Bitcoin’s path to quantum safety may be smoother than expected, with proactive steps already underway.
Key takeaways
- Most crypto wallets use quantum-safe derivation schemes for seed phrases, enhancing security against quantum threats.
- A soft fork could be implemented in Bitcoin to require proof of seed phrase ownership, addressing potential quantum threats.
- Identifying relevant Bitcoin developers is challenging due to noise from less impactful contributors.
- Organizations like Chaincode Labs and Blockstream Research are crucial in advancing post-quantum security for Bitcoin.
- The Bitcoin community may adapt to post-quantum challenges faster than anticipated.
- There is a forming consensus among Bitcoin developers on approaches to address quantum threats.
- Preparing Bitcoin for a post-quantum world may be easier than expected, despite higher data requirements.
- Current post-quantum cryptographic schemes are in early stages and may not be reliable yet.
- Quantum computing poses a significant threat to all cryptographic protocols, including Bitcoin.
- The Ethereum Foundation is taking a more proactive approach to quantum threats compared to Bitcoin.
- Bitcoin may take seven years to upgrade to a post-quantum state, but proactive steps are being taken now.
- The public perception of quantum threats may pose a greater risk to Bitcoin than the actual technological threat in the short term.
Guest intro
Matt Corallo is a Bitcoin Core contributor at Chaincode Labs. He is a co-founder of Blockstream and the creator and maintainer of the Fast Internet Bitcoin Relay Engine (FIBRE).
Quantum-safe measures in crypto wallets
- “Most crypto wallets use derivation schemes that are quantum safe” – Matt Corallo
- Seed phrases in wallets enhance security against quantum threats.
- A soft fork could require proof of seed phrase ownership to combat quantum threats.
- “We could do a soft fork in Bitcoin and require proof of seed phrase” – Matt Corallo
- Understanding wallet security mechanisms is crucial for future-proofing against quantum computing.
- Quantum-safe measures are already integrated into many crypto wallets.
- The implications of quantum computing on wallet security are significant.
- Adapting to quantum threats doesn’t necessarily require extensive wallet upgrades.
Identifying relevant Bitcoin developers
- “It can be hard to tell who’s relevant in Bitcoin development” – Matt Corallo
- Noise from less impactful contributors complicates identifying key developers.
- Organizations like Chaincode Labs focus on post-quantum security.
- “Chaincode Labs has spent time on mapping out a post-quantum future for Bitcoin” – Matt Corallo
- Understanding the dynamics of the Bitcoin development community is crucial.
- The distinction between impactful and non-impactful contributors is essential.
- Engaging with the right developers is critical for stakeholders.
- The Bitcoin community is preparing for post-quantum challenges.
Consensus and roadmap for post-quantum Bitcoin
- A consensus is forming among developers on addressing quantum threats.
- “There’s a consensus forming in terms of approaches” – Matt Corallo
- Preparing Bitcoin for a post-quantum world may be easier than expected.
- Higher data requirements are a consideration in preparing for quantum threats.
- “Bitcoin core developers are conservative about data requirements” – Matt Corallo
- A roadmap to address quantum threats is gaining consensus.
- The technical feasibility of adapting Bitcoin is optimistic.
- Developers are actively working on post-quantum security measures.
Challenges and opportunities in post-quantum cryptography
- Current post-quantum cryptographic schemes are in early stages.
- “Post-quantum schemes are still fairly young” – Matt Corallo
- Hash-based signatures allow gradual transition without immediate reliance.
- “You can start using addresses that commit to post-quantum hash-based signatures” – Matt Corallo
- Integrating new cryptographic methods is a strategic approach.
- The reliability of current post-quantum schemes is under evaluation.
- A gradual transition to post-quantum cryptography is possible.
- Bitcoin’s security measures are evolving to address future threats.
Quantum computing’s impact on cryptographic protocols
- Quantum computing poses a significant threat to cryptographic protocols.
- “A quantum computer could keep plans secret, leaving holders vulnerable” – Matt Corallo
- Ethereum is more proactive in addressing quantum threats than Bitcoin.
- “The Ethereum Foundation has a group dedicated to working on this” – Matt Corallo
- The threat of quantum computing requires immediate attention.
- Differing strategies between Ethereum and Bitcoin highlight contrasting approaches.
- Quantum threats are a critical risk in the blockchain space.
- Proactive measures are essential to mitigate quantum vulnerabilities.
Transitioning to post-quantum public keys
- The transition to post-quantum public keys involves community consensus.
- “You have to flip that switch, it’s up to the community” – Matt Corallo
- Cryptocurrencies face similar challenges as other cryptographic systems.
- “There’s not much unique about any crypto in this decision” – Matt Corallo
- Community consensus is crucial for accepting old public keys.
