. Of course, an old, disused phone booth stands outside the camp, and almost immediately, Finney hears it ring.

Finney picks up and hears the familiar voice of the Grabber. While the Grabber was just a serial killer in the first film, in The Black Phone 2, he’s a demonic entity, a vengeful spirit, released from Hell to get his revenge.

The Grabber explains that Hell has taken whatever trace of humanity was left in him—all that’s left is his sins.

Gwen continues to be plagued by her disturbing dreams, but the murdered children are trying to help her, offering clues about what happened at the camp decades ago.

The Grabber then appears in her dreams, and like Freddy Krueger, he has the ability to wound her and even commit murder in the dream realm.

Unlike Freddy, he doesn’t seem to have much control over the dream realm, but he does have uncanny, almost cartoonish abilities to hack and slash—at one point, he spins her around like a spinning top, causing her sleeping body to spin in the air.

The phone booth proves the key to waking Gwen up—in The Black Phone universe, phone lines offer a direct line to the spirit and dream realms, which may in fact be the same thing.

After making a scene and clashing with the workers of the camp, Gwen and Finney learn that the Grabber used to work at Alpine Lake camp with their mother, and that he was known as “Wild Bill Hickok.”

The three children he murdered and hid below the ice seem to tether him to reality, with the children’s fearful spirits empowering him to commit more violent acts.

In another dream, Gwen learns that her mother had exactly the same abilities as her, and used them to try and stop the murders, but the Grabber killed her, hanging her body from the ceiling to look like a suicide.

The Ending Of ‘The Black Phone 2,’ Explained

Gwen’s dreams become a battle for survival between her and the Grabber, with Finney, Ernesto and the camp councilors coming to her aid, fighting the invisible Grabber in the real world while she works in the dream realm.

While the Grabber works alone, the living and dead team up together, with Gwen uncovering the bodies of the murdered children below the ice, all of whom burst to the surface and grab the Grabber.

This allows Finney to violently overcome the Grabber, smashing his face against the ice and shattering his iconic mask. Interestingly, this seems to disturb the Grabber more than any of his injuries.

Once the Grabber’s mask is knocked off, it’s clear how his mutilated face has come to resemble the mask, his lips torn away to reveal grinning, skull-like teeth.

Finney seizes the axe and defeats the Grabber with a sharp blow to the head, the killer sinking below the lake, with his murder victims pulling him down below the icy depths.

With the mystery of the murders solved and the bodies recovered, the Grabber’s power over the camp seems to have dissolved.

Finally, the phone booth rings and Gwen picks up, speaking to her mother beyond the grave. Hope gives her daughter the closure she desperately needed, allowing her to embrace her abilities as a gift, rather than a curse.

Despite portraying the Christian camp counselors as close-minded and somewhat ignorant, the film ends with the implication that Christianity is absolutely true, as Heaven and Hell are both framed as real, with the dream realm a flowing veil, touching all realities.

Gwen affirms her love for Ernesto, and Finney has got his confidence back after defeating the ghost of the Grabber. The family drive off in the sunlight, leaving the grisly murders behind them.

Somewhat surprisingly for a horror film, there is no hint of foreboding, or any lingering shot of the Grabber’s eyes flicking open under the water.

There is no post-credits scene, just an earnestly happy ending.

Is There Going To Be A ‘Black Phone 3’?

Possibly, but nothing is confirmed—The Black Phone 2 does not tease a sequel, and leaves the happy ending intact.

In an interview with Variety, Black Phone director Scott Derrickson was asked about a potential third movie. Derrickson seemed hesitant.

“My attitude toward a sequel is that there’s really no justification for making a sequel unless you are genuinely attempting to make a movie that’s better than the first movie,” he said.

“If you’re going to make a third one, it needs to be better than the second one, which is better than the first one. Very few films do that.”

However, the door is certainly open, considering that the Grabber already came back from Hell.

