The post Issuer–investor disconnect is stalling tokenization: report appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Homepage > News > Finance > Issuer–investor disconnect is stalling tokenization: report A gulf between what mainstream investors prioritize and what the issuers of tokenized assets currently offer is creating an adoption gap that’s stalling tokenization, a new report says. Titled “Bridging the Adoption Gap: Aligning Digital Asset Offerings with Buy-Side Requirements,” the report dug into the disconnect between the two factions, which has limited tokenization to a niche audience, mostly comprised of digital asset enthusiasts. It was published by the Investment Association (IA), a U.K industry lobby group whose members manage over $13 trillion in assets, and the Investment Management Association of Singapore, its Singaporean counterpart. The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) and the U.K’s Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) were also involved in drafting the report. A clear disconnect Tokenization is transforming the financial industry, with some projecting that it could unlock up to $23.4 trillion in the global economy by 2033. It enables faster settlement, allows asset managers to embed rule-based logic directly into the tokens, streamlines collateral management, and avails investment products to a vast new market through asset fractionalization. However, the report found that the most active client segment for tokenized assets remains the ‘crypto’ natives. This client base is limited, and for tokenization to truly take off, it needs to tap into the mainstream segment, especially institutional investors. Issuers can only appeal to this market by “adapting to very different needs and expectations.” “The tokenised asset market currently suffers from a fundamental disconnect between what issuers build, how sell-side intermediaries operate, and what investors – mainly institutional – need. This misalignment has created an “adoption gap” where promising technology fails to achieve meaningful adoption, limiting the transformative potential of tokenisation,” the report says. Issuers of tokenized products continue to prioritize technological differentiation and rapid market… The post Issuer–investor disconnect is stalling tokenization: report appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Homepage > News > Finance > Issuer–investor disconnect is stalling tokenization: report A gulf between what mainstream investors prioritize and what the issuers of tokenized assets currently offer is creating an adoption gap that’s stalling tokenization, a new report says. Titled “Bridging the Adoption Gap: Aligning Digital Asset Offerings with Buy-Side Requirements,” the report dug into the disconnect between the two factions, which has limited tokenization to a niche audience, mostly comprised of digital asset enthusiasts. It was published by the Investment Association (IA), a U.K industry lobby group whose members manage over $13 trillion in assets, and the Investment Management Association of Singapore, its Singaporean counterpart. The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) and the U.K’s Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) were also involved in drafting the report. A clear disconnect Tokenization is transforming the financial industry, with some projecting that it could unlock up to $23.4 trillion in the global economy by 2033. It enables faster settlement, allows asset managers to embed rule-based logic directly into the tokens, streamlines collateral management, and avails investment products to a vast new market through asset fractionalization. However, the report found that the most active client segment for tokenized assets remains the ‘crypto’ natives. This client base is limited, and for tokenization to truly take off, it needs to tap into the mainstream segment, especially institutional investors. Issuers can only appeal to this market by “adapting to very different needs and expectations.” “The tokenised asset market currently suffers from a fundamental disconnect between what issuers build, how sell-side intermediaries operate, and what investors – mainly institutional – need. This misalignment has created an “adoption gap” where promising technology fails to achieve meaningful adoption, limiting the transformative potential of tokenisation,” the report says. Issuers of tokenized products continue to prioritize technological differentiation and rapid market…

Issuer–investor disconnect is stalling tokenization: report

2025/11/21 14:03

A gulf between what mainstream investors prioritize and what the issuers of tokenized assets currently offer is creating an adoption gap that’s stalling tokenization, a new report says.

Titled “Bridging the Adoption Gap: Aligning Digital Asset Offerings with Buy-Side Requirements,” the report dug into the disconnect between the two factions, which has limited tokenization to a niche audience, mostly comprised of digital asset enthusiasts.

It was published by the Investment Association (IA), a U.K industry lobby group whose members manage over $13 trillion in assets, and the Investment Management Association of Singapore, its Singaporean counterpart. The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) and the U.K’s Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) were also involved in drafting the report.

A clear disconnect

Tokenization is transforming the financial industry, with some projecting that it could unlock up to $23.4 trillion in the global economy by 2033. It enables faster settlement, allows asset managers to embed rule-based logic directly into the tokens, streamlines collateral management, and avails investment products to a vast new market through asset fractionalization.

However, the report found that the most active client segment for tokenized assets remains the ‘crypto’ natives. This client base is limited, and for tokenization to truly take off, it needs to tap into the mainstream segment, especially institutional investors. Issuers can only appeal to this market by “adapting to very different needs and expectations.”