- The decision-making process involves complex considerations.
- The broader industry issue of quantum security affects all cryptographic systems.
- Transitioning to post-quantum security is a shared challenge across industries.
Market dynamics and Bitcoin forks
- The market will prefer forks that disable insecure spend paths.
- “The market is gonna prefer the fork with insecure spend paths disabled” – Matt Corallo
- Market forces determine the value and fate of crypto.
- “It’s up to the market, not consensus among all stakeholders” – Matt Corallo
- The role of market dynamics is critical in crypto forks.
- Developers prioritize principles like censorship resistance.
- “Contributors focus on principles rather than specific constituencies” – Matt Corallo
- Bitcoin’s development is guided by foundational principles.
Trustlessness and quantum threats
- Trustlessness is a key focus for Bitcoin developers.
- “Trustlessness is the right answer for Bitcoin development” – Matt Corallo
- Quantum computing threatens Bitcoin’s trustlessness.
- “A quantum computer stealing coins impacts trust in the system” – Matt Corallo
- User confidence is tied to the system’s trustlessness.
- Developers prioritize user autonomy and security.
- Ongoing security considerations are necessary for Bitcoin.
- Quantum threats challenge the core principles of Bitcoin.
Bitcoin’s competition for capital
- Bitcoin faces competition from new investment classes like AI.
- “Bitcoin is competing for capital with AI, a new investment class” – Matt Corallo
- Short-term price movements are not a priority for developers.
- “Developers focus on principles, not short-term price” – Matt Corallo
- Market dynamics could favor forks with lower supply.
- “Forks with lower supply might win in market dynamics” – Matt Corallo
- The investment landscape shift impacts Bitcoin’s performance.
- Developer priorities differ from market price fluctuations.
Cryptographic risks and mitigation strategies
- Traditional mathematical breakthroughs could threaten cryptography.
- “There’s a risk of traditional breakthroughs leading to cryptographic issues” – Matt Corallo
- Requiring multiple signature schemes can mitigate risks.
- “Require two different signature schemes to ensure security” – Matt Corallo
- Cryptographic vulnerabilities evolve progressively over time.
- “Cryptographic primitives aren’t broken overnight” – Matt Corallo
- Proactive measures are necessary to address cryptographic risks.
- The blockchain community is considering technical solutions to complex problems.
Bitcoin’s path to quantum safety may be smoother than expected, with proactive steps already underway.
Key takeaways
- Most crypto wallets use quantum-safe derivation schemes for seed phrases, enhancing security against quantum threats.
- A soft fork could be implemented in Bitcoin to require proof of seed phrase ownership, addressing potential quantum threats.
- Identifying relevant Bitcoin developers is challenging due to noise from less impactful contributors.
- Organizations like Chaincode Labs and Blockstream Research are crucial in advancing post-quantum security for Bitcoin.
- The Bitcoin community may adapt to post-quantum challenges faster than anticipated.
- There is a forming consensus among Bitcoin developers on approaches to address quantum threats.
- Preparing Bitcoin for a post-quantum world may be easier than expected, despite higher data requirements.
- Current post-quantum cryptographic schemes are in early stages and may not be reliable yet.
- Quantum computing poses a significant threat to all cryptographic protocols, including Bitcoin.
- The Ethereum Foundation is taking a more proactive approach to quantum threats compared to Bitcoin.
- Bitcoin may take seven years to upgrade to a post-quantum state, but proactive steps are being taken now.
- The public perception of quantum threats may pose a greater risk to Bitcoin than the actual technological threat in the short term.
Guest intro
Matt Corallo is a Bitcoin Core contributor at Chaincode Labs. He is a co-founder of Blockstream and the creator and maintainer of the Fast Internet Bitcoin Relay Engine (FIBRE).
Quantum-safe measures in crypto wallets
- “Most crypto wallets use derivation schemes that are quantum safe” – Matt Corallo
- Seed phrases in wallets enhance security against quantum threats.
- A soft fork could require proof of seed phrase ownership to combat quantum threats.
- “We could do a soft fork in Bitcoin and require proof of seed phrase” – Matt Corallo
- Understanding wallet security mechanisms is crucial for future-proofing against quantum computing.
- Quantum-safe measures are already integrated into many crypto wallets.
- The implications of quantum computing on wallet security are significant.
- Adapting to quantum threats doesn’t necessarily require extensive wallet upgrades.
Identifying relevant Bitcoin developers
- “It can be hard to tell who’s relevant in Bitcoin development” – Matt Corallo
- Noise from less impactful contributors complicates identifying key developers.
- Organizations like Chaincode Labs focus on post-quantum security.
