The next evolution of fintech will not be “crypto-fired.” It will be onchain but built to serve human and institutional needs, not memes or hype cycles.The next evolution of fintech will not be “crypto-fired.” It will be onchain but built to serve human and institutional needs, not memes or hype cycles.

The double-edged future: Bringing fintech onchain | Opinion

2025/12/14 21:04

Disclosure: The views and opinions expressed here belong solely to the author and do not represent the views and opinions of crypto.news’ editorial.

For years, crypto promised to democratize finance, to bank the unbanked, to make finance more inclusive. But if we’re honest, that promise has largely remained rhetorical. Blockchain technology revolutionized settlement and ownership, yet most of the world still banks, invests, and trades in the same systems it always has. The divide between the crypto economy and capital markets persists, and it is not because of a lack of interest but because of a missing bridge.

Summary
  • Crypto’s promise stalled due to a missing bridge: Finance hasn’t gone onchain at scale because capital markets and blockchain remained disconnected, not from lack of interest.
  • Adoption hinges on trust and usability: Seamless fintech UX, regulatory clarity, and hybrid onchain models are essential to expand access without increasing risk.
  • The future is onchain, not “crypto”: Finance will quietly merge into one programmable, compliant system where the TradFi–crypto divide disappears.

That bridge is beginning to take shape. We’re entering an era where fintech meets blockchain — where finance goes onchain. The question is not whether this convergence will happen, but how. And whether it will truly make capital markets more accessible or simply reproduce their inequalities under a new digital flag.

The promise: Capital markets without gatekeepers

The fundamental logic of blockchain aligns with what fintech has been chasing for decades: efficiency, transparency, and accessibility. Moving capital markets onchain could, in theory, deliver all three at once.

Tokenization of real-world assets allows anything from bonds to real estate to be fractionalized and traded with the same ease as digital tokens. Settlement could become instantaneous. Custody could be simplified. Compliance, if built correctly, could become programmable.

For retail users, this could mean genuine participation in markets previously closed to them: access to credit, yield, and diversified assets without intermediaries taking most of the margin. For institutions, it could mean cost reduction, global liquidity, and composable financial products that settle in seconds instead of days.

That’s the dream: an open, transparent, programmable capital market that runs on blockchain rails but speaks the language of finance.

Retail adoption: Access without chaos

But accessibility isn’t just about technology — it’s about experience. For most retail users, finance is already digitized through fintech apps like Revolut, Robinhood, or Cash App. The next leap is not making these platforms “more digital,” but making them natively interoperable with blockchain infrastructure, allowing users to move seamlessly between fiat and onchain assets without needing to understand gas fees, seed phrases, or chain IDs.

This is where fintech has a head start. It has mastered UX as trust. Users don’t care about what database holds their money; they care about seeing their balance, clicking once, and knowing it works. Data shows that 73% of users switch banks for a better user experience, while crypto UX is in a deep crisis.

Bringing fintech onchain must preserve that psychological contract. The onboarding needs to be invisible. The regulatory clarity needs to be visible. When the average user can buy tokenized Treasury bills from their regular fintech app, see yield accrue transparently, and trust that the same investor protections apply as in traditional markets — that’s when onchain adoption will no longer be speculative. It will be habitual.

Institutional adoption: The quiet revolution

Institutional players, meanwhile, have moved from skepticism to cautious experimentation. BlackRock’s tokenized funds, JPMorgan’s Onyx network, and Franklin Templeton’s blockchain funds are early signs of a broader shift: the world’s biggest financial engines quietly testing how much of their operations can be brought onchain without regulatory blowback or operational risk.

For them, the appeal isn’t ideology. It’s efficiency. Blockchain infrastructure can reduce reconciliation costs, improve settlement speed, and unlock new liquidity models. But institutions don’t move for ideals; they move for compliance and yield.

To bring fintech fully onchain, institutions need assurance that the benefits of TradFi — clear legal frameworks, robust custody, and recourse mechanisms — don’t vanish in translation. That’s the real double-edged sword of accessibility.

The same tools that make finance more open can make it more fragile if deployed without guardrails.

The double-edged sword: Regulation and technology

Making capital markets more accessible requires walking a tightrope between two imperatives: regulation and technology.

