Figment and OpenTrade launched a stablecoin yield product targeting 15% APR through Solana staking combined with perpetual futures hedging. Institutional clients deposit stablecoins, which are converted to SOL, staked via Figment, and hedged through short positions on Crypto.com. The structure aims to provide higher yields than Treasury-backed alternatives while avoiding DeFi protocol risks. Returns depend on funding rates and Solana network performance, with multiple counterparty dependencies including Figment, OpenTrade, and Crypto.com. The product represents infrastructure providers expanding into structured financial products and may validate similar offerings across other proof-of-stake networks.Figment and OpenTrade launched a stablecoin yield product targeting 15% APR through Solana staking combined with perpetual futures hedging. Institutional clients deposit stablecoins, which are converted to SOL, staked via Figment, and hedged through short positions on Crypto.com. The structure aims to provide higher yields than Treasury-backed alternatives while avoiding DeFi protocol risks. Returns depend on funding rates and Solana network performance, with multiple counterparty dependencies including Figment, OpenTrade, and Crypto.com. The product represents infrastructure providers expanding into structured financial products and may validate similar offerings across other proof-of-stake networks.

How Figment and OpenTrade Created a 15% Stablecoin Yield Product Without DeFi Risk

2025/11/20 02:05

\ Figment, the world's largest independent staking provider with over $18 billion in assets under stake, believes it has cracked the code.

\ On November 17, 2025, Figment announced a partnership with OpenTrade and Crypto.com to launch what they're calling a "new category" of stablecoin yield. The product promises approximately 15% annual percentage rate on stablecoins through a combination of Solana staking rewards and derivative hedging, a structure that sidesteps the credit risk inherent in traditional DeFi lending markets.

\ The announcement arrives as institutional appetite for stablecoin yield products continues to accelerate, with total stablecoin market capitalization exceeding $180 billion globally. But most existing yield products expose investors to either DeFi protocol vulnerabilities or counterparty credit risk from centralized lenders. This product attempts to chart a different path.

\

The Mechanics Behind Price-Neutral Staking

The product's structure relies on a relatively straightforward arbitrage between staking yields and futures markets. When institutional clients deposit stablecoins (USDC, USDT, or other approved tokens) through Figment's platform, OpenTrade converts these deposits into Solana (SOL) tokens. These SOL tokens are then staked through a dedicated Figment-operated validator node.

\ Here's where the innovation comes in. Staking SOL typically generates returns between 6.5% and 7.5% annually, according to historical Solana network data. To reach the advertised 15% APR target, OpenTrade simultaneously opens short positions in SOL perpetual futures contracts. These derivatives positions are designed to neutralize the price exposure of the underlying staked tokens.

\ The mechanism works because perpetual futures contracts on Solana typically trade at a premium to spot prices in bull markets, meaning short sellers collect funding rate payments from long position holders. When combined with staking rewards, this dual income stream has historically generated returns that more than double the base staking rate, according to the press materials.

\ Crypto.com serves as both the custodian for the staked SOL assets and the exchange venue where the hedging transactions execute. The assets are held in segregated accounts with security interests granted to investors, a legal structure that OpenTrade emphasizes provides protections not typically available in DeFi protocols.

\

Why Institutions Are Paying Attention

The product targets a specific pain point for institutional treasury managers. Companies holding large stablecoin balances face opportunity costs, since idle stablecoins generate zero return. Traditional banking yields on dollar deposits remain low, while DeFi lending protocols expose institutions to smart contract vulnerabilities and opaque counterparty risks.

\ Andy Cronk, Co-founder and Chief Product Officer of Figment, framed the offering as bringing "battle-tested infrastructure and security mindset to stablecoins." Figment operates validators across more than 80 blockchain networks and maintains institutional-grade security protocols including slashing protection and audited infrastructure.

\ The institutional focus is deliberate. Unlike retail DeFi products that often lack clear legal frameworks, this product establishes identified counterparties available around the clock. Jeff Handler, Co-Founder and Chief Commercial Officer of OpenTrade, emphasized that the platform was "purpose built" to allow companies to power stablecoin yield products with "enterprise-grade technology systems" and "time-tested legal protections."

\ OpenTrade has backing from notable crypto venture firms including Andreessen Horowitz's a16z Crypto fund and Circle, the issuer of USDC stablecoin. This institutional pedigree matters in a market where regulatory scrutiny of crypto yield products has intensified following high-profile failures like Celsius Network and BlockFi.

\

The Risk Profile and Market Context

The 15% APR figure deserves scrutiny. The product materials include a disclaimer noting that the rate is "based on historical data" and "subject to change at any time." Figment explicitly states it does not "set, control, or guarantee yield rates or returns."

\ Several variables affect the actual returns. Solana staking rewards fluctuate based on network inflation rates and total staked supply. Perpetual futures funding rates can turn negative during bearish market conditions, meaning short position holders would pay rather than receive funding payments. During periods of extreme volatility or low liquidity, the cost of maintaining hedges could erode returns significantly.

