Terraform Labs has re-entered the legal spotlight after its court-appointed liquidator filed a $4 billion lawsuit in the United States. The case is against tradingTerraform Labs has re-entered the legal spotlight after its court-appointed liquidator filed a $4 billion lawsuit in the United States. The case is against trading

Terraform Labs Sues Jump Trading for $4B Over Terra Collapse Role

  • Terraform Labs liquidator sues Jump Trading for $4B over alleged TerraUSD manipulation
    Lawsuit claims secret UST support earned Jump $1.28B through discounted LUNA deals
    Case may redefine legal limits for crypto market makers and liquidity providers

Terraform Labs has re-entered the legal spotlight after its court-appointed liquidator filed a $4 billion lawsuit in the United States. The case is against trading company Jump Trading and two ex-executives. The lawsuit accuses Jump Trading and the two ex-executives of manipulating markets, which was concealed behind the TerraUSD stablecoin. The filing reinstates measures that purportedly enabled the hiding of risks prior to the $40 billion fallout of the Terraform Labs ecosystem in 2022.

Todd Snyder, a liquidator, filed the case in a federal district court in Illinois. It charges Jump Trading as the defendant, along with its co-founder, William DiSomma, and former Jump Crypto president, Kanav Kariya. Snyder alleges that the company was involved in secretive fake business at the expense of investors. He claims that the actions disrupted the apparent stability of TerraUSD.

The focus of the case is the TerraUSD, or UST. The complaint states that UST initially lost its peg to the dollar in May 2021. The filing accuses Jump of secretly intervening in the course of this incident. It asserts that the company bought high quantities of UST to convert the value to a single dollar. Terraform Labs supposedly packaged the recovery as a natural consequence of its algorithm.

Terraform Labs Deal Gave Jump Deeply Discounted LUNA Tokens

According to the liquidator, this action created a misleading market signal. Investors thought that the algorithm achieved success. The suit asserts that Jump’s participation never reached the market. Snyder states that such non-disclosure enabled more serious failures in the system.

Terraform Labs in turn changed a previous contract with Jump, the complaint claims, in exchange for the intervention. The new terms were supposed to enable Jump to purchase LUNA tokens at high discounts. The filing states that Jump purchased LUNA at a price as low as $0.40. LUNA was trading at the time above $90 in the open market.

Also Read: Coinbase Files Lawsuits Against US States Over Prediction Markets Regulation

The suit claims Jump subsequently resold such discounted tokens at massive profits. According to Snyder, the sales yielded the firm an estimated revenue of close to $1.28 billion. He states that these gains were directly related to actions that concealed instability. The lawsuit cites that investors made higher losses when the ecosystem subsequently failed.

SEC Settlement Adds Weight to Terraform Labs Lawsuit

The case is based on previous regulatory findings in the United States. The Securities and Exchange Commission charged the Tai Mo Shan subsidiary of Jump in December 2024. The SEC alleged that the firm lied to investors regarding the stability of TerraUSD. 

The same case concerned the May 2021 de-pegging incident. According to regulators, Jump was motivated to do so by discounted LUNA purchases. Tai Mo Shan paid $123 million but did not confess or deny the fault.

The Terra ecosystem has been reorganized. The initial token is currently trading as Terra Classic. Terra (LUNA), a more recent version, has recently traded close to $0.1085. At the last check, the token had fallen by 6.84% in the last 24 hours.

Terraform Labs co-founder Do Kwon was recently sentenced to 15 years in federal prison in the U.S. The sentence is connected with his involvement in the Terra and LUNA collapse. He can proceed with another trial in South Korea. In case of extradition and conviction, he might get a sentence of up to 30 years of imprisonment.

