The post Samourai Wallet Co-Founder Given Four-Year Federal Prison Term appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Crime A case that began with a debate about digital privacy has ended with prison time. William Hill, one of the minds behind Samourai Wallet, has been sentenced to four years in federal prison — a ruling that instantly becomes a landmark moment in how the United States treats privacy technology inside the crypto world. Key Takeaways: Samourai Wallet co-founder William Hill received four years in federal prison. Prosecutors argued the wallet’s privacy features were engineered to facilitate criminal fund movement. The platform was linked to more than $237 million in illegal transactions, according to the DOJ.  Instead of framing Hill as a rogue developer, the government positioned him as an operator of an underground financial service. In their view, Samourai didn’t merely offer privacy — it enabled an entire black-market liquidity channel. How the Case Reached This Point Hill and co-founder Keonne Rodriguez both chose to take plea deals earlier this year, admitting to operating an unlicensed money-transmission business. That agreement allowed prosecutors to drop heavier allegations, including conspiracy to launder money, but it didn’t spare them from serious punishment. Rodriguez received a five-year maximum sentence several months ago. Hill’s four-year term came later and was reduced only after the court weighed his age and a recent autism diagnosis. Even with that consideration, the judge emphasized that the scale of criminal financial flow through Samourai demanded accountability. According to the Department of Justice, more than $237 million in illegal transfers moved through the platform — funds connected to darknet markets, hacked funds and other criminal activities. Prosecutors Pushed a Central Theme: Privacy by Design, Crime by Intent At the heart of the case was the government’s interpretation of Samourai’s privacy tools. Investigators argued that Whirlpool and Ricochet weren’t simply options for law-abiding users who wanted confidentiality — they were… The post Samourai Wallet Co-Founder Given Four-Year Federal Prison Term appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Crime A case that began with a debate about digital privacy has ended with prison time. William Hill, one of the minds behind Samourai Wallet, has been sentenced to four years in federal prison — a ruling that instantly becomes a landmark moment in how the United States treats privacy technology inside the crypto world. Key Takeaways: Samourai Wallet co-founder William Hill received four years in federal prison. Prosecutors argued the wallet’s privacy features were engineered to facilitate criminal fund movement. The platform was linked to more than $237 million in illegal transactions, according to the DOJ.  Instead of framing Hill as a rogue developer, the government positioned him as an operator of an underground financial service. In their view, Samourai didn’t merely offer privacy — it enabled an entire black-market liquidity channel. How the Case Reached This Point Hill and co-founder Keonne Rodriguez both chose to take plea deals earlier this year, admitting to operating an unlicensed money-transmission business. That agreement allowed prosecutors to drop heavier allegations, including conspiracy to launder money, but it didn’t spare them from serious punishment. Rodriguez received a five-year maximum sentence several months ago. Hill’s four-year term came later and was reduced only after the court weighed his age and a recent autism diagnosis. Even with that consideration, the judge emphasized that the scale of criminal financial flow through Samourai demanded accountability. According to the Department of Justice, more than $237 million in illegal transfers moved through the platform — funds connected to darknet markets, hacked funds and other criminal activities. Prosecutors Pushed a Central Theme: Privacy by Design, Crime by Intent At the heart of the case was the government’s interpretation of Samourai’s privacy tools. Investigators argued that Whirlpool and Ricochet weren’t simply options for law-abiding users who wanted confidentiality — they were…

Samourai Wallet Co-Founder Given Four-Year Federal Prison Term

2025/11/20 17:08
Crime

A case that began with a debate about digital privacy has ended with prison time. William Hill, one of the minds behind Samourai Wallet, has been sentenced to four years in federal prison — a ruling that instantly becomes a landmark moment in how the United States treats privacy technology inside the crypto world.

Key Takeaways:
  • Samourai Wallet co-founder William Hill received four years in federal prison.
  • Prosecutors argued the wallet’s privacy features were engineered to facilitate criminal fund movement.
  • The platform was linked to more than $237 million in illegal transactions, according to the DOJ. 

