The post California’s Revised Film Production Tax Credit appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. California has extended the film production tax credit through June, 2030, increased the fund to $750 million, and liberalized various provisions. This article provides a summary of the entire credit program incorporating the new provisions. The capitalized words used in this article have the meanings set forth in the glossary at the end. 1. Qualified Picture. The credit only applies to “Qualified Pictures,” which are audio-visual works (now including animated works) that are produced for distribution to the general public in any media and that are one of the following:a. A Feature with a minimum Budget of $1 million.b. A “new” (i.e., never aired or not aired for four years) TV Series produced in California with a minimum Budget of $1 million per episode and licensed for original distribution on basic cable;c. An Independent Film; ord. A TV Series that films a minimum of six episodes outside of California and for which the Production Company certifies to the Commission that availability of the Credit is the primary reason for relocating to California. In addition, to be a “Qualified Picture,” all of the following conditions must be met:a. Either 75% of principal photography must occur wholly within California or 75% of the Budget must be incurred for (i) the payment of services performed within California and (ii) the purchase or rental of property used within California. For a TV Series, this test would be applied to the aggregate production days for all episodes in the TV Series.b. Completion (answer print or digital master) must occur within thirty months of the date on which the Commission approves the initial application.c. The film cannot be a commercial, music video, home video, school project, news program, talk show, game show, sporting event, award show, telethon, reality television program, clip-based program, documentary, variety program, soap… The post California’s Revised Film Production Tax Credit appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. California has extended the film production tax credit through June, 2030, increased the fund to $750 million, and liberalized various provisions. This article provides a summary of the entire credit program incorporating the new provisions. The capitalized words used in this article have the meanings set forth in the glossary at the end. 1. Qualified Picture. The credit only applies to “Qualified Pictures,” which are audio-visual works (now including animated works) that are produced for distribution to the general public in any media and that are one of the following:a. A Feature with a minimum Budget of $1 million.b. A “new” (i.e., never aired or not aired for four years) TV Series produced in California with a minimum Budget of $1 million per episode and licensed for original distribution on basic cable;c. An Independent Film; ord. A TV Series that films a minimum of six episodes outside of California and for which the Production Company certifies to the Commission that availability of the Credit is the primary reason for relocating to California. In addition, to be a “Qualified Picture,” all of the following conditions must be met:a. Either 75% of principal photography must occur wholly within California or 75% of the Budget must be incurred for (i) the payment of services performed within California and (ii) the purchase or rental of property used within California. For a TV Series, this test would be applied to the aggregate production days for all episodes in the TV Series.b. Completion (answer print or digital master) must occur within thirty months of the date on which the Commission approves the initial application.c. The film cannot be a commercial, music video, home video, school project, news program, talk show, game show, sporting event, award show, telethon, reality television program, clip-based program, documentary, variety program, soap…

California’s Revised Film Production Tax Credit

2025/11/20 18:08

California has extended the film production tax credit through June, 2030, increased the fund to $750 million, and liberalized various provisions. This article provides a summary of the entire credit program incorporating the new provisions. The capitalized words used in this article have the meanings set forth in the glossary at the end.

1. Qualified Picture. The credit only applies to “Qualified Pictures,” which are audio-visual works (now including animated works) that are produced for distribution to the general public in any media and that are one of the following:
a. A Feature with a minimum Budget of $1 million.
b. A “new” (i.e., never aired or not aired for four years) TV Series produced in California with a minimum Budget of $1 million per episode and licensed for original distribution on basic cable;
c. An Independent Film; or
d. A TV Series that films a minimum of six episodes outside of California and for which the Production Company certifies to the Commission that availability of the Credit is the primary reason for relocating to California.