On one side lies regulation: the slow, necessary machinery that guarantees trust. Without it, no institution will transition onchain, and no retail user will risk their savings there. Tokenized assets need legal status. Smart contracts need enforceability. Stablecoins need backing clarity.

On the other side lies technology: the innovation that makes the transition worthwhile. If onchain infrastructure simply replicates TradFi bureaucracy with more jargon, the promise of accessibility dies in compliance paperwork.

The goal is balance: regulation that protects without suffocating, and technology that liberates without destabilizing.

This is why hybrid architectures — combining onchain transparency with off-chain controls — are gaining traction. The future isn’t decentralized anarchy; it’s programmable regulation. Compliance baked into code. Identity systems that preserve privacy while satisfying KYC. Liquidity that can flow freely but within defined perimeters.

The real barrier isn’t code — it’s culture

The hardest transition won’t be technical. It will be cultural. Finance has always run on trust, and trust is built on habit. For regulators, blockchain still feels foreign, risky, and uncontrollable. For crypto-native builders, regulation still feels like a threat to innovation. Both sides are wrong.

True accessibility will come not when we abolish TradFi, but when we integrate it, when fintech, blockchain, and regulation stop competing narratives and start forming a shared one. 

It will take new kinds of partnerships: between banks and protocols, auditors and oracles, regulators and developers. It will take language that both retail users and policymakers can understand. And it will take humility from all sides, because no one has the full map of this transition yet.

The future is onchain, but not ‘crypto’

The next evolution of fintech will not be “crypto-fied.” It will be onchain — transparent, interoperable, and composable — but built to serve human and institutional needs, not memes or hype cycles.

This future won’t look like DeFi summer. It will look like your bank, your broker, and your wallet quietly merging into one seamless interface where value moves frictionlessly across asset classes and jurisdictions.

When that happens, the distinction between fintech and crypto will dissolve. We’ll simply call it finance again — rebuilt, restructured, and running onchain.

In the end, bringing fintech onchain isn’t just a technical upgrade. It’s a philosophical one. It’s about expanding access without losing trust, innovating without abandoning regulation, and modernizing capital markets without erasing the human need for security.

That balance — between openness and order — will decide whether this next era of finance fulfills its promise or repeats the same exclusions on a shinier blockchain.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Tether's value surges over 40-fold, with a $500 billion valuation hinting at both capital and narrative ambitions.

Tether's value surges over 40-fold, with a $500 billion valuation hinting at both capital and narrative ambitions.