- “Chaincode Labs has spent time on mapping out a post-quantum future for Bitcoin” – Matt Corallo
- Understanding the dynamics of the Bitcoin development community is crucial.
- The distinction between impactful and non-impactful contributors is essential.
- Engaging with the right developers is critical for stakeholders.
- The Bitcoin community is preparing for post-quantum challenges.
Consensus and roadmap for post-quantum Bitcoin
- A consensus is forming among developers on addressing quantum threats.
- “There’s a consensus forming in terms of approaches” – Matt Corallo
- Preparing Bitcoin for a post-quantum world may be easier than expected.
- Higher data requirements are a consideration in preparing for quantum threats.
- “Bitcoin core developers are conservative about data requirements” – Matt Corallo
- A roadmap to address quantum threats is gaining consensus.
- The technical feasibility of adapting Bitcoin is optimistic.
- Developers are actively working on post-quantum security measures.
Challenges and opportunities in post-quantum cryptography
- Current post-quantum cryptographic schemes are in early stages.
- “Post-quantum schemes are still fairly young” – Matt Corallo
- Hash-based signatures allow gradual transition without immediate reliance.
- “You can start using addresses that commit to post-quantum hash-based signatures” – Matt Corallo
- Integrating new cryptographic methods is a strategic approach.
- The reliability of current post-quantum schemes is under evaluation.
- A gradual transition to post-quantum cryptography is possible.
- Bitcoin’s security measures are evolving to address future threats.
Quantum computing’s impact on cryptographic protocols
- Quantum computing poses a significant threat to cryptographic protocols.
- “A quantum computer could keep plans secret, leaving holders vulnerable” – Matt Corallo
- Ethereum is more proactive in addressing quantum threats than Bitcoin.
- “The Ethereum Foundation has a group dedicated to working on this” – Matt Corallo
- The threat of quantum computing requires immediate attention.
- Differing strategies between Ethereum and Bitcoin highlight contrasting approaches.
- Quantum threats are a critical risk in the blockchain space.
- Proactive measures are essential to mitigate quantum vulnerabilities.
Transitioning to post-quantum public keys
- The transition to post-quantum public keys involves community consensus.
- “You have to flip that switch, it’s up to the community” – Matt Corallo
- Cryptocurrencies face similar challenges as other cryptographic systems.
- “There’s not much unique about any crypto in this decision” – Matt Corallo
- Community consensus is crucial for accepting old public keys.
- The decision-making process involves complex considerations.
- The broader industry issue of quantum security affects all cryptographic systems.
- Transitioning to post-quantum security is a shared challenge across industries.
Market dynamics and Bitcoin forks
- The market will prefer forks that disable insecure spend paths.
- “The market is gonna prefer the fork with insecure spend paths disabled” – Matt Corallo
- Market forces determine the value and fate of crypto.
- “It’s up to the market, not consensus among all stakeholders” – Matt Corallo
- The role of market dynamics is critical in crypto forks.
- Developers prioritize principles like censorship resistance.
- “Contributors focus on principles rather than specific constituencies” – Matt Corallo
- Bitcoin’s development is guided by foundational principles.
Trustlessness and quantum threats
- Trustlessness is a key focus for Bitcoin developers.
- “Trustlessness is the right answer for Bitcoin development” – Matt Corallo
- Quantum computing threatens Bitcoin’s trustlessness.
- “A quantum computer stealing coins impacts trust in the system” – Matt Corallo
- User confidence is tied to the system’s trustlessness.
- Developers prioritize user autonomy and security.
- Ongoing security considerations are necessary for Bitcoin.
- Quantum threats challenge the core principles of Bitcoin.
Bitcoin’s competition for capital
- Bitcoin faces competition from new investment classes like AI.
- “Bitcoin is competing for capital with AI, a new investment class” – Matt Corallo
- Short-term price movements are not a priority for developers.
- “Developers focus on principles, not short-term price” – Matt Corallo
- Market dynamics could favor forks with lower supply.
- “Forks with lower supply might win in market dynamics” – Matt Corallo
- The investment landscape shift impacts Bitcoin’s performance.
- Developer priorities differ from market price fluctuations.
Cryptographic risks and mitigation strategies
- Traditional mathematical breakthroughs could threaten cryptography.
- “There’s a risk of traditional breakthroughs leading to cryptographic issues” – Matt Corallo
- Requiring multiple signature schemes can mitigate risks.
- “Require two different signature schemes to ensure security” – Matt Corallo
- Cryptographic vulnerabilities evolve progressively over time.
- “Cryptographic primitives aren’t broken overnight” – Matt Corallo
- Proactive measures are necessary to address cryptographic risks.
- The blockchain community is considering technical solutions to complex problems.
