The post When the AI bill comes due, someone needs to pick up the tab appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Every trading day, I play a good-cop, bad-cop routine when it comes to the AI gravy train. The good cop sees boundless upside — the new industrial age unfolding in teraflops, a productivity boom financed by silicon and sweat. The bad cop, meanwhile, glances at LQD sagging under the weight of new supply and wonders how long the credit market can keep swallowing it all. Both have a point. Because this isn’t just another tech cycle — it’s the most capital-intensive build-out in modern market history, and the fuel isn’t earnings anymore, it’s debt. The numbers are staggering. More than $200 billion of AI-linked issuance has already flooded the market this year — more than a quarter of total net U.S. corporate supply. Meta alone dropped $30 billion, drawing a record $125 billion in orders; Oracle’s $18 billion sale in September was snapped up to fund data-center capacity leased to OpenAI. The credit market has become the primary financier of the AI revolution, and investors are lining up for a taste of the future, coupons and all. But beneath the euphoria sits a strange symmetry — the circular nature of the money. Nvidia sells the chips to Oracle. Oracle builds the racks for OpenAI. Microsoft bankrolls OpenAI, allowing it to purchase even more computing power. Meta issues a paper to fund its own hyperscale empire. Dollars spin through the system like current through a circuit board, each node feeding the next. Nothing leaves the ecosystem; it just recirculates between vendors, customers, and financiers, turning Wall Street into a kind of closed-loop liquidity engine. So far, everyone’s happy. Credit spreads remain tight, the big names are pristine, and there’s still more cash chasing paper than paper chasing buyers. Yet the LQD tape tells a quieter story — not one of panic,… The post When the AI bill comes due, someone needs to pick up the tab appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Every trading day, I play a good-cop, bad-cop routine when it comes to the AI gravy train. The good cop sees boundless upside — the new industrial age unfolding in teraflops, a productivity boom financed by silicon and sweat. The bad cop, meanwhile, glances at LQD sagging under the weight of new supply and wonders how long the credit market can keep swallowing it all. Both have a point. Because this isn’t just another tech cycle — it’s the most capital-intensive build-out in modern market history, and the fuel isn’t earnings anymore, it’s debt. The numbers are staggering. More than $200 billion of AI-linked issuance has already flooded the market this year — more than a quarter of total net U.S. corporate supply. Meta alone dropped $30 billion, drawing a record $125 billion in orders; Oracle’s $18 billion sale in September was snapped up to fund data-center capacity leased to OpenAI. The credit market has become the primary financier of the AI revolution, and investors are lining up for a taste of the future, coupons and all. But beneath the euphoria sits a strange symmetry — the circular nature of the money. Nvidia sells the chips to Oracle. Oracle builds the racks for OpenAI. Microsoft bankrolls OpenAI, allowing it to purchase even more computing power. Meta issues a paper to fund its own hyperscale empire. Dollars spin through the system like current through a circuit board, each node feeding the next. Nothing leaves the ecosystem; it just recirculates between vendors, customers, and financiers, turning Wall Street into a kind of closed-loop liquidity engine. So far, everyone’s happy. Credit spreads remain tight, the big names are pristine, and there’s still more cash chasing paper than paper chasing buyers. Yet the LQD tape tells a quieter story — not one of panic,…

When the AI bill comes due, someone needs to pick up the tab

2025/11/04 08:22

Every trading day, I play a good-cop, bad-cop routine when it comes to the AI gravy train. The good cop sees boundless upside — the new industrial age unfolding in teraflops, a productivity boom financed by silicon and sweat. The bad cop, meanwhile, glances at LQD sagging under the weight of new supply and wonders how long the credit market can keep swallowing it all. Both have a point. Because this isn’t just another tech cycle — it’s the most capital-intensive build-out in modern market history, and the fuel isn’t earnings anymore, it’s debt.

The numbers are staggering. More than $200 billion of AI-linked issuance has already flooded the market this year — more than a quarter of total net U.S. corporate supply. Meta alone dropped $30 billion, drawing a record $125 billion in orders; Oracle’s $18 billion sale in September was snapped up to fund data-center capacity leased to OpenAI. The credit market has become the primary financier of the AI revolution, and investors are lining up for a taste of the future, coupons and all.

But beneath the euphoria sits a strange symmetry — the circular nature of the money. Nvidia sells the chips to Oracle. Oracle builds the racks for OpenAI. Microsoft bankrolls OpenAI, allowing it to purchase even more computing power. Meta issues a paper to fund its own hyperscale empire. Dollars spin through the system like current through a circuit board, each node feeding the next. Nothing leaves the ecosystem; it just recirculates between vendors, customers, and financiers, turning Wall Street into a kind of closed-loop liquidity engine.

So far, everyone’s happy. Credit spreads remain tight, the big names are pristine, and there’s still more cash chasing paper than paper chasing buyers. Yet the LQD tape tells a quieter story — not one of panic, but of indigestion. When this much duration hits the market at once, prices soften, ETFs cheapen, and dealers groan under the weight of inventory. It’s not credit risk; it’s plumbing pressure.

The larger question is sustainability. These aren’t light-capex stories. Data centers burn cash the way rocket engines burn fuel — with high thrust, a short burn, and constant refueling. The assets depreciate faster than the returns come in. That’s fine when the cycle’s young and rates are steady, but once refinancing costs rise or growth stalls, the loop tightens. Someone in the chain — a vendor, a customer, a financier — ends up short of breath.