By Nancy, PANews News that Tether is in talks to raise funds at a $500 billion valuation has propelled it to new heights. If the deal goes through, its valuation would leap to the highest of any global crypto company, rivaling even Silicon Valley unicorns like OpenAI and SpaceX. Tether, with its strong capital base, boasts profit levels that have driven its price-to-earnings ratio beyond the reach of both crypto and traditional institutions. Yet, its pursuit of a new round of capital injection at a high valuation serves not only as a powerful testament to its profitability but also as a means of shaping the market narrative through capital operations, building momentum for future business and market expansion. Net worth soared more than 40 times in a year, and well-known core investors are being evaluated. On September 24, Bloomberg reported that stablecoin giant Tether is planning to sell approximately 3% of its shares at a valuation of $15 billion to $20 billion. If the deal goes through, Tether's valuation could reach approximately $500 billion, making it one of the world's most valuable private companies and potentially setting a record for the largest single financing in the history of the crypto industry. By comparison, in November 2024, Cantor Fitzgerald, a prominent US financial services firm, acquired approximately 5% of Tether for $600 million, valuing the company at approximately $12 billion. This means Tether's value has increased more than 40-fold in less than a year. However, since Cantor Fitzgerald's former CEO, Howard Lutnick, is currently the US Secretary of Commerce, the deal was interpreted as a "friendship price" that could potentially garner more political support for Tether. Tether's rapid rise in value is largely due to its dominant market share, impressive profit margins, and solid financial position. According to Coingecko data, as of September 24th, USDT's market capitalization exceeded $172 billion, setting a new record and accounting for over 60% of the market share. Furthermore, Tether CEO Paolo Ardoino recently admitted that Tether's profit margin is as high as 99%. The second-quarter financial report further demonstrates Tether's robust financial position, with $162.5 billion in reserve assets exceeding $157.1 billion in liabilities. "Tether has about $5.5 billion in cash, Bitcoin and equity assets on its balance sheet. If calculated based on the approximately $173 billion USDT in circulation and a 4% compound yield, and if it raises funds at a valuation of $500 billion, it means that its enterprise value to annualized return (PE) multiple is about 68 times," Dragonfly investor Omar pointed out. Sources familiar with the matter revealed that the disclosed valuation represents the upper end of the target range, and the final transaction value could be significantly lower. Negotiations are at an early stage, and investment details are subject to change. The transaction involves the issuance of new shares, not the sale of shares by existing investors. Paolo Ardoino later confirmed that the company is actively evaluating the possibility of raising capital from a number of prominent core investors. Behind the high valuation of external financing, the focus is on business expansion and compliance layout Tether has always been known to be "rich." The stablecoin giant is expected to generate $13.7 billion in net profit in 2024, thanks to interest income from U.S. Treasury bonds and cash assets. For any technology or financial company, this profit level is more than enough to support continued expansion. However, Tether is now launching a highly valued external financing plan. This is not only a capital operation strategy, but also relates to business expansion and regulatory compliance. According to Paolo Ardoino, Tether plans to raise funds to expand the company's strategic scale in existing and new business lines (stablecoins, distribution coverage, artificial intelligence, commodity trading, energy, communications, and media) by several orders of magnitude. He disclosed in July this year that Tether has invested in over 120 companies to date, and this number is expected to grow significantly in the coming months and years, with a focus on key areas such as payment infrastructure, renewable energy, Bitcoin, agriculture, artificial intelligence, and tokenization. In other words, Tether is trying to transform passive income that depends on the interest rate environment into active growth in cross-industry investments. But pressure is mounting. With the increasing number of competitors and the Federal Reserve resuming its interest rate cut cycle, Tether's main source of profit faces downward risks. The company has previously emphasized that its external investments are entirely sourced from its own profits. A decline in earnings expectations would mean a shrinking pool of funds available for expansion. However, the injection of substantial financing would provide Tether with ample liquidity for its investment portfolio. What truly necessitates Tether's capital and resources is expansion into the US market. With the implementation of the US GENIUS Act, stablecoin issuance enters a new compliance framework. This presents both a challenge and an opportunity for Tether. This is especially true after competitor Circle's successful IPO and capital market recognition, with its valuation soaring to $30 billion, further magnifying Tether's compliance shortcomings. On the one hand, USDT has long been on the gray edge, walking on the edge of regulation. Tether has successfully attracted public attention through extremely small equity transactions and huge valuations, and has also used this to enhance the market narrative, thereby breaking the negative perception of the outside world and significantly enhancing its own influence. On the other hand, unlike Circle's IPO, Tether has chosen a different path to gain mainstream market acceptance. In September of this year, Tether announced that it would launch a US-native stablecoin, USAT, by the end of the year. Unlike the widely circulated USDT, USAT is designed specifically for businesses and institutions operating under US regulations. It is issued by Anchorage Digital, a licensed digital asset bank, and operates on Tether's global distribution network. This allows Tether to retain control over its core profits while meeting regulatory compliance requirements. The personnel arrangements also make this new card intriguing. USAT's CEO is Bo Hines (see also: 29-Year-Old Crypto Upstart Bo Hines: From White House Crypto Liaison to Rapid Assignment to Tether's US Stablecoin ). In August of this year, Tether appointed him as its Digital Asset and US Strategy Advisor, responsible for developing and executing Tether's US market development strategy and strengthening communication with policymakers. As previously reported by PANews, Hines previously served as the White House Digital Asset Policy Advisor, where he was responsible for promoting crypto policy and facilitating the passage of the GENIUS Act, a US stablecoin, and has accumulated extensive connections in the political and business circles. This provides USAT with an additional layer of protection when entering the US market. Cantor Fitzgerald, the advisor to this financing round, is also noteworthy. As one of the Federal Reserve's designated principal dealers, Cantor boasts extensive experience in investment banking and private equity, building close ties to Wall Street's political and business networks. Furthermore, Cantor is the primary custodian of Tether's reserve assets, providing firsthand insight into the latter's fund operations. For external investors, Cantor's involvement not only adds credibility to Tether's financing valuation but also provides added certainty for the launch of USAT in the US market.
Share
PANews2025/09/24 15:52