The post New U.S. Law on Crypto Market Structure Nears – CryptoNinjas appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Congress is advancing the Digital Asset Market Structure Clarity Act, a bill that would finally settle the regulatory divide between the SEC and CFTC. By classifying many digital assets as commodities rather than securities, it is intended to provide clearer rules and a more defined regulatory framework for digital asset projects, especially in DeFi—though critics warn it could weaken investor protection and anti-money-laundering oversight. Online Platforms and the Shifting Digital Economy Across the digital economy, regulation is redefining how platforms function—from crypto markets and digital payment systems to streaming services, esports, and online gaming environments. As blockchain integration and token-based transactions become more common, the boundaries between finance, entertainment, and technology continue to merge. This shift has brought new attention to transparency, licensing, and data integrity as important elements of user trust and market stability. In this wider context, observers often highlight examples such as decentralized exchanges, esports hubs, and stake casino alternatives to show how emerging sectors are adapting to higher compliance standards. In the case of alternatives to stake casinos, these platforms typically emphasize verifiable fairness, a broader range of available games, incentive structures, diversified payment options, and fast access to services—all framed within clearer oversight and licensing conditions. Their development reflects a broader move toward digital environments that combine usability with transparency and responsible governance. As lawmakers refine frameworks for digital assets through initiatives like the CLARITY Act, similar principles are shaping adjacent sectors—emphasizing clarity, oversight, and long-term sustainability in the evolving online economy. Defining Who Regulates What For years, crypto firms have operated under uncertainty. The SEC has treated many tokens as securities, while the CFTC has viewed others as commodities. The CLARITY Act establishes three legal categories: digital commodities, investment-contract assets, and permitted payment stablecoins. The CFTC would oversee digital commodities and spot markets; the… The post New U.S. Law on Crypto Market Structure Nears – CryptoNinjas appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Congress is advancing the Digital Asset Market Structure Clarity Act, a bill that would finally settle the regulatory divide between the SEC and CFTC. By classifying many digital assets as commodities rather than securities, it is intended to provide clearer rules and a more defined regulatory framework for digital asset projects, especially in DeFi—though critics warn it could weaken investor protection and anti-money-laundering oversight. Online Platforms and the Shifting Digital Economy Across the digital economy, regulation is redefining how platforms function—from crypto markets and digital payment systems to streaming services, esports, and online gaming environments. As blockchain integration and token-based transactions become more common, the boundaries between finance, entertainment, and technology continue to merge. This shift has brought new attention to transparency, licensing, and data integrity as important elements of user trust and market stability. In this wider context, observers often highlight examples such as decentralized exchanges, esports hubs, and stake casino alternatives to show how emerging sectors are adapting to higher compliance standards. In the case of alternatives to stake casinos, these platforms typically emphasize verifiable fairness, a broader range of available games, incentive structures, diversified payment options, and fast access to services—all framed within clearer oversight and licensing conditions. Their development reflects a broader move toward digital environments that combine usability with transparency and responsible governance. As lawmakers refine frameworks for digital assets through initiatives like the CLARITY Act, similar principles are shaping adjacent sectors—emphasizing clarity, oversight, and long-term sustainability in the evolving online economy. Defining Who Regulates What For years, crypto firms have operated under uncertainty. The SEC has treated many tokens as securities, while the CFTC has viewed others as commodities. The CLARITY Act establishes three legal categories: digital commodities, investment-contract assets, and permitted payment stablecoins. The CFTC would oversee digital commodities and spot markets; the…

New U.S. Law on Crypto Market Structure Nears – CryptoNinjas

2025/11/20 03:18

Congress is advancing the Digital Asset Market Structure Clarity Act, a bill that would finally settle the regulatory divide between the SEC and CFTC. By classifying many digital assets as commodities rather than securities, it is intended to provide clearer rules and a more defined regulatory framework for digital asset projects, especially in DeFi—though critics warn it could weaken investor protection and anti-money-laundering oversight.

Online Platforms and the Shifting Digital Economy

Across the digital economy, regulation is redefining how platforms function—from crypto markets and digital payment systems to streaming services, esports, and online gaming environments. As blockchain integration and token-based transactions become more common, the boundaries between finance, entertainment, and technology continue to merge. This shift has brought new attention to transparency, licensing, and data integrity as important elements of user trust and market stability.