The Grabber could follow the footsteps of countless other horror icons, and repeatedly return from the dead, boasting new powers each time.

MORE FROM FORBES

ForbesThe Twist Ending Of ‘Weapons,’ ExplainedForbesIt’s Official—‘Weapons’ Is Getting A Prequel About Aunt GladysForbesThe Bizarre Ending Of ‘The Conjuring: Last Rites,’ ExplainedForbes‘Terrifier 3’—Who (Or What) Is Art The Clown?

Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/danidiplacido/2025/10/23/the-ending-of-the-black-phone-2-explained/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Understanding the Ethereum Interoperability Layer (EIL): Bridging L2 Fragmentation and Building a Seamless Cross-Chain Experience

Understanding the Ethereum Interoperability Layer (EIL): Bridging L2 Fragmentation and Building a Seamless Cross-Chain Experience

Author: Pan Zhixiong Ethereum has successfully addressed the scaling issue over the past few years by deploying multiple Layer 2 solutions, such as Arbitrum, Optimism, and Base, resulting in reduced transaction costs and increased efficiency. However, this has led to a fragmented user experience: each L2 network acts like an isolated island, with users facing cumbersome steps, different bridging protocols, and complex asset and gas management when crossing chains. To address this pain point, the Ethereum core team recently proposed the Ethereum Interop Layer (EIL). To understand EIL, we first need to review its foundation—ERC-4337. ERC-4337 is an account abstraction standard proposed by Ethereum. It requires no changes to the underlying Ethereum protocol, implementing a new type of account structure—the smart account—simply by deploying smart contracts. This type of account not only supports advanced features such as social recovery, multisignature, and batch operations, but also allows for gas payments using ERC-20 tokens via smart contracts. However, despite the many technological innovations brought by ERC-4337, its adoption in practice remains limited. Fragmented user experience, difficulties in multi-chain collaboration, high gas costs, and ecosystem compatibility issues all restrict the widespread adoption of 4337. The EIL was developed to address these issues on top of ERC-4337. EIL is an additional multi-chain interoperability protocol built upon the ERC-4337 framework . It extends the single-chain account abstraction to multi-chain account interoperability, enabling a seamless experience across multiple L2 networks. Specifically, EIL implements two important innovations: one-signature multi-chain operations (bulk authorization) and a competitive funding mechanism for cross-chain liquidity providers (XLPs). The first innovation, bulk authorization , allows users to authorize multiple operations across multiple L2 networks with a single signature. Specifically, the wallet first constructs its own UserOperation on each relevant chain, then integrates these operations into a Merkle tree. Users only need to sign the root of the tree once. When a smart account on each chain verifies a received UserOperation, it only needs to verify that it belongs to the Merkle tree and that the signature is valid to execute the operation. This approach significantly simplifies the cross-chain operation process for users. The second innovation, the auction-based funding mechanism, introduces a role called Cross-chain Liquidity Provider (XLP). XLPs are responsible for providing asset transfer and gas payment services between different chains. When a user locks assets on the source chain and submits a cross-chain request, multiple XLPs can bid on the request through on-chain auction. The XLP that wins the bid provides a cross-chain asset transfer voucher, allowing the user to directly obtain funds and gas payments on the target chain to complete the required cross-chain operation. Only after the transaction is completed will the XLP claim the user's previously locked assets on the source chain. To ensure security and fairness, XLPs must be staked on the Ethereum mainnet (L1) and subject to a strict dispute arbitration mechanism. If an XLP violates the rules, the staked assets will be forfeited, thus ensuring its integrity through economic incentives . It's worth emphasizing that EIL doesn't require any changes to the consensus protocol of the Ethereum mainnet or L2 network during its implementation . All implementations are based on smart contracts and the existing ERC-4337 account abstraction framework. This design not only reduces the difficulty of implementation but also significantly reduces the security risks the chain itself may face. Of course, this design also shifts the pressure and complexity to the wallet and off-chain infrastructure . The wallet needs to support complex multi-chain transaction construction, one-signature multi-chain verification, interaction mechanisms with CrossChainPaymaster and XLP, and needs to provide a simple and user-friendly interface. The off-chain infrastructure, on the other hand, needs to build a robust auction market, monitor XLP fund flows in real time, and manage risks. Ultimately, EIL provides users with a single-chain-like experience. In the future, when users open EIL-enabled wallets, they will no longer need to frequently switch chains, manage cross-chain assets, or endure lengthy cross-chain waits and cumbersome procedures. All complex cross-chain details will be completed automatically outside the user's view, gradually unifying the user experience across the entire Ethereum L2 ecosystem and truly realizing the vision of multi-chain integration and seamless interoperability. EIL also opens up a whole new possibility for the entire Ethereum ecosystem: it not only solves the cross-chain user experience problem, but more importantly, it truly allows multiple L2 networks to "become one" in a secure, decentralized, and trustless way.
Share
PANews2025/11/21 14:00
Zeus Network Builds The Bridge: Connecting Bitcoin And Solana Ecosystems — Here’s How