\ The reliance on Solana as the underlying staking asset also concentrates risk. While Solana has established itself as one of the largest proof-of-stake networks with hundreds of billions in cumulative transaction volume, the network has experienced outages historically. Because clients delegate rather than transfer control of tokens, staking providers like Figment do not exercise discretionary authority—but network downtime can still affect staking rewards and the operational timing of the hedging strategy.

\ Counterparty risk, while reduced compared to unsecured DeFi lending, still exists. The product depends on Crypto.com maintaining operational stability as both custodian and execution venue. If the exchange faces liquidity constraints or regulatory actions, investor access to assets could be impaired. The segregated account structure provides some legal protection, but unwinding these positions during a crisis scenario would likely take time.

\ Karl Turner, Director at Crypto.com, noted the exchange has "purpose built" its platform to serve trader needs, but institutional clients will need to conduct their own due diligence on the exchange's operational resilience and regulatory compliance.

Competitive Landscape and Market Implications

The stablecoin yield market has evolved rapidly. Protocols like Ethena offer synthetic dollar products backed by delta-neutral perpetual futures strategies, generating yields that have ranged from 8% to over 30% depending on market conditions. Real-world asset (RWA) protocols like Ondo Finance and Mountain Protocol provide yields backed by U.S. Treasury bills, typically in the 4% to 5% range.

\ This Figment-OpenTrade product sits between those alternatives. It offers higher yields than RWA products but with additional smart contract and market risk. It provides more institutional infrastructure than pure DeFi alternatives but with potentially lower yields during unfavorable funding rate environments.

\ The partnership's significance extends beyond a single product launch. Figment's expansion into stablecoin yield represents the maturation of crypto infrastructure providers moving beyond pure validator operations into more complex financial products. OpenTrade's ability to secure partnerships with both Figment and Crypto.com demonstrates growing institutional acceptance of structured crypto yield strategies.

\ For the broader market, success of this product could validate the staking-plus-hedging model and prompt competitors to launch similar offerings. The entrance of established players with institutional relationships may also pressure DeFi protocols to improve their own risk management and transparency standards.

\

Final Thoughts

The Figment-OpenTrade partnership bets that institutions prioritize clearly defined counterparties and legal structures over maximum yields. This reads the institutional market correctly, where risk committees value operational resilience over percentage points.

\ The 15% APR target appears realistic during favorable conditions but optimistic long-term. Perpetual futures funding rates are cyclical, and bear markets would compress returns. The model's scalability across other proof-of-stake networks like Ethereum or Avalanche is intriguing, though funding rate dynamics will compress as more capital adopts similar strategies.

\ Most significant is what this signals: crypto infrastructure providers are evolving from pure validator operations into orchestrators of complex financial strategies. This vertical integration between staking, custody, and structured products may become the institutional crypto template. Whether this complexity accelerates or hinders adoption remains the open question.

\ Don’t forget to like and share the story!

:::tip This author is an independent contributor publishing via our business blogging program. HackerNoon has reviewed the report for quality, but the claims herein belong to the author. #DYO

:::

\

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Zcash (ZEC) Rips While Bitcoin Dips — Can This Privacy Coin Run 49% Higher

Zcash (ZEC) Rips While Bitcoin Dips — Can This Privacy Coin Run 49% Higher

Zcash has seen a strong surge in recent weeks as demand for privacy coins grows across the market. ZEC’s rise stands out due to its limited correlation with Bitcoin, allowing it to perform independently during periods of volatility.  This unique behavior has fueled renewed interest and helped strengthen ZEC’s upward momentum. Zcash Is Independent Zcash’s correlation with Bitcoin currently sits at -0.78, signaling a strong negative relationship. This means ZEC is moving in the opposite direction of BTC, which is highly beneficial at a time when Bitcoin is trading near $90,000 after several days of decline. ZEC’s ability to decouple from BTC enables it to avoid broader market pullbacks. This negative correlation has remained intact since early November, reinforcing ZEC’s resilience. As long as the correlation stays below zero, Zcash will be less vulnerable to Bitcoin-driven sell-offs.  Want more token insights like this? Sign up for Editor Harsh Notariya’s Daily Crypto Newsletter here. ZEC Correlation With Bitcoin. Source: TradingView Macro indicators also suggest favorable conditions. Zcash’s liquidation map reveals that short sellers should approach the market with caution. If ZEC climbs to $788, roughly $51 million worth of short positions could be liquidated. This creates an additional incentive for traders to avoid bearish strategies. Large liquidation clusters often discourage short positions and can fuel further upside as forced liquidations amplify price movement. For ZEC, reaching these levels would disrupt bearish sentiment and provide additional support for continued appreciation. Zcash Liquidation Map. Source: Coinglass ZEC Price Has A Lot Of Room To Grow Zcash trades at $671, sitting just below the $700 resistance level. The altcoin has gained 65.5% since the start of the month. This reflects strong market participation and growing interest from both retail and institutional traders. If momentum continues, ZEC could rise toward $1,000, which sits 49% above current levels. Achieving this target within 10 days is possible if investor support remains consistent. To reach $1,000, ZEC must first break through and convert the $700, $800, and $900 levels into support. ZEC Price Analysis. Source: TradingView However, if selling pressure increases, ZEC could lose momentum and fall to $600. A deeper correction may push the price toward $520, invalidating the current bullish thesis, leaving the altcoin vulnerable to a crash.
Share
Coinstats2025/11/21 08:00
The $40 Million ‘Free Money’ Glitch in Crypto Prediction Markets