“The tokenised asset market currently suffers from a fundamental disconnect between what issuers build, how sell-side intermediaries operate, and what investors – mainly institutional – need. This misalignment has created an “adoption gap” where promising technology fails to achieve meaningful adoption, limiting the transformative potential of tokenisation,” the report says.

Issuers of tokenized products continue to prioritize technological differentiation and rapid market entry, with their strategies informed by pressure from their backers and competition with other issuers. This culminates in an innovation trap where “technological sophistication becomes an end in itself rather than a means to solve genuine challenges.”

This creates a disconnect with institutional investors who prioritize integration with existing portfolio systems, standardized accounting formats, and familiar custody arrangements. They also value clear oversight standards, with the financial sector being among the most stringently regulated.

Source: Investment Association

“Issuers may assume that demonstrating cost savings or operational efficiencies will drive adoption, without recognising that institutional investors take individual investment decisions, including the degree to which a product is regulated, its liquidity, the operational infrastructure the costs of the product,” says the report.

This mismatch in priorities leaves issuers touting benefits such as real-time settlement and 24/7 trading to a client base with different priorities, stalling adoption.

The two industry groups believe this has been the primary hurdle to adoption by institutional investors, a group whose absence has limited secondary market liquidity. This, in turn, leaves digital currency natives to dominate the market, further reinforcing the belief that tokenized assets are speculative instruments.

Japan’s SBI launches institutional tokenization company

Elsewhere, Japanese financial services giant SBI (NASDAQ: SBHGF) has launched a new company—SBI Onchain—targeting tokenization of real-world assets by institutions.

SBI Onchain is a joint venture between the Tokyo-based conglomerate and DigiFT, an exchange focused on institution-grade tokenized RWAs.

The new venture will prioritize professional investors and is reportedly developing tokenization technology robust enough to handle trillions in real-world assets. It’s also developing custodial products and risk management frameworks for prospective clients.

While its primary target will be Japanese institutions, SBI Onchain intends to partner with asset managers globally to extend the coverage of its on-chain market to other jurisdictions.

International expansion will be greatly aided by DigiFT’s regional footprint. The company has operating licenses in Singapore and Hong Kong, enabling it to host tokenized assets for global giants including UBS, Invesco, and Wellington Management.

SBI joins a host of Japanese companies rolling out tokenized products, including the country’s largest bank, MUFG (NASDAQ: MUFG), which announced it would be tokenizing real estate for retail investors earlier this year.

MUFG is also the founder of Progmat, a cross-industry tokenization platform that intends to roll out tokenized stocks next year.

Watch: Tim Draper talks tokenization with Kurt Wuckert Jr.

frameborder=”0″ allow=”accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share” referrerpolicy=”strict-origin-when-cross-origin” allowfullscreen>

Source: https://coingeek.com/issuer-investor-disconnect-is-stalling-tokenization-report/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Understanding the Ethereum Interoperability Layer (EIL): Bridging L2 Fragmentation and Building a Seamless Cross-Chain Experience

Understanding the Ethereum Interoperability Layer (EIL): Bridging L2 Fragmentation and Building a Seamless Cross-Chain Experience

