TLDR Ethereum experienced a rare slashing event on September 10, penalizing 39 validators. The penalties were caused by operator errors linked to the SSV Network. Validators lost around 0.3 ETH each, equivalent to approximately $1,300. Third-party staking providers and infrastructure issues triggered the slashing. Ethereum’s slashing mechanism ensures network integrity by penalizing negligent behavior. Ethereum [...] The post 39 Ethereum Validators Slashed in Rare Mass Penalty Due to Errors appeared first on CoinCentral.TLDR Ethereum experienced a rare slashing event on September 10, penalizing 39 validators. The penalties were caused by operator errors linked to the SSV Network. Validators lost around 0.3 ETH each, equivalent to approximately $1,300. Third-party staking providers and infrastructure issues triggered the slashing. Ethereum’s slashing mechanism ensures network integrity by penalizing negligent behavior. Ethereum [...] The post 39 Ethereum Validators Slashed in Rare Mass Penalty Due to Errors appeared first on CoinCentral.

39 Ethereum Validators Slashed in Rare Mass Penalty Due to Errors

2025/09/12 01:23

TLDR

  • Ethereum experienced a rare slashing event on September 10, penalizing 39 validators.
  • The penalties were caused by operator errors linked to the SSV Network.
  • Validators lost around 0.3 ETH each, equivalent to approximately $1,300.
  • Third-party staking providers and infrastructure issues triggered the slashing.
  • Ethereum’s slashing mechanism ensures network integrity by penalizing negligent behavior.

Ethereum experienced a significant slashing event on September 10, with 39 validators penalized for operator errors. This incident marked one of the largest slashing events since Ethereum’s transition to proof-of-stake in 2022. Blockchain explorer Beaconcha.in confirmed that the penalties were tied to mistakes related to the SSV Network. Validators lost about 0.3 ETH each, roughly $1,300, due to the operational issues.

Ethereum Validators Penalized Due to Operator Errors

The penalties were a result of errors from third-party staking providers using distributed validator technology. Ankr triggered penalties during scheduled maintenance, and a migration issue from Allnodes led to further slashing. Both events caused duplicate validator setups, compounding the losses. Ethereum validators involved in the incident lost around 0.3 ETH each.

“These slashing events highlight the risks of poorly managed infrastructure in Ethereum staking,” said a blockchain expert. Despite the use of advanced technologies like SSV’s DVT, human error can still lead to substantial losses. The slashing penalties were not the result of malicious actions or Ethereum protocol errors, but human mistakes.

Why It Matters for Ethereum’s Staking Ecosystem

Slashing is uncommon in Ethereum, with fewer than 500 out of 1.2 million validators affected since the Beacon Chain’s launch. However, this mass slashing event is notable for its scale. Ethereum’s slashing mechanism ensures the network’s integrity by penalizing negligent behavior.

The event occurred amid growing pressure on Ethereum’s staking ecosystem. August saw more than 699,000 ETH added to the exit queue, causing delays of up to 12 days. Currently, over 2.5 million ETH are waiting to be unstaked, marking an 18-month high. With Ethereum’s price in decline, these delays have become more significant.

Despite these challenges, institutional interest in Ethereum remains strong. Ethereum has added over 50,000 new validators since May 2025. The recent U.S. regulatory clarity has boosted interest in Ethereum’s staking network.

The post 39 Ethereum Validators Slashed in Rare Mass Penalty Due to Errors appeared first on CoinCentral.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights

You May Also Like

PEPE ($PEPE) Leads Top MEME Projects by Social Activity

PEPE ($PEPE) Leads Top MEME Projects by Social Activity

The post PEPE ($PEPE) Leads Top MEME Projects by Social Activity appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. LunarCrush, a known platform for real-time metrics for crypto and Web3 projects, has released the list of rankings of the Top 10 meme projects based on their social activity over the last 24 hours. PEPE ($PEPE) leads to other top memecoins based on social activity. Fundamentally, social activity consists of engaging with posts and interactions with posts. TOP #MEME PROJECTS BY SOCIAL ACTIVITY$PEPE $DOGE $TRUMP $PUMP $APE $SHIB $PENGU #FARTCOIN $GIGA $BONK pic.twitter.com/wgJ4S30fxi — PHOENIX – Crypto News & Analytics (@pnxgrp) October 5, 2025 PEPE ($PEPE) is leading with 35.6K Engaged Posts and 5.8M Interaction-based posts, according to the last 24-hour record on LunarCrush. It can be seen that $PEPE is leading with a minor difference of 0.1K in Engaged Posts to its contemporary project Dogecoin ($DOGE) with 35.5K and 4.3M by Engaged posts and Interactions, respectively.  Phoenix has released this news through its official X account. $TRUMP, $PUMP, and $APE Battle for Attention OFFICIAL TRUMP ($TRUMP) and PUMP. fun ($PUMP) are closely fighting each other with 26.9K and 20.2K Engaged posts and 4.3M and 6.6M with Interactions. This closeness shows a strong competition between these two AI projects based on social activity on different platforms. Furthermore, ApeCoin ($APE) shows 15.0K Engaged posts with 977.5K Interactions, while Shiba Inu ($SHIB) is surviving with 12.1K Engaged posts and 1.3M Interactions. In addition, Pudgy Penguins ($PENGU) is also struggling with 8.1K and 1.8M, as well as engaged posts and interactions through social activity. FARTCOIN Slightly Outpaces GIGA in Engagement Race FARTCOIN ($FARTCOIN) shows 7.0K Engaged posts with 22.9M in Interactions. In the same way, Gigachad ($GIGA) also shows 6.6K Engaged posts and 7.5M Interactions. This negligible difference shows that they are very close to each other, with only a 0.4K difference in Engaged posts. According to the ranking by Top MEME Projects,…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/10/06 07:00
Share
How Solana Intends to Become an Even Stronger Competitor in the Blockchain Space

How Solana Intends to Become an Even Stronger Competitor in the Blockchain Space

The post How Solana Intends to Become an Even Stronger Competitor in the Blockchain Space appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Solana is preparing for a major overhaul that could make its famously fast blockchain even faster — and a lot easier to run. In its “Crypto Monthly Recap for September 2025” research report published Oct. 3, global asset manager VanEck says Solana’s upcoming Alpenglow upgrade marks the biggest change to the network’s core software since launch. The firm calls it “the largest upgrade to Solana’s consensus in its history,” pointing to six key changes that together promise faster performance, lower costs, and greater reliability. For readers less familiar with Solana’s design, Alpenglow essentially changes how the network’s thousands of validators agree on which transactions are valid. That process, known as consensus, is being streamlined so data moves through the system more efficiently and validators can operate with less friction. What VanEck highlighted Faster finality. Today, Solana takes around 12 seconds to finalize a transaction, meaning to confirm it permanently. Alpenglow cuts that to about 150 milliseconds — roughly the time it takes to blink. Faster finality makes trades, payments and app interactions feel instantaneous, bringing Solana closer to web-level responsiveness. Off-chain voting. Validators currently vote on every new block by submitting thousands of small transactions on-chain. That keeps the network secure but clogs bandwidth. Alpenglow moves voting off-chain, letting validators exchange votes privately and later post a single proof. This clears space for regular user transactions and helps keep network fees low. Simpler validator costs. Instead of paying transaction fees for every vote, validators will submit a single Validator Admission Ticket each cycle. This reduces costs and makes it easier for smaller operators to run validators, which strengthens decentralization and network security. Streamlined communication. Solana’s nodes constantly share messages to stay in sync, a process known as “gossip.” Alpenglow reduces this background traffic so validators spend less time and bandwidth…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/10/06 07:39
Share