The $40 Million ‘Free Money’ Glitch in Crypto Prediction Markets

The post The $40 Million ‘Free Money’ Glitch in Crypto Prediction Markets appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In brief Researchers found $40 million in “risk-free” profits from mispriced markets on Polymarket in one year. Prices on some markets didn’t add up to 100%, letting traders lock in guaranteed gains. The same inefficiencies likely exist on other platforms like Myriad and Kalshi, though arbitrageurs help correct them. A new academic paper suggests there’s been a steady stream of “free money” lying around on Polymarket—and smart traders have been scooping it up. The paper, Unravelling the Probabilistic Forest: Arbitrage in Prediction Markets, is the most detailed look yet at how mispricing creeps into crypto’s most popular prediction platform. The researchers combed through a year of data, from April 2024 to April 2025, and found thousands of instances where market prices simply didn’t add up. In some cases, the prices of “Yes” and “No” shares in a single market didn’t sum to one dollar as they theoretically should, creating a risk-free profit for anyone quick enough to pounce.  In other cases, the mispricing was more subtle, involving logically related markets. For example, a market on “Trump wins the presidency” might trade at very different odds than “Republican wins the presidency,” even though those outcomes are tightly linked. By buying and selling combinations of these contracts, a savvy trader could lock in a profit no matter what happens. The researchers estimate more than $40 million in profits have already been pulled from the system by arbitrageurs, traders who specialize in sniffing out and exploiting these kinds of inconsistencies. Far from being a theoretical curiosity, this is a live and lucrative business model. Is this pattern true across all prediction markets? What’s striking is how common these opportunities are. The study found more than 7,000 markets with measurable mispricing, many in highly liquid, closely watched contracts. “Prediction markets are often treated…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 14:34
ETH's "Zhou Tianzi" Dilemma and SOL's "Entrepreneurship Blog" Rise

ETH's "Zhou Tianzi" Dilemma and SOL's "Entrepreneurship Blog" Rise

First, it should be clarified that both I and my organization hold both ETH and SOL, so holding SOL doesn't give me the right to criticize ETH. ETH's problems are long-standing and won't be ignored by the market simply because of previous hype. Ethereum resembles a feudal, international NGO—bureaucratic, decentralized, and focused on procedural justice. Vitalik Buterin is like the Zhou emperor, prematurely losing centralized power, turning L2 into feudal lords, with very limited proportions of their finances being remitted to the central government. It's even somewhat similar to the Commonwealth of Independent States after the collapse of the Soviet Union, or the Commonwealth of Nations after the fall of the British Empire, though even that connection is barely tenuous. Furthermore, will ETH become like IBM? Microsoft, Amazon, and Nvidia are all worth trillions, while IBM is still sitting there: it's a very branded company, exporting technology and empowering others everywhere, but ultimately its business isn't about taking the entire market (the tax model is the strongest business, like Amazon taxing merchant transactions, and Google taxing global merchants' advertising spending), but rather becoming an organization that licenses tech licenses (and ETH licenses are free, so everyone can use EVM). Another recurring issue is the developer culture where those who are close to the foundation and can flaunt their relationship with it are considered to have "legitimacy" and can enjoy more favor from investors and the community. This centripetal, sycophantic culture runs counter to Ethereum's original mission. Furthermore, I overheard some private conversations among major Wall Street institutions that Wall Street players are coming to ETH for two reasons. Firstly, it's the oldest, most reliable, and reputable public blockchain. Secondly, many of them want to launch permission chains, and ETH's technology in this area has been proven over many years. This approach is essentially using ETH like IBM; it seems that the thinking of Wall Street institutions is remarkably similar to that of Chinese financial institutions. In contrast, Solana exhibits a typical startup team culture—focused, efficient, and with strong execution. Its business model is a unified, integrated system, with a single coin supporting the entire system. Its developer culture resembles Burning Man: young, passionate, and highly experimental, closer to campus hacker culture. From a team and culture perspective, I still feel Solana is more like a multinational tech startup team. Regardless, in the end, everyone is working together to put global assets on the blockchain. Competition is a good thing for all of us.
Share
PANews2025/11/21 09:00