In this wider context, observers often highlight examples such as decentralized exchanges, esports hubs, and stake casino alternatives to show how emerging sectors are adapting to higher compliance standards. In the case of alternatives to stake casinos, these platforms typically emphasize verifiable fairness, a broader range of available games, incentive structures, diversified payment options, and fast access to services—all framed within clearer oversight and licensing conditions. Their development reflects a broader move toward digital environments that combine usability with transparency and responsible governance.

As lawmakers refine frameworks for digital assets through initiatives like the CLARITY Act, similar principles are shaping adjacent sectors—emphasizing clarity, oversight, and long-term sustainability in the evolving online economy.

Defining Who Regulates What

For years, crypto firms have operated under uncertainty. The SEC has treated many tokens as securities, while the CFTC has viewed others as commodities. The CLARITY Act establishes three legal categories: digital commodities, investment-contract assets, and permitted payment stablecoins. The CFTC would oversee digital commodities and spot markets; the SEC would retain authority over assets sold as investment contracts. By drawing clear lines, lawmakers hope to end the turf war that has slowed both innovation and enforcement.

The bill also creates registration rules for exchanges and brokers handling digital commodities, with requirements for transparency, custody, and customer protection. It clarifies how tokens can evolve from securities to commodities as networks mature, offering projects a lawful path from launch to open trading and replacing regulatory uncertainty with clearer ground rules for innovation.

Implications for DeFi and Market Access

Supporters say the law would open the market to broader participation and attract institutional investors previously deterred by unclear rules. Clearer definitions could reduce compliance risks for exchanges, custodians, and DeFi developers. The bill also exempts certain non-custodial protocols—developers and node operators who don’t hold client assets—from full registration, acknowledging the decentralized nature of blockchain systems.

Industry observers say the approach could boost U.S. competitiveness by encouraging innovation to stay onshore rather than move to jurisdictions with friendlier rules. With standardized oversight and fewer gray areas, venture funding and institutional partnerships may increase, while developers gain confidence to build compliant products without fear of sudden enforcement shifts.

Concerns About Oversight

Opponents argue that shifting major oversight to the CFTC could weaken consumer protection, since the SEC has traditionally taken the lead on disclosure and fraud prevention. Some fear firms will label tokens as commodities to avoid stricter rules. Others point to gaps in the bill’s anti–money-laundering provisions, saying decentralized platforms still pose risks for illicit finance. Without strong enforcement tools, critics warn, the new framework could create regulatory blind spots instead of clarity.

Skeptics also question whether the CFTC has the resources to handle an expanded mandate, noting that its budget and staffing are far smaller than the SEC’s. They argue that effective oversight of fast-moving digital markets will require new funding, technology, and expertise—otherwise, the promise of clarity could be undermined by limited enforcement capacity and inconsistent supervision across agencies.

Legislative Progress and Next Steps

Introduced in May 2025 by Representative French Hill, the CLARITY Act passed the House in July with bipartisan backing. It now moves to the Senate, where negotiations may adjust DeFi exemptions, reporting standards, and agency coordination. If enacted, both the SEC and CFTC would begin drafting detailed rules for registration, disclosures, and compliance timelines.

The CLARITY Act could mark a new era for U.S. crypto regulation—one promising structure and predictability after years of friction. Whether it strengthens trust and investor safety or simply shifts oversight burdens remains to be seen. For now, the world’s largest crypto market stands on the edge of a long-awaited reset.

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER

The latest news, articles, and resources, sent to your inbox weekly. [convertkit form=7791140]

Source: https://www.cryptoninjas.net/news/new-us-law-on-crypto-market-structure-nears/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Zcash (ZEC) Rips While Bitcoin Dips — Can This Privacy Coin Run 49% Higher