In addition, to be a “Qualified Picture,” all of the following conditions must be met:
a. Either 75% of principal photography must occur wholly within California or 75% of the Budget must be incurred for (i) the payment of services performed within California and (ii) the purchase or rental of property used within California. For a TV Series, this test would be applied to the aggregate production days for all episodes in the TV Series.
b. Completion (answer print or digital master) must occur within thirty months of the date on which the Commission approves the initial application.
c. The film cannot be a commercial, music video, home video, school project, news program, talk show, game show, sporting event, award show, telethon, reality television program, clip-based program, documentary, variety program, soap opera, strip show (i.e., multiple segments shot in one day), or pornography.
2. Amount of Credit. In general, the Credit is 35% of Creditable Costs, except that the Credit is 40% of Creditable Costs for (i) Independent Films and (ii) the first year for TV Series that filmed all prior seasons outside of California and for which the Production Company certifies that the Credit is the primary reason for relocating to California. The credit can be increased by up to an additional 10% depending on where production occurs and the residence of the workers. Creditable Costs are limited to $120 million for each Feature (but only $20 million for an Independent Film) and season of a TV Series. Starting with awards made in 2025-26, a production can receive an additional 4% credit if they submit a diversity work plan to the Commission and the Commission determines that the recipient has made a “good-faith effort” to achieve the goals in the work plan. Diversity work plans are now required to include goals broadly reflective of California’s population in terms of race, ethnicity, gender, disability status, and veteran status. The bill also requires inclusion of ZIP Code data related to employees’ primary residences to assess local hiring impacts. There’s also a “Career Pathways Training Program” (for an additional 2% credit) and set safety provisions.
3. Entitlement to Credit. The Credit is an offset against any California income or sales and use tax owed by the Production Company. If the Production Company is a pass-through entity, such as a partnership, an LLC, or an S corporation, the Credit against income taxes passes through to the owners.
4. Limitation on Amount of Total Credits. The Commission is directed to allocate up to $750 million of Credits for each fiscal year (from July 1 through June 30). If any portion of the $750 million of Credits is not used in any given fiscal year, the unused portion carries forward to subsequent years. However, only 8% of Credits each year is to be set aside for Independent Films. The Commission announces the window for submitting applications each year, and the Commission approves Credits for each year on a first-come, first-serve basis until the total Credits for that year are fully allocated. All applications received on the first day will be ordered by lottery, to avoid the need to camp out the night before and a stampede at the door. After the first year’s allotment has been fully allocated, the Commission has the authority to start the process over for applications for the subsequent year.
5. Initial Application. To apply for the Credit, the Production Company must submit an initial application to the Commission containing detailed information set forth in the statute thirty days prior to commencement of principal photography. Principal photography of the film or TV Series must commence during a window commencing after the Commission approves the initial application and ending no later than 180 days after that date (increased to 240 days if the Budget exceeds $100 million), with no more than a 100 day hiatus after such commencement. This means that the Production Company must hold up principal photography until the application is approved. The statute does not impose any time limits for approval on the Commission, but the Commission has indicated that it intends to approve applications promptly, with a target of perhaps two weeks.
The legislation requires feature film and television projects that apply for the credits, which are assigned based on jobs created, to report diversity statistics to the state and designate people to handle misconduct claims. The revised tax credit program would also require applicants to submit their policy prohibiting harassment and retaliation. In addition, major studios would have to report whether they have diversity programs. Applicants who receive the tax credit would help fund a program to train people from underrepresented communities to do “below the line” jobs on film sets.
6. Final Certification. Upon Completion, the Production Company then submits a request for final certification to the Commission setting forth additional detailed information set forth in the statute. Critically, one of the additional items of information requested is the copyright registration number, but it can take up to sixteen months after a copyright registration application is filed with the Copyright Office before a work is registered and the registration number is obtained. One solution to this is to pay the Copyright Office an additional $800 for expedited registration if the Production Company can show an urgent need related to “contractual or financial need,” and a pending state tax credit usually qualifies. The Commission is also required to implement some form of audit before the final Credit is approved.
7. Application to TV Series. The initial and final application process, and the determination of the Budget and Completion, for a TV Series is done by aggregating all episodes in a season.
8. Year of Use of Credit. The Credit is available in the tax year during which the Commission issues the final certificate authorizing the Credit, even if the Creditable Costs are incurred in prior tax years. If the Credit cannot be used in full in the relevant tax year, any excess is carried forward for five subsequent years.
9. Financing the Credit
a. Refundability. Production Companies can now make a one-time election to make the credit refundable. Taxpayers must first apply as much of their credit to their current tax liability as possible before the excess is refundable for that year. They can then elect to make 90% of the remaining total credit allocation refundable, but the use of such credits must be spread across the five taxable years beginning with the year of election.
b. Sale of Credit. The Production Company (and not its owners if it is a pass-through entity) for an Independent Film only (and not any other Qualified Picture) may make one sale of the Credit against income taxes (and not sales or use tax) to another party if, prior to the sale, the Production Company reports certain relevant information set forth in the statute to the Franchise Tax Board. However, the Credit may not be sold more than once, so brokers acting as financiers must be careful to structure the transaction as a “loan,” not a “purchase” and “resale,” of the Credit. As mentioned above, the Credit can be used against any sales and use tax that may be owed by the Production Company, but this provision does not apply to the buyer of the Credit. The sale of Credits for Independent Films is thus the only way to raise actual financing for the production of a film.
10. Glossary. I have taken some literary license here – in part based on interpretive guidance issued by the California Film Commission – in order to make the statute somewhat understandable:
a. “Budget” means an estimate of all expenses incurred with respect to a Qualified Picture during the Production Period. The statute states that the Budget must be the same as the budget used for all other purposes (the drafter must not know that films often have multiple budgets depending on who is asking!). The Budget includes the total budget for a Qualified Picture, including any portion funded by third parties. The Budget is relevant only for purposes of determining if an audio-visual work is a Qualified Picture, and it is not relevant for calculating the amount of the Credit. The Budget can exclude the completion bond fee if needed to come within the permitted caps on the Budget, but then the completion bond fee cannot be a Creditable Cost.
b. “Commission” means the California Film Commission.
c. “Completion” means completion of post-production. This should occur upon completion of the answer print for films and completion of the airmaster for television programs.
d. “Credit” means the California film production tax credit.
e. “Creditable Costs” means the expenses to which the Credit applies, which are expenses in the Budget incurred in connection with a Qualified Picture only for (i) the purchase or lease in California of tangible personal property used within California and (ii) all compensation for services rendered in California, excluding:
i. Payments to the Production Company or its affiliates;
ii. Expenses relating to the acquisition, development, financing, overhead, marketing, promotion, or distribution of the Qualified Picture; and
iii. Expenses relating to writers, directors, music directors, music composers, music supervisors, producers, and actors (other than extras).
f. “Feature” is a film intended for commercial distribution that has a running time of at least seventy-five minutes in length.
g. “Independent Film” means a Feature with a minimum Budget of $1 million if the Production Company for such film is not publicly traded and is not more than 30% owned, directly or indirectly, by publicly traded companies.
h. “Production Company” means the entity that pays the Creditable Costs.
i. “Production Period” means a period beginning from the earlier of the date (i) that there is a binding agreement for funding of the entire Budget and (ii) the Qualified Picture is greenlit (not defined), and which period continues until Completion. For TV Series, the Production Period would be determined with respect to the entire TV Series.
j. “Qualified Picture” has the meaning set forth in Paragraph 1.
k. “TV Series” means a television series with episodes at least forty minutes long.

Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/schuylermoore/2025/11/20/californias-revised-film-production-tax-credit/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Zcash (ZEC) Rips While Bitcoin Dips — Can This Privacy Coin Run 49% Higher

Zcash (ZEC) Rips While Bitcoin Dips — Can This Privacy Coin Run 49% Higher

Zcash has seen a strong surge in recent weeks as demand for privacy coins grows across the market. ZEC’s rise stands out due to its limited correlation with Bitcoin, allowing it to perform independently during periods of volatility.  This unique behavior has fueled renewed interest and helped strengthen ZEC’s upward momentum. Zcash Is Independent Zcash’s correlation with Bitcoin currently sits at -0.78, signaling a strong negative relationship. This means ZEC is moving in the opposite direction of BTC, which is highly beneficial at a time when Bitcoin is trading near $90,000 after several days of decline. ZEC’s ability to decouple from BTC enables it to avoid broader market pullbacks. This negative correlation has remained intact since early November, reinforcing ZEC’s resilience. As long as the correlation stays below zero, Zcash will be less vulnerable to Bitcoin-driven sell-offs.  Want more token insights like this? Sign up for Editor Harsh Notariya’s Daily Crypto Newsletter here. ZEC Correlation With Bitcoin. Source: TradingView Macro indicators also suggest favorable conditions. Zcash’s liquidation map reveals that short sellers should approach the market with caution. If ZEC climbs to $788, roughly $51 million worth of short positions could be liquidated. This creates an additional incentive for traders to avoid bearish strategies. Large liquidation clusters often discourage short positions and can fuel further upside as forced liquidations amplify price movement. For ZEC, reaching these levels would disrupt bearish sentiment and provide additional support for continued appreciation. Zcash Liquidation Map. Source: Coinglass ZEC Price Has A Lot Of Room To Grow Zcash trades at $671, sitting just below the $700 resistance level. The altcoin has gained 65.5% since the start of the month. This reflects strong market participation and growing interest from both retail and institutional traders. If momentum continues, ZEC could rise toward $1,000, which sits 49% above current levels. Achieving this target within 10 days is possible if investor support remains consistent. To reach $1,000, ZEC must first break through and convert the $700, $800, and $900 levels into support. ZEC Price Analysis. Source: TradingView However, if selling pressure increases, ZEC could lose momentum and fall to $600. A deeper correction may push the price toward $520, invalidating the current bullish thesis, leaving the altcoin vulnerable to a crash.
Share
Coinstats2025/11/21 08:00
The $40 Million ‘Free Money’ Glitch in Crypto Prediction Markets

