The post The Space Force Has Its Vector. Now It Must Outpace The Threat. appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Gen. Saltzman, Chief of Space Operations for the U.S. Space Force Spacepower Conference Oped General Chance Saltzman’s newly released Vector 2025 is the clearest articulation yet of the U.S. Space Force’s purpose, priorities, and philosophy. It captures the seriousness of today’s contested space environment and reflects a significant evolution from the benign operating conditions of earlier eras. Saltzman rightly emphasizes that America must be prepared not only to operate in space but also to deter, contest, and, when necessary, control the domain against capable and ambitious competitors. His focus on competitive endurance – built on space domain awareness, resilience through disaggregation, and a credible counter-space posture establishes a strong conceptual foundation. As strategies go, Vector offers exactly the kind of high-level orientation a young service needs. But strategy is only the very beginning. To deliver on the outcomes envisioned in Vector, the Space Force will need to lean much more forcefully – with the zeal of a religious convert – head-on into three areas where commercial innovation and operational realities are already accelerating at warp speed. Fully Embracing the Space Force’s Identity as the First Digital Military Service One of Space Force’s defining attributes is that it is, at its core, a digital service. More than any other military branch, it is shaped by software, networks, and decision-speed rather than by traditional measures of platforms or force structure. Fully realizing this identity means embracing a shift that surpasses even the transition the Air Force experienced after its creation in 1947. Domain control in space will increasingly depend on rapidly deployed, continuously updated, secure, mesh-networked systems that operate as a distributed compute layer in orbit. Autonomy, crosslinks, data fusion, and real-time inference will deliver operational advantage far more effectively than the performance of any individual satellite. The Space Force has already… The post The Space Force Has Its Vector. Now It Must Outpace The Threat. appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Gen. Saltzman, Chief of Space Operations for the U.S. Space Force Spacepower Conference Oped General Chance Saltzman’s newly released Vector 2025 is the clearest articulation yet of the U.S. Space Force’s purpose, priorities, and philosophy. It captures the seriousness of today’s contested space environment and reflects a significant evolution from the benign operating conditions of earlier eras. Saltzman rightly emphasizes that America must be prepared not only to operate in space but also to deter, contest, and, when necessary, control the domain against capable and ambitious competitors. His focus on competitive endurance – built on space domain awareness, resilience through disaggregation, and a credible counter-space posture establishes a strong conceptual foundation. As strategies go, Vector offers exactly the kind of high-level orientation a young service needs. But strategy is only the very beginning. To deliver on the outcomes envisioned in Vector, the Space Force will need to lean much more forcefully – with the zeal of a religious convert – head-on into three areas where commercial innovation and operational realities are already accelerating at warp speed. Fully Embracing the Space Force’s Identity as the First Digital Military Service One of Space Force’s defining attributes is that it is, at its core, a digital service. More than any other military branch, it is shaped by software, networks, and decision-speed rather than by traditional measures of platforms or force structure. Fully realizing this identity means embracing a shift that surpasses even the transition the Air Force experienced after its creation in 1947. Domain control in space will increasingly depend on rapidly deployed, continuously updated, secure, mesh-networked systems that operate as a distributed compute layer in orbit. Autonomy, crosslinks, data fusion, and real-time inference will deliver operational advantage far more effectively than the performance of any individual satellite. The Space Force has already…

The Space Force Has Its Vector. Now It Must Outpace The Threat.

2025/11/21 07:15

Gen. Saltzman, Chief of Space Operations for the U.S. Space Force

Spacepower Conference Oped

General Chance Saltzman’s newly released Vector 2025 is the clearest articulation yet of the U.S. Space Force’s purpose, priorities, and philosophy. It captures the seriousness of today’s contested space environment and reflects a significant evolution from the benign operating conditions of earlier eras. Saltzman rightly emphasizes that America must be prepared not only to operate in space but also to deter, contest, and, when necessary, control the domain against capable and ambitious competitors.

His focus on competitive endurance – built on space domain awareness, resilience through disaggregation, and a credible counter-space posture establishes a strong conceptual foundation. As strategies go, Vector offers exactly the kind of high-level orientation a young service needs.

But strategy is only the very beginning. To deliver on the outcomes envisioned in Vector, the Space Force will need to lean much more forcefully – with the zeal of a religious convert – head-on into three areas where commercial innovation and operational realities are already accelerating at warp speed.

Fully Embracing the Space Force’s Identity as the First Digital Military Service

One of Space Force’s defining attributes is that it is, at its core, a digital service. More than any other military branch, it is shaped by software, networks, and decision-speed rather than by traditional measures of platforms or force structure. Fully realizing this identity means embracing a shift that surpasses even the transition the Air Force experienced after its creation in 1947.

Domain control in space will increasingly depend on rapidly deployed, continuously updated, secure, mesh-networked systems that operate as a distributed compute layer in orbit. Autonomy, crosslinks, data fusion, and real-time inference will deliver operational advantage far more effectively than the performance of any individual satellite.