Zcash (ZEC) Rips While Bitcoin Dips — Can This Privacy Coin Run 49% Higher

Zcash has seen a strong surge in recent weeks as demand for privacy coins grows across the market. ZEC’s rise stands out due to its limited correlation with Bitcoin, allowing it to perform independently during periods of volatility.  This unique behavior has fueled renewed interest and helped strengthen ZEC’s upward momentum. Zcash Is Independent Zcash’s correlation with Bitcoin currently sits at -0.78, signaling a strong negative relationship. This means ZEC is moving in the opposite direction of BTC, which is highly beneficial at a time when Bitcoin is trading near $90,000 after several days of decline. ZEC’s ability to decouple from BTC enables it to avoid broader market pullbacks. This negative correlation has remained intact since early November, reinforcing ZEC’s resilience. As long as the correlation stays below zero, Zcash will be less vulnerable to Bitcoin-driven sell-offs.  Want more token insights like this? Sign up for Editor Harsh Notariya’s Daily Crypto Newsletter here. ZEC Correlation With Bitcoin. Source: TradingView Macro indicators also suggest favorable conditions. Zcash’s liquidation map reveals that short sellers should approach the market with caution. If ZEC climbs to $788, roughly $51 million worth of short positions could be liquidated. This creates an additional incentive for traders to avoid bearish strategies. Large liquidation clusters often discourage short positions and can fuel further upside as forced liquidations amplify price movement. For ZEC, reaching these levels would disrupt bearish sentiment and provide additional support for continued appreciation. Zcash Liquidation Map. Source: Coinglass ZEC Price Has A Lot Of Room To Grow Zcash trades at $671, sitting just below the $700 resistance level. The altcoin has gained 65.5% since the start of the month. This reflects strong market participation and growing interest from both retail and institutional traders. If momentum continues, ZEC could rise toward $1,000, which sits 49% above current levels. Achieving this target within 10 days is possible if investor support remains consistent. To reach $1,000, ZEC must first break through and convert the $700, $800, and $900 levels into support. ZEC Price Analysis. Source: TradingView However, if selling pressure increases, ZEC could lose momentum and fall to $600. A deeper correction may push the price toward $520, invalidating the current bullish thesis, leaving the altcoin vulnerable to a crash.
Share
Coinstats2025/11/21 08:00
ETH's "Zhou Tianzi" Dilemma and SOL's "Entrepreneurship Blog" Rise

ETH's "Zhou Tianzi" Dilemma and SOL's "Entrepreneurship Blog" Rise

First, it should be clarified that both I and my organization hold both ETH and SOL, so holding SOL doesn't give me the right to criticize ETH. ETH's problems are long-standing and won't be ignored by the market simply because of previous hype. Ethereum resembles a feudal, international NGO—bureaucratic, decentralized, and focused on procedural justice. Vitalik Buterin is like the Zhou emperor, prematurely losing centralized power, turning L2 into feudal lords, with very limited proportions of their finances being remitted to the central government. It's even somewhat similar to the Commonwealth of Independent States after the collapse of the Soviet Union, or the Commonwealth of Nations after the fall of the British Empire, though even that connection is barely tenuous. Furthermore, will ETH become like IBM? Microsoft, Amazon, and Nvidia are all worth trillions, while IBM is still sitting there: it's a very branded company, exporting technology and empowering others everywhere, but ultimately its business isn't about taking the entire market (the tax model is the strongest business, like Amazon taxing merchant transactions, and Google taxing global merchants' advertising spending), but rather becoming an organization that licenses tech licenses (and ETH licenses are free, so everyone can use EVM). Another recurring issue is the developer culture where those who are close to the foundation and can flaunt their relationship with it are considered to have "legitimacy" and can enjoy more favor from investors and the community. This centripetal, sycophantic culture runs counter to Ethereum's original mission. Furthermore, I overheard some private conversations among major Wall Street institutions that Wall Street players are coming to ETH for two reasons. Firstly, it's the oldest, most reliable, and reputable public blockchain. Secondly, many of them want to launch permission chains, and ETH's technology in this area has been proven over many years. This approach is essentially using ETH like IBM; it seems that the thinking of Wall Street institutions is remarkably similar to that of Chinese financial institutions. In contrast, Solana exhibits a typical startup team culture—focused, efficient, and with strong execution. Its business model is a unified, integrated system, with a single coin supporting the entire system. Its developer culture resembles Burning Man: young, passionate, and highly experimental, closer to campus hacker culture. From a team and culture perspective, I still feel Solana is more like a multinational tech startup team. Regardless, in the end, everyone is working together to put global assets on the blockchain. Competition is a good thing for all of us.
Share
PANews2025/11/21 09:00