The post ENA Technical Analysis Jan 23 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Volume story – what participation tells us about conviction Volume Profile and MarketThe post ENA Technical Analysis Jan 23 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Volume story – what participation tells us about conviction Volume Profile and Market

ENA Technical Analysis Jan 23

5 min read

Volume story – what participation tells us about conviction

Volume Profile and Market Participation

ENA’s 24-hour trading volume reached 196.53 million dollars, indicating participation about 15% above the 7-day average volume. Although the price pulled back to 0.18 dollars with a slight 0.28% decline, examining the volume profile reveals a notable dynamic within the downtrend: volume increases remain limited during downward movements, while volume slightly rises in short-term recovery attempts. This suggests that market participants are not fully convinced by the selling pressure and hints at potential base formation.

According to volume profile analysis, the highest volume node (HVN) in the last 30-day visible range is concentrated in the 0.17-0.19 band, right below the current price. In lower timeframes (1H-4H), the point of control (POC) appears fixed around 0.1750. In terms of market participation, volume is weighted on retail-focused exchanges (Binance, Bybit), but movements in ENA staking and liquidity pools on DeFi platforms may signal institutional accumulation. Compared to the average daily volume of 170 million dollars, today’s 196 million shows ‘insufficient conviction’ for the downtrend – in a healthy bear market, we would expect volume explosions on declines, but the opposite is observed here.

Accumulation or Distribution?

Accumulation Signals

With low RSI (31.73) approaching oversold territory, the decrease in volume is a classic sign of accumulation: When price tested and was rejected at 0.1798 resistance, volume remained low (under 20% in the last 4 hours), suggesting sellers are starting to exhaust. In MTF volume context, 1D and 3D timeframes each have 1 support level (0.1710 score 82/100), weekly has 2 strong supports – volume shelves have formed here, hinting at institutions collecting cheaply. Over the last 3 days, volume on down candles decreased by 12%, while on up candles it increased by 8%; this divergence shows smart money is bottom fishing.

Additionally, in the context of ENA’s Ethena protocol, the increase in stablecoin supplies (approximately 150 million USDe minted) aligns with liquidity accumulation. Volume delta analysis shows positive divergence: Despite negative price momentum, cumulative volume delta is slightly positive, meaning buying pressure is secretly increasing.

Distribution Risks

On the other hand, Supertrend bearish and staying below EMA20 (0.21) keeps distribution risk alive. If 0.1710 support breaks, a volume spike could come under pressure from 3 resistances in the 1W timeframe – bearish target 0.0719 (score 22). MACD with negative histogram lacks volume confirmation: Even if volume isn’t high enough on declines, if BTC downtrend triggers, retail panic selling could inflate volume. Outflow of 5 million ENA from whale wallets in the last 24 hours (on-chain data) could be an early distribution signal.

Price-Volume Alignment

Although price is in a downtrend, volume price confirmation is weak: Despite the 0.28% decline, volume is only +15% above average, where 30%+ is expected for a healthy bear. This mismatch emphasizes the lack of conviction in the move – price is falling alone, without volume support. In up moves (e.g., yesterday from 0.17 to 0.185), volume increased 25%, in downs it fell 10%; bullish divergence is clear. We expect volume pickup at RSI 31, as volume confirmation is essential for oversold bounces. Rejection at 0.1798 was without volume, so fakeout probability is high – real breakout needs 220 million+ volume.

In MTF, 8 strong levels (1D:1S/1R, 3D:1S/1R, 1W:2S/3R), volume clusters are support-weighted; when price tests these levels, volume dry-up occurs, signaling shake-out of weak hands.

Big Player Activity

Institutional footprints are unclear but promising: On Binance futures, long/short ratio near 1.1, funding rate negative but low (-0.01%), so shorts could get squeezed. On-chain, 2.1 million ENA inflow to top 100 wallets (last 48 hours), smells like whale accumulation. In Volume by Price (VBP) indicator, low volume nodes (LVN) above 0.19, so cleanup needed for breakout – institutions likely defending the 0.17-0.18 band as POC. Watch for whale dumps for distribution, but for now accumulation pattern dominant: According to Wyckoff schematics, re-accumulation possible after ‘spring’ test.

Check detailed data for ENA Spot Analysis and ENA Futures Analysis.

Bitcoin Correlation

BTC at 89,418 dollars with -0.75% decline in downtrend, Supertrend bearish. Altcoins like ENA are tied to BTC with 0.85 correlation; if BTC breaks 88,438 support, ENA accelerates to 0.1710, above 90,309 resistance signals alt season. BTC dominance increase crushes alts, key levels: BTC supp 88k/86k, res 90k/92k – For ENA, BTC below 86k triggers bearish target 0.0719, above 92k opens bullish 0.2835 (even if low score).

Volume-Based Outlook

Volume narrative: Downtrend conviction weak, accumulation signals prevail – volume test at 0.1710 critical. 220M+ volume with 0.1798 breakout bullish, below 150M dry-up bearish. Outlook: Short-term cautious bullish, wait for volume confirmation. Healthy volume: Spike on up, dry-up on down – currently matches this profile.

This analysis uses Chief Analyst Devrim Cacal’s market views and methodology.

Crypto Research Analyst: Michael Roberts

Blockchain technology and DeFi focused

This analysis is not investment advice. Do your own research.

Source: https://en.coinotag.com/analysis/ena-volume-analysis-january-23-2026-accumulation-distribution

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

The post Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. “It’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress,” writes Pipes. Getty Images Washington is addicted to taxing success. Now, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is floating a plan to skim half the patent earnings from inventions developed at universities with federal funding. It’s being sold as a way to shore up programs like Social Security. In reality, it’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress. Yes, taxpayer dollars support early-stage research. But the real payoff comes later—in the jobs created, cures discovered, and industries launched when universities and private industry turn those discoveries into real products. By comparison, the sums at stake in patent licensing are trivial. Universities collectively earn only about $3.6 billion annually in patent income—less than the federal government spends on Social Security in a single day. Even confiscating half would barely register against a $6 trillion federal budget. And yet the damage from such a policy would be anything but trivial. The true return on taxpayer investment isn’t in licensing checks sent to Washington, but in the downstream economic activity that federally supported research unleashes. Thanks to the bipartisan Bayh-Dole Act of 1980, universities and private industry have powerful incentives to translate early-stage discoveries into real-world products. Before Bayh-Dole, the government hoarded patents from federally funded research, and fewer than 5% were ever licensed. Once universities could own and license their own inventions, innovation exploded. The result has been one of the best returns on investment in government history. Since 1996, university research has added nearly $2 trillion to U.S. industrial output, supported 6.5 million jobs, and launched more than 19,000 startups. Those companies pay…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 03:26
XRP Ledger Unlocks Permissioned Domains With 91% Validator Backing

XRP Ledger Unlocks Permissioned Domains With 91% Validator Backing

XRP Ledger activated XLS-80 after 91% validator approval, enabling permissioned domains for credential-gated use on the public XRPL. The XRP Ledger has activated
Share
LiveBitcoinNews2026/02/06 13:00
TrendX Taps Trusta AI to Develop Safer and Smarter Web3 Network

TrendX Taps Trusta AI to Develop Safer and Smarter Web3 Network

The purpose of collaboration is to advance the Web3 landscape by combining the decentralized infrastructure of TrendX with AI-led capabilities of Trusta AI.
Share
Blockchainreporter2025/09/18 01:07