Instead of framing Hill as a rogue developer, the government positioned him as an operator of an underground financial service. In their view, Samourai didn’t merely offer privacy — it enabled an entire black-market liquidity channel.

How the Case Reached This Point

Hill and co-founder Keonne Rodriguez both chose to take plea deals earlier this year, admitting to operating an unlicensed money-transmission business. That agreement allowed prosecutors to drop heavier allegations, including conspiracy to launder money, but it didn’t spare them from serious punishment.

Rodriguez received a five-year maximum sentence several months ago. Hill’s four-year term came later and was reduced only after the court weighed his age and a recent autism diagnosis. Even with that consideration, the judge emphasized that the scale of criminal financial flow through Samourai demanded accountability.

According to the Department of Justice, more than $237 million in illegal transfers moved through the platform — funds connected to darknet markets, hacked funds and other criminal activities.

Prosecutors Pushed a Central Theme: Privacy by Design, Crime by Intent

At the heart of the case was the government’s interpretation of Samourai’s privacy tools. Investigators argued that Whirlpool and Ricochet weren’t simply options for law-abiding users who wanted confidentiality — they were deliberately engineered to attract people trying to conceal illicit transactions.

Court filings pointed to advertising language, community engagement and feature development cycles as evidence that the project was built to serve individuals who wanted to stay hidden rather than simply stay private.

The prosecution repeatedly described Samourai as a pipeline in which every step — from mixing, to obfuscation, to forwarding — was optimized to defeat investigative tracking.

Why This Ruling Matters Far Beyond Samourai

Hill’s conviction doesn’t end with one wallet, one platform or one developer team. It reinforces a rapidly forming legal precedent: builders of privacy systems may be held criminally responsible for how users interact with their tools — even if those developers never handle customer funds.

The timing is also significant. The decision follows the conviction of Tornado Cash developer Roman Storm and arrives amid a wave of open investigations into mixers, anonymizing protocols and non-custodial wallets. The question now echoing through the industry is whether privacy tech is still considered a form of protected innovation, or whether it is increasingly being treated as financial infrastructure subject to full regulatory enforcement.

Crypto privacy advocates say the ruling will chill experimentation. Regulators insist the ruling protects markets. Whichever interpretation prevails, one thing is certain: the U.S. is no longer treating privacy in crypto as a neutral engineering challenge — it is treating it as a matter of criminal liability.


The information provided in this article is for educational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, or trading advice. Coindoo.com does not endorse or recommend any specific investment strategy or cryptocurrency. Always conduct your own research and consult with a licensed financial advisor before making any investment decisions.

Author

Alex is an experienced financial journalist and cryptocurrency enthusiast. With over 8 years of experience covering the crypto, blockchain, and fintech industries, he is well-versed in the complex and ever-evolving world of digital assets. His insightful and thought-provoking articles provide readers with a clear picture of the latest developments and trends in the market. His approach allows him to break down complex ideas into accessible and in-depth content. Follow his publications to stay up to date with the most important trends and topics.

Related stories

Next article

Source: https://coindoo.com/samourai-wallet-co-founder-given-four-year-federal-prison-term/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Zcash (ZEC) Rips While Bitcoin Dips — Can This Privacy Coin Run 49% Higher

