The post Solana and Base Network Clash Over New Bridge appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Solana co-founder Anatoly Yakovenko struck at the core of Coinbase’s Base expansion strategy this weekend, dismissing the Ethereum layer-2 network’s new bridge as an “alignment bullshit.” In a sharp rebuke of Base lead Jesse Pollak, Yakovenko argued that cross-chain bridges are rarely neutral infrastructure. He said they act as vectors for value capture, deciding where fees settle and which ecosystem benefits. Sponsored Solana Rejects Base’s ‘Alignment’ Message Yakovenko contended that Base applications must migrate their computation to Solana so that transaction fees and economic activity accrue to Solana validators. “Migrate base apps to Solana so they execute on Solana, and the transactions are linearized by Solana staked block producers. That would be good for Solana developers. Otherwise, it’s alignment bullshit,” he said. The dispute ignited after Pollak announced the integration last week, framing it as a “bidirectional” tool to unlock shared liquidity. “We built this as a two-way bridge. The whole point is to unlock movement both ways because we are hearing from Solana teams that they want access to Base, and from Base teams that they want access to Solana. We want to make that possible,” Pollak stressed. However, Yakovenko rejected this premise, warning that “alignment” is a marketing term often used to obscure capital flight. Sponsored Considering this, he demanded that Base market the bridge honestly as a competitive tactic rather than a cooperative venture. “Ethereum L2s have to do the bs alignment dance because any activity on the L2 takes away from the ethereum L1 but you can’t be honest about it. So it reeks of bullshit,” Yakovenko said. Solana Foundation executives Vibhu Norby and Akshay BD had previously criticized the bridge, saying Base bypassed Solana’s technical and marketing teams entirely. They also alleged that the exchange-backed network launched the product without a single Solana launch partner.… The post Solana and Base Network Clash Over New Bridge appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Solana co-founder Anatoly Yakovenko struck at the core of Coinbase’s Base expansion strategy this weekend, dismissing the Ethereum layer-2 network’s new bridge as an “alignment bullshit.” In a sharp rebuke of Base lead Jesse Pollak, Yakovenko argued that cross-chain bridges are rarely neutral infrastructure. He said they act as vectors for value capture, deciding where fees settle and which ecosystem benefits. Sponsored Solana Rejects Base’s ‘Alignment’ Message Yakovenko contended that Base applications must migrate their computation to Solana so that transaction fees and economic activity accrue to Solana validators. “Migrate base apps to Solana so they execute on Solana, and the transactions are linearized by Solana staked block producers. That would be good for Solana developers. Otherwise, it’s alignment bullshit,” he said. The dispute ignited after Pollak announced the integration last week, framing it as a “bidirectional” tool to unlock shared liquidity. “We built this as a two-way bridge. The whole point is to unlock movement both ways because we are hearing from Solana teams that they want access to Base, and from Base teams that they want access to Solana. We want to make that possible,” Pollak stressed. However, Yakovenko rejected this premise, warning that “alignment” is a marketing term often used to obscure capital flight. Sponsored Considering this, he demanded that Base market the bridge honestly as a competitive tactic rather than a cooperative venture. “Ethereum L2s have to do the bs alignment dance because any activity on the L2 takes away from the ethereum L1 but you can’t be honest about it. So it reeks of bullshit,” Yakovenko said. Solana Foundation executives Vibhu Norby and Akshay BD had previously criticized the bridge, saying Base bypassed Solana’s technical and marketing teams entirely. They also alleged that the exchange-backed network launched the product without a single Solana launch partner.…

Solana and Base Network Clash Over New Bridge

2025/12/07 20:57

Solana co-founder Anatoly Yakovenko struck at the core of Coinbase’s Base expansion strategy this weekend, dismissing the Ethereum layer-2 network’s new bridge as an “alignment bullshit.”

In a sharp rebuke of Base lead Jesse Pollak, Yakovenko argued that cross-chain bridges are rarely neutral infrastructure. He said they act as vectors for value capture, deciding where fees settle and which ecosystem benefits.

Sponsored

Solana Rejects Base’s ‘Alignment’ Message

Yakovenko contended that Base applications must migrate their computation to Solana so that transaction fees and economic activity accrue to Solana validators.

The dispute ignited after Pollak announced the integration last week, framing it as a “bidirectional” tool to unlock shared liquidity.

However, Yakovenko rejected this premise, warning that “alignment” is a marketing term often used to obscure capital flight.

Sponsored

Considering this, he demanded that Base market the bridge honestly as a competitive tactic rather than a cooperative venture.

Solana Foundation executives Vibhu Norby and Akshay BD had previously criticized the bridge, saying Base bypassed Solana’s technical and marketing teams entirely.

They also alleged that the exchange-backed network launched the product without a single Solana launch partner.

At the same time, they cited private communications where Base leadership allegedly discussed “flipping” Solana as proof of hostile intent.

Sponsored

However, Pollak defended the initiative, claiming his team spent nine months building the connection to satisfy developer demand on both sides.

He attributed the friction to a communication breakdown and insisted that the bridge allows assets to flow freely wherever opportunities exist.

Sponsored

However, market observers see a darker pattern.

NFT historian Leonidas noted that Base employed similar “alignment propaganda” on Ethereum in 2023, extracting developer mindshare before pivoting to its own native economy.

Solana and Base have become two of the fastest-growing blockchain networks, competing directly for assets, liquidity, and developer activity.

Together, they hold nearly $20 billion in locked value. Solana accounts for about $12 billion, while Base holds roughly $6 billion, according to DeFiLlama data.

Source: https://beincrypto.com/solana-and-base-clash-over-new-bridge/

Market Opportunity
Clash Logo
Clash Price(CLASH)
$0.0218
$0.0218$0.0218
-1.80%
USD
Clash (CLASH) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
SOLANA NETWORK Withstands 6 Tbps DDoS Without Downtime

SOLANA NETWORK Withstands 6 Tbps DDoS Without Downtime

The post SOLANA NETWORK Withstands 6 Tbps DDoS Without Downtime appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In a pivotal week for crypto infrastructure, the Solana network
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/16 20:44
Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

The post Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Jordan Love and the Green Bay Packers are off to a 2-0 start. Getty Images The Green Bay Packers are, once again, one of the NFL’s better teams. The Cleveland Browns are, once again, one of the league’s doormats. It’s why unbeaten Green Bay (2-0) is a 8-point favorite at winless Cleveland (0-2) Sunday according to betmgm.com. The money line is also Green Bay -500. Most expect this to be a Packers’ rout, and it very well could be. But Green Bay knows taking anyone in this league for granted can prove costly. “I think if you look at their roster, the paper, who they have on that team, what they can do, they got a lot of talent and things can turn around quickly for them,” Packers safety Xavier McKinney said. “We just got to kind of keep that in mind and know we not just walking into something and they just going to lay down. That’s not what they going to do.” The Browns certainly haven’t laid down on defense. Far from. Cleveland is allowing an NFL-best 191.5 yards per game. The Browns gave up 141 yards to Cincinnati in Week 1, including just seven in the second half, but still lost, 17-16. Cleveland has given up an NFL-best 45.5 rushing yards per game and just 2.1 rushing yards per attempt. “The biggest thing is our defensive line is much, much improved over last year and I think we’ve got back to our personality,” defensive coordinator Jim Schwartz said recently. “When we play our best, our D-line leads us there as our engine.” The Browns rank third in the league in passing defense, allowing just 146.0 yards per game. Cleveland has also gone 30 straight games without allowing a 300-yard passer, the longest active streak in the NFL.…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:41