The good cop in me still buys the vision: AI as infrastructure, as the new rail network of the digital world. But the bad cop keeps a hand on the brake, reminding me that the returns on capital still lag the cost of capital. For now, the bond market is content to keep the punch bowl full — but the tab is growing fast.

The music’s still playing, the servers still hum, and the crowd still believes. But under the fluorescent light of those data centers, one truth glows brighter than all: somebody’s gotta pay for the AI party — and this time, it’s the bond market footing the bill.

Desk note:
The street’s still buying the dream, but the tape’s telling you it’s getting full — liquidity’s fine until it isn’t, and right now, LQD’s the first place you’ll see the hangover start.

Source: https://www.fxstreet.com/news/when-the-ai-bill-comes-due-someone-needs-to-pick-up-the-tab-202511032357

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Zcash (ZEC) Rips While Bitcoin Dips — Can This Privacy Coin Run 49% Higher

Zcash (ZEC) Rips While Bitcoin Dips — Can This Privacy Coin Run 49% Higher

Zcash has seen a strong surge in recent weeks as demand for privacy coins grows across the market. ZEC’s rise stands out due to its limited correlation with Bitcoin, allowing it to perform independently during periods of volatility.  This unique behavior has fueled renewed interest and helped strengthen ZEC’s upward momentum. Zcash Is Independent Zcash’s correlation with Bitcoin currently sits at -0.78, signaling a strong negative relationship. This means ZEC is moving in the opposite direction of BTC, which is highly beneficial at a time when Bitcoin is trading near $90,000 after several days of decline. ZEC’s ability to decouple from BTC enables it to avoid broader market pullbacks. This negative correlation has remained intact since early November, reinforcing ZEC’s resilience. As long as the correlation stays below zero, Zcash will be less vulnerable to Bitcoin-driven sell-offs.  Want more token insights like this? Sign up for Editor Harsh Notariya’s Daily Crypto Newsletter here. ZEC Correlation With Bitcoin. Source: TradingView Macro indicators also suggest favorable conditions. Zcash’s liquidation map reveals that short sellers should approach the market with caution. If ZEC climbs to $788, roughly $51 million worth of short positions could be liquidated. This creates an additional incentive for traders to avoid bearish strategies. Large liquidation clusters often discourage short positions and can fuel further upside as forced liquidations amplify price movement. For ZEC, reaching these levels would disrupt bearish sentiment and provide additional support for continued appreciation. Zcash Liquidation Map. Source: Coinglass ZEC Price Has A Lot Of Room To Grow Zcash trades at $671, sitting just below the $700 resistance level. The altcoin has gained 65.5% since the start of the month. This reflects strong market participation and growing interest from both retail and institutional traders. If momentum continues, ZEC could rise toward $1,000, which sits 49% above current levels. Achieving this target within 10 days is possible if investor support remains consistent. To reach $1,000, ZEC must first break through and convert the $700, $800, and $900 levels into support. ZEC Price Analysis. Source: TradingView However, if selling pressure increases, ZEC could lose momentum and fall to $600. A deeper correction may push the price toward $520, invalidating the current bullish thesis, leaving the altcoin vulnerable to a crash.
Share
Coinstats2025/11/21 08:00
ETH's "Zhou Tianzi" Dilemma and SOL's "Entrepreneurship Blog" Rise

ETH's "Zhou Tianzi" Dilemma and SOL's "Entrepreneurship Blog" Rise

First, it should be clarified that both I and my organization hold both ETH and SOL, so holding SOL doesn't give me the right to criticize ETH. ETH's problems are long-standing and won't be ignored by the market simply because of previous hype. Ethereum resembles a feudal, international NGO—bureaucratic, decentralized, and focused on procedural justice. Vitalik Buterin is like the Zhou emperor, prematurely losing centralized power, turning L2 into feudal lords, with very limited proportions of their finances being remitted to the central government. It's even somewhat similar to the Commonwealth of Independent States after the collapse of the Soviet Union, or the Commonwealth of Nations after the fall of the British Empire, though even that connection is barely tenuous. Furthermore, will ETH become like IBM? Microsoft, Amazon, and Nvidia are all worth trillions, while IBM is still sitting there: it's a very branded company, exporting technology and empowering others everywhere, but ultimately its business isn't about taking the entire market (the tax model is the strongest business, like Amazon taxing merchant transactions, and Google taxing global merchants' advertising spending), but rather becoming an organization that licenses tech licenses (and ETH licenses are free, so everyone can use EVM). Another recurring issue is the developer culture where those who are close to the foundation and can flaunt their relationship with it are considered to have "legitimacy" and can enjoy more favor from investors and the community. This centripetal, sycophantic culture runs counter to Ethereum's original mission. Furthermore, I overheard some private conversations among major Wall Street institutions that Wall Street players are coming to ETH for two reasons. Firstly, it's the oldest, most reliable, and reputable public blockchain. Secondly, many of them want to launch permission chains, and ETH's technology in this area has been proven over many years. This approach is essentially using ETH like IBM; it seems that the thinking of Wall Street institutions is remarkably similar to that of Chinese financial institutions. In contrast, Solana exhibits a typical startup team culture—focused, efficient, and with strong execution. Its business model is a unified, integrated system, with a single coin supporting the entire system. Its developer culture resembles Burning Man: young, passionate, and highly experimental, closer to campus hacker culture. From a team and culture perspective, I still feel Solana is more like a multinational tech startup team. Regardless, in the end, everyone is working together to put global assets on the blockchain. Competition is a good thing for all of us.
Share
PANews2025/11/21 09:00