Author: Pan Zhixiong Ethereum has successfully addressed the scaling issue over the past few years by deploying multiple Layer 2 solutions, such as Arbitrum, Optimism, and Base, resulting in reduced transaction costs and increased efficiency. However, this has led to a fragmented user experience: each L2 network acts like an isolated island, with users facing cumbersome steps, different bridging protocols, and complex asset and gas management when crossing chains. To address this pain point, the Ethereum core team recently proposed the Ethereum Interop Layer (EIL). To understand EIL, we first need to review its foundation—ERC-4337. ERC-4337 is an account abstraction standard proposed by Ethereum. It requires no changes to the underlying Ethereum protocol, implementing a new type of account structure—the smart account—simply by deploying smart contracts. This type of account not only supports advanced features such as social recovery, multisignature, and batch operations, but also allows for gas payments using ERC-20 tokens via smart contracts. However, despite the many technological innovations brought by ERC-4337, its adoption in practice remains limited. Fragmented user experience, difficulties in multi-chain collaboration, high gas costs, and ecosystem compatibility issues all restrict the widespread adoption of 4337. The EIL was developed to address these issues on top of ERC-4337. EIL is an additional multi-chain interoperability protocol built upon the ERC-4337 framework . It extends the single-chain account abstraction to multi-chain account interoperability, enabling a seamless experience across multiple L2 networks. Specifically, EIL implements two important innovations: one-signature multi-chain operations (bulk authorization) and a competitive funding mechanism for cross-chain liquidity providers (XLPs). The first innovation, bulk authorization , allows users to authorize multiple operations across multiple L2 networks with a single signature. Specifically, the wallet first constructs its own UserOperation on each relevant chain, then integrates these operations into a Merkle tree. Users only need to sign the root of the tree once. When a smart account on each chain verifies a received UserOperation, it only needs to verify that it belongs to the Merkle tree and that the signature is valid to execute the operation. This approach significantly simplifies the cross-chain operation process for users. The second innovation, the auction-based funding mechanism, introduces a role called Cross-chain Liquidity Provider (XLP). XLPs are responsible for providing asset transfer and gas payment services between different chains. When a user locks assets on the source chain and submits a cross-chain request, multiple XLPs can bid on the request through on-chain auction. The XLP that wins the bid provides a cross-chain asset transfer voucher, allowing the user to directly obtain funds and gas payments on the target chain to complete the required cross-chain operation. Only after the transaction is completed will the XLP claim the user's previously locked assets on the source chain. To ensure security and fairness, XLPs must be staked on the Ethereum mainnet (L1) and subject to a strict dispute arbitration mechanism. If an XLP violates the rules, the staked assets will be forfeited, thus ensuring its integrity through economic incentives . It's worth emphasizing that EIL doesn't require any changes to the consensus protocol of the Ethereum mainnet or L2 network during its implementation . All implementations are based on smart contracts and the existing ERC-4337 account abstraction framework. This design not only reduces the difficulty of implementation but also significantly reduces the security risks the chain itself may face. Of course, this design also shifts the pressure and complexity to the wallet and off-chain infrastructure . The wallet needs to support complex multi-chain transaction construction, one-signature multi-chain verification, interaction mechanisms with CrossChainPaymaster and XLP, and needs to provide a simple and user-friendly interface. The off-chain infrastructure, on the other hand, needs to build a robust auction market, monitor XLP fund flows in real time, and manage risks. Ultimately, EIL provides users with a single-chain-like experience. In the future, when users open EIL-enabled wallets, they will no longer need to frequently switch chains, manage cross-chain assets, or endure lengthy cross-chain waits and cumbersome procedures. All complex cross-chain details will be completed automatically outside the user's view, gradually unifying the user experience across the entire Ethereum L2 ecosystem and truly realizing the vision of multi-chain integration and seamless interoperability. EIL also opens up a whole new possibility for the entire Ethereum ecosystem: it not only solves the cross-chain user experience problem, but more importantly, it truly allows multiple L2 networks to "become one" in a secure, decentralized, and trustless way.
Share
PANews2025/11/21 14:00
Bitcoin 8% Gains Already Make September 2025 Its Second Best

Bitcoin 8% Gains Already Make September 2025 Its Second Best

The post Bitcoin 8% Gains Already Make September 2025 Its Second Best appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key points: Bitcoin is bucking seasonality trends by adding 8%, making this September its best since 2012. September 2025 would need to see 20% upside to become Bitcoin’s strongest ever. BTC price volatility is at levels rarely seen before in an unusual bull cycle. Bitcoin (BTC) has gained more this September than any year since 2012, a new bull market record. Historical price data from CoinGlass and BiTBO confirms that at 8%, Bitcoin’s September 2025 upside is its second-best ever. Bitcoin avoiding “Rektember” with 8% gains September is traditionally Bitcoin’s weakest month, with average losses of around 8%. BTC/USD monthly returns (screenshot). Source: CoinGlass This year, the stakes are high for BTC price seasonality, as historical patterns demand the next bull market peak and other risk assets set repeated new all-time highs. While both gold and the S&P 500 are in price discovery, BTC/USD has coiled throughout September after setting new highs of its own the month prior. Even at “just” 8%, however, this September’s performance is currently enough to make it Bitcoin’s strongest in 13 years. The only time that the ninth month of the year was more profitable for Bitcoin bulls was in 2012, when BTC/USD gained about 19.8%. Last year, upside topped out at 7.3%. BTC/USD monthly returns. Source: BiTBO BTC price volatility vanishes The figures underscore a highly unusual bull market peak year for Bitcoin. Related: BTC ‘pricing in’ what’s coming: 5 things to know in Bitcoin this week Unlike previous bull markets, BTC price volatility has died off in 2025, against the expectations of longtime market participants based on prior performance. CoinGlass data shows volatility dropping to levels not seen in over a decade, with a particularly sharp drop from April onward. Bitcoin historical volatility (screenshot). Source: CoinGlass Onchain analytics firm Glassnode, meanwhile, highlights the…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 11:09