The $40 Million ‘Free Money’ Glitch in Crypto Prediction Markets

The post The $40 Million ‘Free Money’ Glitch in Crypto Prediction Markets appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In brief Researchers found $40 million in “risk-free” profits from mispriced markets on Polymarket in one year. Prices on some markets didn’t add up to 100%, letting traders lock in guaranteed gains. The same inefficiencies likely exist on other platforms like Myriad and Kalshi, though arbitrageurs help correct them. A new academic paper suggests there’s been a steady stream of “free money” lying around on Polymarket—and smart traders have been scooping it up. The paper, Unravelling the Probabilistic Forest: Arbitrage in Prediction Markets, is the most detailed look yet at how mispricing creeps into crypto’s most popular prediction platform. The researchers combed through a year of data, from April 2024 to April 2025, and found thousands of instances where market prices simply didn’t add up. In some cases, the prices of “Yes” and “No” shares in a single market didn’t sum to one dollar as they theoretically should, creating a risk-free profit for anyone quick enough to pounce.  In other cases, the mispricing was more subtle, involving logically related markets. For example, a market on “Trump wins the presidency” might trade at very different odds than “Republican wins the presidency,” even though those outcomes are tightly linked. By buying and selling combinations of these contracts, a savvy trader could lock in a profit no matter what happens. The researchers estimate more than $40 million in profits have already been pulled from the system by arbitrageurs, traders who specialize in sniffing out and exploiting these kinds of inconsistencies. Far from being a theoretical curiosity, this is a live and lucrative business model. Is this pattern true across all prediction markets? What’s striking is how common these opportunities are. The study found more than 7,000 markets with measurable mispricing, many in highly liquid, closely watched contracts. “Prediction markets are often treated…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 14:34
ETH's "Zhou Tianzi" Dilemma and SOL's "Entrepreneurship Blog" Rise

ETH's "Zhou Tianzi" Dilemma and SOL's "Entrepreneurship Blog" Rise

First, it should be clarified that both I and my organization hold both ETH and SOL, so holding SOL doesn't give me the right to criticize ETH. ETH's problems are long-standing and won't be ignored by the market simply because of previous hype. Ethereum resembles a feudal, international NGO—bureaucratic, decentralized, and focused on procedural justice. Vitalik Buterin is like the Zhou emperor, prematurely losing centralized power, turning L2 into feudal lords, with very limited proportions of their finances being remitted to the central government. It's even somewhat similar to the Commonwealth of Independent States after the collapse of the Soviet Union, or the Commonwealth of Nations after the fall of the British Empire, though even that connection is barely tenuous. Furthermore, will ETH become like IBM? Microsoft, Amazon, and Nvidia are all worth trillions, while IBM is still sitting there: it's a very branded company, exporting technology and empowering others everywhere, but ultimately its business isn't about taking the entire market (the tax model is the strongest business, like Amazon taxing merchant transactions, and Google taxing global merchants' advertising spending), but rather becoming an organization that licenses tech licenses (and ETH licenses are free, so everyone can use EVM). Another recurring issue is the developer culture where those who are close to the foundation and can flaunt their relationship with it are considered to have "legitimacy" and can enjoy more favor from investors and the community. This centripetal, sycophantic culture runs counter to Ethereum's original mission. Furthermore, I overheard some private conversations among major Wall Street institutions that Wall Street players are coming to ETH for two reasons. Firstly, it's the oldest, most reliable, and reputable public blockchain. Secondly, many of them want to launch permission chains, and ETH's technology in this area has been proven over many years. This approach is essentially using ETH like IBM; it seems that the thinking of Wall Street institutions is remarkably similar to that of Chinese financial institutions. In contrast, Solana exhibits a typical startup team culture—focused, efficient, and with strong execution. Its business model is a unified, integrated system, with a single coin supporting the entire system. Its developer culture resembles Burning Man: young, passionate, and highly experimental, closer to campus hacker culture. From a team and culture perspective, I still feel Solana is more like a multinational tech startup team. Regardless, in the end, everyone is working together to put global assets on the blockchain. Competition is a good thing for all of us.
Share
PANews2025/11/21 09:00