Zeus Network Builds The Bridge: Connecting Bitcoin And Solana Ecosystems — Here’s How

Zeus Network is positioning itself at the heart of cross-chain innovation by linking Bitcoin’s unmatched security with Solana’s high-speed infrastructure. If successful, Zeus Network could become a cornerstone of cross-chain adoption, reshaping how value flows between blockchains in the ecosystem. Unlocking New Use Cases For Bitcoin In Solana DeFi Zeus Network is stepping into the spotlight as the project is designed to connect Bitcoin and Solana into one seamless ecosystem, the two most powerful blockchains in the crypto space. SkyeOps, in a post on X, has highlighted the core of Zeus Network’s technology, a decentralized permissionless communication layer that enables interaction between BTC and SOL. This innovative architecture is referred to as Layer 1.5, a hybrid model that leverages BTC security while tapping into SOL performance. Related Reading: Bitcoin Lightning Payment Zaps Across Satellite In Historic First SkyeOps identifies APOLLO as one of Zeus Network’s flagship products, a decentralized Bitcoin-paged token zBTC, an application that enables operations natively on the Solana blockchain. According to the analyst, this is a revolutionary step because it allows Bitcoin holders to participate and earn yield in Solana’s vibrant DeFi ecosystem without having to surrender custody of their BTC to a centralized third party. Furthermore, the network utilizes a novel architecture combining ZeusNode and the Zeus Program Library (ZPL) to facilitate secure cross-chain interactions. The Zeusnode serves as the backbone of the network, with a decentralized system of Guardians who validate and sign cross-chain transactions. Meanwhile, Zeus Program Library (ZPL) provides the essential tools that empower developers to build new applications and services that leverage BTC functionality directly on Solana. Bitcoin Liquidity On Solana Hits An All-Time High The founder of Sensei Holdings and Namaste group, Solana Sensei, has also pointed out a major milestone, celebrating the fact that the supply of BTC on the Solana network has hit a new all-time high, surpassing $1 billion for the first time. Related Reading: Bitcoin Consolidates Gains – Is a Bigger Move Coming Next? According to Solana Sensei, bringing the digital gold onto Solana’s high-performance blockchain enables BTC to gain the speed, low fees, composability, and deep liquidity of the most performant L1 in all cryptocurrencies. As a result, Bitcoin can operate at internet scale, enabling instantaneous trading, use as collateral in lending markets, seamless settlement in DeFi applications, and integration with real-world assets. This connection will create a perfect dynamic. Solana supercharges BTC utility, while BTC lends SOL the ultimate credibility and security as the backbone store of value. “Together, they are turning the vision of Web3 into a true global financial layer. My two favorite cryptos are winning,” Solana Sensei noted. Featured image from Pixabay, chart from Tradingview.com
Share
NewsBTC2025/09/19 05:00