The post Institutions pause Bitcoin, Ethereum exposure – This is Solana’s gain appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Takeaways Why are institutions pulling back from Bitcoin and Ethereum spot ETFs? Stablecoin inflows and ETF holdings have dropped sharply as institutions cut exposure amid weaker macro conditions. Which asset remains an institutional favorite despite the sell-off? Solana ETFs, which have recorded over two weeks of continuous inflows and now hold $714.8 million in net assets. Institutional investors, otherwise known as traditional investors, are currently holding back on Exchange-Traded Fund (ETF) exposure. The decline has become more notable over the past week, particularly for Bitcoin and Ethereum. However, a few cases remain outliers, with Solana standing out. Institutional investors tend to have a significant impact on the market, and this shift could serve as an important indicator of broader market sentiment. Stablecoin inflows drop Institutional investors are gradually stepping back from the market. This movement is reflected in on-chain stablecoin volume, which has long been linked to institutional inflows and outflows. The volume has now declined. This drop is also visible in broader market performance, as Bitcoin [BTC] continues to hover around the $91,000 level, weeks after it reached an all-time high above $126,000. Source: Alphractal The decline in stablecoin inflows suggests reduced swapping activity into more volatile crypto ETFs, particularly Bitcoin and Ethereum [ETH], which lead the market with net values of $117.34 billion and $12.84 billion, respectively. In addition, institutional investors have downsized their exposure further, closing positions across both Bitcoin and Ethereum spot ETFs worth $682.64 million in the past day alone. On the 18th of November, total outflows reached $508.58 million, followed by $1.17 billion at the start of the week. This confirmed that a majority of institutional participants in the market are currently leaning bearish. Shawn Young, chief analyst at MEXC, noted that macroeconomic conditions are driving the institutional sell-off, particularly as expectations for a… The post Institutions pause Bitcoin, Ethereum exposure – This is Solana’s gain appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Takeaways Why are institutions pulling back from Bitcoin and Ethereum spot ETFs? Stablecoin inflows and ETF holdings have dropped sharply as institutions cut exposure amid weaker macro conditions. Which asset remains an institutional favorite despite the sell-off? Solana ETFs, which have recorded over two weeks of continuous inflows and now hold $714.8 million in net assets. Institutional investors, otherwise known as traditional investors, are currently holding back on Exchange-Traded Fund (ETF) exposure. The decline has become more notable over the past week, particularly for Bitcoin and Ethereum. However, a few cases remain outliers, with Solana standing out. Institutional investors tend to have a significant impact on the market, and this shift could serve as an important indicator of broader market sentiment. Stablecoin inflows drop Institutional investors are gradually stepping back from the market. This movement is reflected in on-chain stablecoin volume, which has long been linked to institutional inflows and outflows. The volume has now declined. This drop is also visible in broader market performance, as Bitcoin [BTC] continues to hover around the $91,000 level, weeks after it reached an all-time high above $126,000. Source: Alphractal The decline in stablecoin inflows suggests reduced swapping activity into more volatile crypto ETFs, particularly Bitcoin and Ethereum [ETH], which lead the market with net values of $117.34 billion and $12.84 billion, respectively. In addition, institutional investors have downsized their exposure further, closing positions across both Bitcoin and Ethereum spot ETFs worth $682.64 million in the past day alone. On the 18th of November, total outflows reached $508.58 million, followed by $1.17 billion at the start of the week. This confirmed that a majority of institutional participants in the market are currently leaning bearish. Shawn Young, chief analyst at MEXC, noted that macroeconomic conditions are driving the institutional sell-off, particularly as expectations for a…

Institutions pause Bitcoin, Ethereum exposure – This is Solana’s gain

2025/11/21 14:02

Key Takeaways

Why are institutions pulling back from Bitcoin and Ethereum spot ETFs?

Stablecoin inflows and ETF holdings have dropped sharply as institutions cut exposure amid weaker macro conditions.

Which asset remains an institutional favorite despite the sell-off?

Solana ETFs, which have recorded over two weeks of continuous inflows and now hold $714.8 million in net assets.


Institutional investors, otherwise known as traditional investors, are currently holding back on Exchange-Traded Fund (ETF) exposure.

The decline has become more notable over the past week, particularly for Bitcoin and Ethereum. However, a few cases remain outliers, with Solana standing out.

Institutional investors tend to have a significant impact on the market, and this shift could serve as an important indicator of broader market sentiment.

Stablecoin inflows drop

Institutional investors are gradually stepping back from the market. This movement is reflected in on-chain stablecoin volume, which has long been linked to institutional inflows and outflows. The volume has now declined.

This drop is also visible in broader market performance, as Bitcoin [BTC] continues to hover around the $91,000 level, weeks after it reached an all-time high above $126,000.

Source: Alphractal

The decline in stablecoin inflows suggests reduced swapping activity into more volatile crypto ETFs, particularly Bitcoin and Ethereum [ETH], which lead the market with net values of $117.34 billion and $12.84 billion, respectively.

In addition, institutional investors have downsized their exposure further, closing positions across both Bitcoin and Ethereum spot ETFs worth $682.64 million in the past day alone.

On the 18th of November, total outflows reached $508.58 million, followed by $1.17 billion at the start of the week. This confirmed that a majority of institutional participants in the market are currently leaning bearish.

Shawn Young, chief analyst at MEXC, noted that macroeconomic conditions are driving the institutional sell-off, particularly as expectations for a rate cut have slipped from 100% to 33%. He added,

Still active in select areas

Despite the heavy outflows from Bitcoin and Ethereum spot ETFs, institutional investors have quietly placed bids in other segments of the market, while some assets continue to attract attention.

According to SoSoValue, these investors have collectively purchased U.S. spot Solana [SOL] ETFs over the past 17 days. This sustained accumulation has pushed the cumulative net assets under management to $714.80 million.