Zcash (ZEC) Rips While Bitcoin Dips — Can This Privacy Coin Run 49% Higher

Zcash has seen a strong surge in recent weeks as demand for privacy coins grows across the market. ZEC’s rise stands out due to its limited correlation with Bitcoin, allowing it to perform independently during periods of volatility.  This unique behavior has fueled renewed interest and helped strengthen ZEC’s upward momentum. Zcash Is Independent Zcash’s correlation with Bitcoin currently sits at -0.78, signaling a strong negative relationship. This means ZEC is moving in the opposite direction of BTC, which is highly beneficial at a time when Bitcoin is trading near $90,000 after several days of decline. ZEC’s ability to decouple from BTC enables it to avoid broader market pullbacks. This negative correlation has remained intact since early November, reinforcing ZEC’s resilience. As long as the correlation stays below zero, Zcash will be less vulnerable to Bitcoin-driven sell-offs.  Want more token insights like this? Sign up for Editor Harsh Notariya’s Daily Crypto Newsletter here. ZEC Correlation With Bitcoin. Source: TradingView Macro indicators also suggest favorable conditions. Zcash’s liquidation map reveals that short sellers should approach the market with caution. If ZEC climbs to $788, roughly $51 million worth of short positions could be liquidated. This creates an additional incentive for traders to avoid bearish strategies. Large liquidation clusters often discourage short positions and can fuel further upside as forced liquidations amplify price movement. For ZEC, reaching these levels would disrupt bearish sentiment and provide additional support for continued appreciation. Zcash Liquidation Map. Source: Coinglass ZEC Price Has A Lot Of Room To Grow Zcash trades at $671, sitting just below the $700 resistance level. The altcoin has gained 65.5% since the start of the month. This reflects strong market participation and growing interest from both retail and institutional traders. If momentum continues, ZEC could rise toward $1,000, which sits 49% above current levels. Achieving this target within 10 days is possible if investor support remains consistent. To reach $1,000, ZEC must first break through and convert the $700, $800, and $900 levels into support. ZEC Price Analysis. Source: TradingView However, if selling pressure increases, ZEC could lose momentum and fall to $600. A deeper correction may push the price toward $520, invalidating the current bullish thesis, leaving the altcoin vulnerable to a crash.
Share
Coinstats2025/11/21 08:00
ETH's "Zhou Tianzi" Dilemma and SOL's "Entrepreneurship Blog" Rise

ETH's "Zhou Tianzi" Dilemma and SOL's "Entrepreneurship Blog" Rise

First, it should be clarified that both I and my organization hold both ETH and SOL, so holding SOL doesn't give me the right to criticize ETH. ETH's problems are long-standing and won't be ignored by the market simply because of previous hype. Ethereum resembles a feudal, international NGO—bureaucratic, decentralized, and focused on procedural justice. Vitalik Buterin is like the Zhou emperor, prematurely losing centralized power, turning L2 into feudal lords, with very limited proportions of their finances being remitted to the central government. It's even somewhat similar to the Commonwealth of Independent States after the collapse of the Soviet Union, or the Commonwealth of Nations after the fall of the British Empire, though even that connection is barely tenuous. Furthermore, will ETH become like IBM? Microsoft, Amazon, and Nvidia are all worth trillions, while IBM is still sitting there: it's a very branded company, exporting technology and empowering others everywhere, but ultimately its business isn't about taking the entire market (the tax model is the strongest business, like Amazon taxing merchant transactions, and Google taxing global merchants' advertising spending), but rather becoming an organization that licenses tech licenses (and ETH licenses are free, so everyone can use EVM). Another recurring issue is the developer culture where those who are close to the foundation and can flaunt their relationship with it are considered to have "legitimacy" and can enjoy more favor from investors and the community. This centripetal, sycophantic culture runs counter to Ethereum's original mission. Furthermore, I overheard some private conversations among major Wall Street institutions that Wall Street players are coming to ETH for two reasons. Firstly, it's the oldest, most reliable, and reputable public blockchain. Secondly, many of them want to launch permission chains, and ETH's technology in this area has been proven over many years. This approach is essentially using ETH like IBM; it seems that the thinking of Wall Street institutions is remarkably similar to that of Chinese financial institutions. In contrast, Solana exhibits a typical startup team culture—focused, efficient, and with strong execution. Its business model is a unified, integrated system, with a single coin supporting the entire system. Its developer culture resembles Burning Man: young, passionate, and highly experimental, closer to campus hacker culture. From a team and culture perspective, I still feel Solana is more like a multinational tech startup team. Regardless, in the end, everyone is working together to put global assets on the blockchain. Competition is a good thing for all of us.
Share
PANews2025/11/21 09:00