The Space Force has already begun moving in this direction, but achieving a digital-service vision will require the adoption of commercial-grade practices. Continuous integration, iterative software deployment, secure-by-design cyber hardening, and architectures that treat satellites as intelligent, interdependent nodes – not isolated programs of record.

In short: the nation that controls the data layer, not merely the orbital layer, will control the domain.

Aligning Acquisition Tempo With the Demands of Competitive Endurance

Since its inception, Saltzman’s emphasis on competitive endurance has been well placed. Endurance in a dynamic threat environment though is inseparable from tempo – the speed at which the United States can deploy, learn, and improve.

Even the Secretary of War acknowledges how disastrously our current acquisition system struggles under its own weight to keep pace, and the challenge is magnified in a hybrid space era. Commercial space is the future, but the Space Force must be vigilant in preventing self-defeating business decisions while it remains such a dominant buyer inside commercial innovation cycles. No strategy can succeed if our Cold War iteration loop lags so far behind our competitors. But we must guard against inadvertently backing into an approach that could result in a “winner take all” mindset born in the tech sector and misapplied to national security.

The solution is not another round of analysis, modeling, and simulation. Instead, the Space Force should be empowered to proliferate and operate what exists today, enhance it through software tomorrow, and fold commercial and government funded breakthroughs into the architecture as they emerge. The Space Development Agency is demonstrating that this is possible, to the applause of the Space Force’s advocates on Capitol Hill. Its model of iterative development, rapid deployment, and continuous feedback and updates must now become the rule, not the exception.

Competitive endurance is achieved by fielding quickly and operating tirelessly, all while learning and updating continuously. The traditional linear, requirements-driven process simply cannot deliver at the tempo the strategy demands.

Safeguarding the Space Force’s Core Contributions to Joint Warfighting

As the Space Force modernizes and expands its role in higher-end orbital competition, it must remain fully committed to the hybrid architecture that underpins the joint force’s daily operations: precision navigation and timing (PNT), intelligence and surveillance, missile warning and tracking, secured global communications, and resilient ground infrastructure.

These functions are the connective tissue of all modern warfare. There is no commercial backstop, no “Space Merchant Marine” that can assume these responsibilities in crisis or conflict. Ensuring these missions stay robust and globally available – while evolving alongside commercial capabilities – will remain central to the nation’s ability to fight and win.

Strategic competition in space cannot be separated from tactical realities on the ground. A secure and accessible orbital domain has little meaning if soldiers, sailors, airmen, Marines, and Guardians lack the positioning, communication, and situational awareness they need to locate, close with, and defeat the enemy.

Vector is the vision. The Space Force must match it with execution.

Vector clearly identifies where the Space Force needs to go. Its core ideas – endurance, resilience, awareness, and credible deterrence – are exactly what this moment demands. The next step is execution that outpaces the threat.

Success in the competition for space superiority will hinge on how quickly the United States can field new architectures, integrate autonomy, and harness data as the decisive element of modern operations. These are the areas where America’s commercial sector is strongest, and where partnership can accelerate progress right now.

In the end, it will be the actor that moves fastest, not the one that writes the most elaborate plans, that shapes the future of space. Vector points the way. Now the Space Force must seize the momentum and deliver at speed.

Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/charlesbeames/2025/11/20/the-space-force-has-its-vector-now-it-must-outpace-the-threat/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Zcash (ZEC) Rips While Bitcoin Dips — Can This Privacy Coin Run 49% Higher

Zcash (ZEC) Rips While Bitcoin Dips — Can This Privacy Coin Run 49% Higher

Zcash has seen a strong surge in recent weeks as demand for privacy coins grows across the market. ZEC’s rise stands out due to its limited correlation with Bitcoin, allowing it to perform independently during periods of volatility.  This unique behavior has fueled renewed interest and helped strengthen ZEC’s upward momentum. Zcash Is Independent Zcash’s correlation with Bitcoin currently sits at -0.78, signaling a strong negative relationship. This means ZEC is moving in the opposite direction of BTC, which is highly beneficial at a time when Bitcoin is trading near $90,000 after several days of decline. ZEC’s ability to decouple from BTC enables it to avoid broader market pullbacks. This negative correlation has remained intact since early November, reinforcing ZEC’s resilience. As long as the correlation stays below zero, Zcash will be less vulnerable to Bitcoin-driven sell-offs.  Want more token insights like this? Sign up for Editor Harsh Notariya’s Daily Crypto Newsletter here. ZEC Correlation With Bitcoin. Source: TradingView Macro indicators also suggest favorable conditions. Zcash’s liquidation map reveals that short sellers should approach the market with caution. If ZEC climbs to $788, roughly $51 million worth of short positions could be liquidated. This creates an additional incentive for traders to avoid bearish strategies. Large liquidation clusters often discourage short positions and can fuel further upside as forced liquidations amplify price movement. For ZEC, reaching these levels would disrupt bearish sentiment and provide additional support for continued appreciation. Zcash Liquidation Map. Source: Coinglass ZEC Price Has A Lot Of Room To Grow Zcash trades at $671, sitting just below the $700 resistance level. The altcoin has gained 65.5% since the start of the month. This reflects strong market participation and growing interest from both retail and institutional traders. If momentum continues, ZEC could rise toward $1,000, which sits 49% above current levels. Achieving this target within 10 days is possible if investor support remains consistent. To reach $1,000, ZEC must first break through and convert the $700, $800, and $900 levels into support. ZEC Price Analysis. Source: TradingView However, if selling pressure increases, ZEC could lose momentum and fall to $600. A deeper correction may push the price toward $520, invalidating the current bullish thesis, leaving the altcoin vulnerable to a crash.
Share
Coinstats2025/11/21 08:00
The $40 Million ‘Free Money’ Glitch in Crypto Prediction Markets