Also Read: Do Kwon Requests Reduced Prison Sentence Ahead of TerraUSD Final Case Ruling

Market Opportunity
Jump Tom Logo
Jump Tom Price(JUMP)
$0.000000000000000000000001
$0.000000000000000000000001$0.000000000000000000000001
0.00%
USD
Jump Tom (JUMP) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Whales keep selling XRP despite ETF success — Data signals deeper weakness

Whales keep selling XRP despite ETF success — Data signals deeper weakness

The post Whales keep selling XRP despite ETF success — Data signals deeper weakness appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. XRP ETFs have crossed $1 billion in assets
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/20 02:55
Foreigner’s Lou Gramm Revisits The Band’s Classic ‘4’ Album, Now Reissued

Foreigner’s Lou Gramm Revisits The Band’s Classic ‘4’ Album, Now Reissued

The post Foreigner’s Lou Gramm Revisits The Band’s Classic ‘4’ Album, Now Reissued appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. American-based rock band Foreigner performs onstage at the Rosemont Horizon, Rosemont, Illinois, November 8, 1981. Pictured are, from left, Mick Jones, on guitar, and vocalist Lou Gramm. (Photo by Paul Natkin/Getty Images) Getty Images Singer Lou Gramm has a vivid memory of recording the ballad “Waiting for a Girl Like You” at New York City’s Electric Lady Studio for his band Foreigner more than 40 years ago. Gramm was adding his vocals for the track in the control room on the other side of the glass when he noticed a beautiful woman walking through the door. “She sits on the sofa in front of the board,” he says. “She looked at me while I was singing. And every now and then, she had a little smile on her face. I’m not sure what that was, but it was driving me crazy. “And at the end of the song, when I’m singing the ad-libs and stuff like that, she gets up,” he continues. “She gives me a little smile and walks out of the room. And when the song ended, I would look up every now and then to see where Mick [Jones] and Mutt [Lange] were, and they were pushing buttons and turning knobs. They were not aware that she was even in the room. So when the song ended, I said, ‘Guys, who was that woman who walked in? She was beautiful.’ And they looked at each other, and they went, ‘What are you talking about? We didn’t see anything.’ But you know what? I think they put her up to it. Doesn’t that sound more like them?” “Waiting for a Girl Like You” became a massive hit in 1981 for Foreigner off their album 4, which peaked at number one on the Billboard chart for 10 weeks and…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:26
New York Regulators Push Banks to Adopt Blockchain Analytics

New York Regulators Push Banks to Adopt Blockchain Analytics

New York’s top financial regulator urged banks to adopt blockchain analytics, signaling tighter oversight of crypto-linked risks. The move reflects regulators’ concern that traditional institutions face rising exposure to digital assets. While crypto-native firms already rely on monitoring tools, the Department of Financial Services now expects banks to use them to detect illicit activity. NYDFS Outlines Compliance Expectations The notice, issued on Wednesday by Superintendent Adrienne Harris, applies to all state-chartered banks and foreign branches. In its industry letter, the New York State Department of Financial Services (NYDFS) emphasized that blockchain analytics should be integrated into compliance programs according to each bank’s size, operations, and risk appetite. The regulator cautioned that crypto markets evolve quickly, requiring institutions to update frameworks regularly. “Emerging technologies introduce evolving threats that require enhanced monitoring tools,” the notice stated. It stressed the need for banks to prevent money laundering, sanctions violations, and other illicit finance linked to virtual currency transactions. To that end, the Department listed specific areas where blockchain analytics can be applied: Screening customer wallets with crypto exposure to assess risks. Verifying the origin of funds from virtual asset service providers (VASPs). Monitoring the ecosystem holistically to detect money laundering or sanctions exposure. Identifying and assessing counterparties, such as third-party VASPs. Evaluating expected versus actual transaction activity, including dollar thresholds. Weighing risks tied to new digital asset products before rollout. These examples highlight how institutions can tailor monitoring tools to strengthen their risk management frameworks. The guidance expands on NYDFS’s Virtual Currency-Related Activities (VCRA) framework, which has governed crypto oversight in the state since 2022. Regulators Signal Broader Impact Market observers say the notice is less about new rules and more about clarifying expectations. By formalizing the role of blockchain analytics in traditional finance, New York is reinforcing the idea that banks cannot treat crypto exposure as a niche concern. Analysts also believe the approach could ripple beyond New York. Federal agencies and regulators in other states may view the guidance as a blueprint for aligning banking oversight with the realities of digital asset adoption. For institutions, failure to adopt blockchain intelligence tools may invite regulatory scrutiny and undermine their ability to safeguard customer trust. With crypto now firmly embedded in global finance, New York’s stance suggests that blockchain analytics are no longer optional for banks — they are essential to protecting the financial system’s integrity.
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 08:49