Source: SosoValue

This trend suggests a possible capital rotation, as investors view Solana as trading at a discount relative to its perceived long-term potential.

Notably, some institutions are still selectively adding exposure to Bitcoin and Ethereum. Digital asset treasury firm BitMine, for example, added more Ethereum to its portfolio over the past day.

The firm acquired 24,827 ETH, worth approximately $72.52 million, increasing its total Ethereum holdings to 3.56 million ETH, now valued at $10.77 billion.

Broader market perspective

The broader market remains in a state of fear, which helps explain the sustained outflows recorded over recent weeks.

According to the Fear and Greed Index from CoinMarketCap, the press time reading was at 15. This level reflected a cautious environment, marked by uncertainty and ongoing capital flight.

Source: CoinMarketCap

To understand the extent of this pullback, approximately $1.13 trillion has been wiped from the total crypto market capitalization since it peaked at $4.27 trillion on the 6th of October.

If this trend continues, further outflows may occur, with capital becoming increasingly concentrated in a select number of assets.

Previous: UK cracks down on crypto fraud as SFO arrests two in £21M NFT hedge-fund scandal
Next: Bitwise launches XRP ETF despite a 25% Q4 slide – Smart bet or mistimed risk?

Source: https://ambcrypto.com/institutions-pause-bitcoin-ethereum-exposure-this-is-solanas-gain/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Understanding the Ethereum Interoperability Layer (EIL): Bridging L2 Fragmentation and Building a Seamless Cross-Chain Experience

Understanding the Ethereum Interoperability Layer (EIL): Bridging L2 Fragmentation and Building a Seamless Cross-Chain Experience

Author: Pan Zhixiong Ethereum has successfully addressed the scaling issue over the past few years by deploying multiple Layer 2 solutions, such as Arbitrum, Optimism, and Base, resulting in reduced transaction costs and increased efficiency. However, this has led to a fragmented user experience: each L2 network acts like an isolated island, with users facing cumbersome steps, different bridging protocols, and complex asset and gas management when crossing chains. To address this pain point, the Ethereum core team recently proposed the Ethereum Interop Layer (EIL). To understand EIL, we first need to review its foundation—ERC-4337. ERC-4337 is an account abstraction standard proposed by Ethereum. It requires no changes to the underlying Ethereum protocol, implementing a new type of account structure—the smart account—simply by deploying smart contracts. This type of account not only supports advanced features such as social recovery, multisignature, and batch operations, but also allows for gas payments using ERC-20 tokens via smart contracts. However, despite the many technological innovations brought by ERC-4337, its adoption in practice remains limited. Fragmented user experience, difficulties in multi-chain collaboration, high gas costs, and ecosystem compatibility issues all restrict the widespread adoption of 4337. The EIL was developed to address these issues on top of ERC-4337. EIL is an additional multi-chain interoperability protocol built upon the ERC-4337 framework . It extends the single-chain account abstraction to multi-chain account interoperability, enabling a seamless experience across multiple L2 networks. Specifically, EIL implements two important innovations: one-signature multi-chain operations (bulk authorization) and a competitive funding mechanism for cross-chain liquidity providers (XLPs). The first innovation, bulk authorization , allows users to authorize multiple operations across multiple L2 networks with a single signature. Specifically, the wallet first constructs its own UserOperation on each relevant chain, then integrates these operations into a Merkle tree. Users only need to sign the root of the tree once. When a smart account on each chain verifies a received UserOperation, it only needs to verify that it belongs to the Merkle tree and that the signature is valid to execute the operation. This approach significantly simplifies the cross-chain operation process for users. The second innovation, the auction-based funding mechanism, introduces a role called Cross-chain Liquidity Provider (XLP). XLPs are responsible for providing asset transfer and gas payment services between different chains. When a user locks assets on the source chain and submits a cross-chain request, multiple XLPs can bid on the request through on-chain auction. The XLP that wins the bid provides a cross-chain asset transfer voucher, allowing the user to directly obtain funds and gas payments on the target chain to complete the required cross-chain operation. Only after the transaction is completed will the XLP claim the user's previously locked assets on the source chain. To ensure security and fairness, XLPs must be staked on the Ethereum mainnet (L1) and subject to a strict dispute arbitration mechanism. If an XLP violates the rules, the staked assets will be forfeited, thus ensuring its integrity through economic incentives . It's worth emphasizing that EIL doesn't require any changes to the consensus protocol of the Ethereum mainnet or L2 network during its implementation . All implementations are based on smart contracts and the existing ERC-4337 account abstraction framework. This design not only reduces the difficulty of implementation but also significantly reduces the security risks the chain itself may face. Of course, this design also shifts the pressure and complexity to the wallet and off-chain infrastructure . The wallet needs to support complex multi-chain transaction construction, one-signature multi-chain verification, interaction mechanisms with CrossChainPaymaster and XLP, and needs to provide a simple and user-friendly interface. The off-chain infrastructure, on the other hand, needs to build a robust auction market, monitor XLP fund flows in real time, and manage risks. Ultimately, EIL provides users with a single-chain-like experience. In the future, when users open EIL-enabled wallets, they will no longer need to frequently switch chains, manage cross-chain assets, or endure lengthy cross-chain waits and cumbersome procedures. All complex cross-chain details will be completed automatically outside the user's view, gradually unifying the user experience across the entire Ethereum L2 ecosystem and truly realizing the vision of multi-chain integration and seamless interoperability. EIL also opens up a whole new possibility for the entire Ethereum ecosystem: it not only solves the cross-chain user experience problem, but more importantly, it truly allows multiple L2 networks to "become one" in a secure, decentralized, and trustless way.
Share
PANews2025/11/21 14:00