BlackRock Bitcoin ETF provided one of the strongest ETF performances of the year 2025, despite falling Bitcoin prices. The iShares Bitcoin Trust, IBIT, accumulatedBlackRock Bitcoin ETF provided one of the strongest ETF performances of the year 2025, despite falling Bitcoin prices. The iShares Bitcoin Trust, IBIT, accumulated

Bitcoin ETF by BlackRock Draws Billions in 2025 Despite Price Decline

  • BlackRock’s Bitcoin ETF drew $25B in inflows despite negative Bitcoin returns.
  • IBIT ranked sixth in global ETF inflows while being the only top fund with losses.
  • On-chain data shows new large investors accumulating Bitcoin during price declines.

BlackRock Bitcoin ETF provided one of the strongest ETF performances of the year 2025, despite falling Bitcoin prices. The iShares Bitcoin Trust, IBIT, accumulated over $25 billion in net inflows last year. Bitcoin closed the period sharply down. The lack of price and investor demand correlation is a clear indication of a change in the utilization of bitcoin exposure.

According to Bloomberg ETF analyst Eric Balchunas, IBIT was ranked sixth on the global ETF inflow leaderboard. It was the sole ETF in the best-ranked funds to record negative annual returns. Other popular ETFs had the advantage of increasing equities or commodity gains. IBIT raised capital irrespective of the unfavorable market conditions.

According to Balchunas, investors tend to overreact to short-term price fluctuations. He stated that capital flows are much more indicative of conviction. According to him, consistent inflows demonstrate faith in the long-term functionality of BTC. Such reasoning now seems to be influencing the demand in ETFs.

Bitcoin ETFs Draw More Capital Than Gold in 2025

Strategy, headed by Michael Saylor, purchased additional BTC in the most recent pullback in the market. The company did not stop buying when the prices fell. The purchases are accumulative but not speculative.

Bitcoin ETFs also had an edge over gold-backed funds in terms of new capital inflows. The price of gold increased by over 60% in the year. Nonetheless, large gold ETFs, including SPDR Gold Shares, attracted fewer funds compared to Bitcoin ETFs. The comparison indicates that BTC is no longer viewed as a short-term trade by investors.

Certain conservative companies are reserved. Previously, Vanguard has characterized BTC as a toy. However, it continues to trade BTC ETFs on its platform. That ruling underscores increasing demand by investors to have regulated access.

Also Read: HYPE Faces Collapse or Surge: Key $20 Level Under Pressure

This trend has revolved around the influence of BlackRock. Its brand and distribution presence ease tension amongst conventional investors. These influences make it easier for investors to gain cryptocurrency exposure through established mechanisms. Consequently, it appears that ETF inflows are less vulnerable to day-to-day price variation.

Realized Capital Shifts Toward New BTC Investors

On-chain analytics indicate underlying transformations within the BTC market. CryptoQuant data shows that newly introduced large holders now own almost 50% of the realized capitalization of BTC. These consumers came in at higher prices. They are currently defining the cost base of BTC.

Realized capitalization monitors the inflow of capital into the network as a whole and not the long-term holdings. As prices fell recently, the proportion of large new investors kept increasing. This trend is a sign of accumulating weakness.

The data points out that BTC is in a re-anchoring stage. Shareholders seem to be interested in long-term prospects. The short-term rallies are not as important as long-term exposure. As Balchunas wrote, when Bitcoin ETFs can attract billions in a bad year, better markets can show an even bigger demand.

Also Read: Spot Bitcoin ETFs post $457M inflows amid early positioning push

Market Opportunity
Intuition Logo
Intuition Price(TRUST)
$0.1066
$0.1066$0.1066
-3.61%
USD
Intuition (TRUST) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.