The $40 Million ‘Free Money’ Glitch in Crypto Prediction Markets

The post The $40 Million ‘Free Money’ Glitch in Crypto Prediction Markets appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In brief Researchers found $40 million in “risk-free” profits from mispriced markets on Polymarket in one year. Prices on some markets didn’t add up to 100%, letting traders lock in guaranteed gains. The same inefficiencies likely exist on other platforms like Myriad and Kalshi, though arbitrageurs help correct them. A new academic paper suggests there’s been a steady stream of “free money” lying around on Polymarket—and smart traders have been scooping it up. The paper, Unravelling the Probabilistic Forest: Arbitrage in Prediction Markets, is the most detailed look yet at how mispricing creeps into crypto’s most popular prediction platform. The researchers combed through a year of data, from April 2024 to April 2025, and found thousands of instances where market prices simply didn’t add up. In some cases, the prices of “Yes” and “No” shares in a single market didn’t sum to one dollar as they theoretically should, creating a risk-free profit for anyone quick enough to pounce.  In other cases, the mispricing was more subtle, involving logically related markets. For example, a market on “Trump wins the presidency” might trade at very different odds than “Republican wins the presidency,” even though those outcomes are tightly linked. By buying and selling combinations of these contracts, a savvy trader could lock in a profit no matter what happens. The researchers estimate more than $40 million in profits have already been pulled from the system by arbitrageurs, traders who specialize in sniffing out and exploiting these kinds of inconsistencies. Far from being a theoretical curiosity, this is a live and lucrative business model. Is this pattern true across all prediction markets? What’s striking is how common these opportunities are. The study found more than 7,000 markets with measurable mispricing, many in highly liquid, closely watched contracts. “Prediction markets are often treated…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 14:34
ETH's "Zhou Tianzi" Dilemma and SOL's "Entrepreneurship Blog" Rise

ETH's "Zhou Tianzi" Dilemma and SOL's "Entrepreneurship Blog" Rise

First, it should be clarified that both I and my organization hold both ETH and SOL, so holding SOL doesn't give me the right to criticize ETH. ETH's problems are long-standing and won't be ignored by the market simply because of previous hype. Ethereum resembles a feudal, international NGO—bureaucratic, decentralized, and focused on procedural justice. Vitalik Buterin is like the Zhou emperor, prematurely losing centralized power, turning L2 into feudal lords, with very limited proportions of their finances being remitted to the central government. It's even somewhat similar to the Commonwealth of Independent States after the collapse of the Soviet Union, or the Commonwealth of Nations after the fall of the British Empire, though even that connection is barely tenuous. Furthermore, will ETH become like IBM? Microsoft, Amazon, and Nvidia are all worth trillions, while IBM is still sitting there: it's a very branded company, exporting technology and empowering others everywhere, but ultimately its business isn't about taking the entire market (the tax model is the strongest business, like Amazon taxing merchant transactions, and Google taxing global merchants' advertising spending), but rather becoming an organization that licenses tech licenses (and ETH licenses are free, so everyone can use EVM). Another recurring issue is the developer culture where those who are close to the foundation and can flaunt their relationship with it are considered to have "legitimacy" and can enjoy more favor from investors and the community. This centripetal, sycophantic culture runs counter to Ethereum's original mission. Furthermore, I overheard some private conversations among major Wall Street institutions that Wall Street players are coming to ETH for two reasons. Firstly, it's the oldest, most reliable, and reputable public blockchain. Secondly, many of them want to launch permission chains, and ETH's technology in this area has been proven over many years. This approach is essentially using ETH like IBM; it seems that the thinking of Wall Street institutions is remarkably similar to that of Chinese financial institutions. In contrast, Solana exhibits a typical startup team culture—focused, efficient, and with strong execution. Its business model is a unified, integrated system, with a single coin supporting the entire system. Its developer culture resembles Burning Man: young, passionate, and highly experimental, closer to campus hacker culture. From a team and culture perspective, I still feel Solana is more like a multinational tech startup team. Regardless, in the end, everyone is working together to put global assets on the blockchain. Competition is a good thing for all of us.
Share
PANews2025/11/21 09:00