Loading more articles…
You’ve reached the end
Add us on Google
`;
}
function createMobileArticle(article) {
const displayDate = getDisplayDate(article);
const editorSlug = article.editor ? article.editor.toLowerCase().replace(/\s+/g, ‘-‘) : ”;
const captionHtml = article.imageCaption ? `
${article.imageCaption}
` : ”;
const authorHtml = article.isPressRelease ? ” : `
`;
return `
${captionHtml}
${article.subheadline ? `
${article.subheadline}
` : ”}
${createSocialShare()}
${authorHtml}
${displayDate}
${article.content}
`;
}
function createDesktopArticle(article, sidebarAdHtml) {
const editorSlug = article.editor ? article.editor.toLowerCase().replace(/\s+/g, ‘-‘) : ”;
const displayDate = getDisplayDate(article);
const captionHtml = article.imageCaption ? `
${article.imageCaption}
` : ”;
const categoriesHtml = article.categories.map((cat, i) => {
const separator = i < article.categories.length – 1 ? ‘|‘ : ”;
return `${cat}${separator}`;
}).join(”);
const desktopAuthorHtml = article.isPressRelease ? ” : `
`;
return `
${categoriesHtml}
${article.subheadline}
` : ”}
${desktopAuthorHtml}
${displayDate}
${createSocialShare()}
${captionHtml}
`;
}
function loadMoreArticles() {
if (isLoading || !hasMore) return;
isLoading = true;
loadingText.classList.remove(‘hidden’);
// Build form data for AJAX request
const formData = new FormData();
formData.append(‘action’, ‘cb_lovable_load_more’);
formData.append(‘current_post_id’, lastLoadedPostId);
formData.append(‘primary_cat_id’, primaryCatId);
formData.append(‘before_date’, lastLoadedDate);
formData.append(‘loaded_ids’, loadedPostIds.join(‘,’));
fetch(ajaxUrl, {
method: ‘POST’,
body: formData
})
.then(response => response.json())
.then(data => {
isLoading = false;
loadingText.classList.add(‘hidden’);
if (data.success && data.has_more && data.article) {
const article = data.article;
const sidebarAdHtml = data.sidebar_ad_html || ”;
// Check for duplicates
if (loadedPostIds.includes(article.id)) {
console.log(‘Duplicate article detected, skipping:’, article.id);
// Update pagination vars and try again
lastLoadedDate = article.publishDate;
loadMoreArticles();
return;
}
// Add to mobile container
mobileContainer.insertAdjacentHTML(‘beforeend’, createMobileArticle(article));
// Add to desktop container with fresh ad HTML
desktopContainer.insertAdjacentHTML(‘beforeend’, createDesktopArticle(article, sidebarAdHtml));
// Update tracking variables
loadedPostIds.push(article.id);
lastLoadedPostId = article.id;
lastLoadedDate = article.publishDate;
// Execute any inline scripts in the new content (for ads)
const newArticle = desktopContainer.querySelector(`article[data-article-id=”${article.id}”]`);
if (newArticle) {
const scripts = newArticle.querySelectorAll(‘script’);
scripts.forEach(script => {
const newScript = document.createElement(‘script’);
if (script.src) {
newScript.src = script.src;
} else {
newScript.textContent = script.textContent;
}
document.body.appendChild(newScript);
});
}
// Trigger Ad Inserter if available
if (typeof ai_check_and_insert_block === ‘function’) {
ai_check_and_insert_block();
}
// Trigger Google Publisher Tag refresh if available
if (typeof googletag !== ‘undefined’ && googletag.pubads) {
googletag.cmd.push(function() {
googletag.pubads().refresh();
});
}
} else if (data.success && !data.has_more) {
hasMore = false;
endText.classList.remove(‘hidden’);
} else if (!data.success) {
console.error(‘AJAX error:’, data.error);
hasMore = false;
endText.textContent=”Error loading more articles”;
endText.classList.remove(‘hidden’);
}
})
.catch(error => {
console.error(‘Fetch error:’, error);
isLoading = false;
loadingText.classList.add(‘hidden’);
hasMore = false;
endText.textContent=”Error loading more articles”;
endText.classList.remove(‘hidden’);
});
}
// Set up IntersectionObserver
const observer = new IntersectionObserver(function(entries) {
if (entries[0].isIntersecting) {
loadMoreArticles();
}
}, { threshold: 0.1 });
observer.observe(loadingTrigger);
})();
© Decentral Media and Crypto Briefing® 2026.
Source: https://cryptobriefing.com/matt-corallo-most-crypto-wallets-are-quantum-safe-bitcoins-soft-fork-could-require-proof-of-seed-phrase-ownership-and-the-ethereum-foundation-is-leading-in-quantum-threat-response-unchained/
