TLDR: Bill 4.308/2024 bans unbacked stablecoins like Ethena’s USDe and Frax in Brazil.  Domestic stablecoins must maintain full reserves and report backing transparentlyTLDR: Bill 4.308/2024 bans unbacked stablecoins like Ethena’s USDe and Frax in Brazil.  Domestic stablecoins must maintain full reserves and report backing transparently

Unbacked Stablecoins Face Ban in Brazil as New Bill Moves Forward

2 min read

TLDR:

  • Bill 4.308/2024 bans unbacked stablecoins like Ethena’s USDe and Frax in Brazil. 
  • Domestic stablecoins must maintain full reserves and report backing transparently. 
  • Exchanges offering USDT and USDC must verify foreign issuers meet Brazilian standards. 
  • Stablecoins now drive 90% of Brazil’s crypto volume, reaching $6–8B monthly flows.

Brazil stablecoin ban advances as Congress approves Bill 4.308/2024, mandating full reserve backing for stablecoins.

Foreign digital currencies like USDT and USDC must comply, while unbacked models face criminal penalties.

Brazil Approves Bill to Restrict Algorithmic Stablecoins

According to a report by CoinDesk, Brazil’s Science, Technology, and Innovation Committee has approved Bill 4.308/2024. The legislation targets the issuance and circulation of unbacked stablecoins such as Ethena’s USDe and Frax.

All stablecoins issued domestically must be fully backed by segregated reserve assets. Issuers are required to maintain transparency in reporting the reserves supporting these digital currencies, ensuring full traceability.

The bill classified it as a financial offense with penalties of up to eight years for issuing unbacked stablecoins. This measure establishes accountability and protects the integrity of Brazil’s financial system.

Domestic exchanges are tasked with monitoring compliance for all local stablecoin issuers. They must ensure that backing requirements are continuously met, preventing any uncollateralized tokens from entering circulation.

These rules are aligned with global concerns over the systemic risks posed by unbacked stablecoins, such as the Terra failure in 2022. Brazil aims to mitigate potential financial instability by enforcing strict regulatory oversight.

Compliance and Oversight for Foreign Stablecoins

Foreign stablecoins, including Tether’s USDT and USDC, must comply with Brazil’s regulatory framework. Exchanges offering these assets are required to verify issuers’ reserves and follow local compliance standards.

If foreign stablecoin providers fail to meet the requirements, exchanges assume responsibility for potential risks. 

Custody, auditing, and reporting obligations are imposed on platforms offering foreign digital currencies to Brazilian users.

The Receita Federal categorizes trades, swaps, large retail payments, and wallet transfers, providing comprehensive oversight for billions in monthly flows.

In the meantime, Stablecoins represent around 90% of Brazil’s crypto volume, with monthly transactions of $6–8 billion. Analysts have projected that the total could rise to $9 billion by 2030.

Foreign firms serving Brazilian clients must establish local entities, hold the required capital, and comply with operational standards. All these are aimed at strengthening overall market oversight.

The post Unbacked Stablecoins Face Ban in Brazil as New Bill Moves Forward appeared first on Blockonomi.

Market Opportunity
Comedian Logo
Comedian Price(BAN)
$0.0653
$0.0653$0.0653
-7.55%
USD
Comedian (BAN) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

XRP Ledger Unlocks Permissioned Domains With 91% Validator Backing

XRP Ledger Unlocks Permissioned Domains With 91% Validator Backing

XRP Ledger activated XLS-80 after 91% validator approval, enabling permissioned domains for credential-gated use on the public XRPL. The XRP Ledger has activated
Share
LiveBitcoinNews2026/02/06 13:00
Music body ICMP laments “wilful” theft of artists’ work

Music body ICMP laments “wilful” theft of artists’ work

The post Music body ICMP laments “wilful” theft of artists’ work appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. A major music industry group, ICMP, has lamented the use of artists’ work by AI companies, calling them guilty of “wilful” copyright infringement, as the battle between the tech firms and the arts industry continues. The Brussels-based group known as the International Confederation of Music Publishers (ICMP) comprises major record labels and other music industry professionals. Their voice adds to many others within the arts industry that have expressed displeasure at AI firms for using their creative work to train their systems without permission. ICMP accuses AI firms of deliberate copyright infringement ICMP director general John Phelan told AFP that big tech firms and AI-specific companies were involved in what he termed “the largest copyright infringement exercise that has been seen.” He cited the likes of OpenAI, Suno, Udio, and Mistral as some of the culprits. The ICMP carried out an investigation for nearly two years to ascertain how generative AI firms were using material by creatives to enrich themselves. The Brussels-based group is one of a number of industry bodies that span across news media and publishing to target the fast-growing AI sector over its use of content without paying any royalties. Suno and Udio, who are AI music generators, can produce tracks with voices, melodies, and musical styles that echo those of the original artists such as the Beatles, Depeche Mode, Mariah Carey, and the Beach boys. “What is legal or illegal is how the technologies are used. That means the corporate decisions made by the chief executives of companies matter immensely and should comply with the law,” Phelan told AFP. “What we see is they are engaged in wilful, commercial-scale copyright infringement.” Phelan. In June last year, a US trade group, the Recording Industry Association of America, filed a lawsuit against Suno and Udio. However, an exception…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 04:41
XRPL Adds Institutional Lending and Privacy Tools in Ripple’s 2026 Roadmap

XRPL Adds Institutional Lending and Privacy Tools in Ripple’s 2026 Roadmap

Ripple shared a new Institutional DeFi roadmap showing how the XRP Ledger is being shaped for everyday use by banks, asset managers, and regulated financial firms
Share
Tronweekly2026/02/06 13:00