A Nobel Prize winner has suggested the war with Iran is a turning point for Donald Trump's administration for all the wrong reasons. Paul Krugman believes the presidentA Nobel Prize winner has suggested the war with Iran is a turning point for Donald Trump's administration for all the wrong reasons. Paul Krugman believes the president

Nobel Prize winner says 'bloody shambles' of Iran war raise 'one big question'

2026/03/12 21:02
3 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

A Nobel Prize winner has suggested the war with Iran is a turning point for Donald Trump's administration for all the wrong reasons.

Paul Krugman believes the president has fully played his hand in the Middle East and revealed he has intentionally picked incompetent advisors and allies who would rarely, if ever, challenge his actions in office. This, the economist believes, is why Trump has received little pushback from the elites who funded his campaign, and how Trump will continue carrying out this war.

The economist wrote, "Amid the bloody shambles, one big question is, who put The Gang That Couldn’t Think Straight in power? In an immediate sense, Trump was put over the top by low-information voters — defined by G. Elliott Morris as voters who don’t know which party controls Congress.

"But the groundwork for the MAGA takeover was laid well before by the Roberts Supreme Court and by right-wing billionaires that the court enabled.

"There is, however, something that is still puzzling me: To a large extent billionaires bought themselves a government friendly to their interests. Trump and company have granted many items on the tech broligarchy wish list, from tax breaks to deregulation to promotion of crypto and unregulated AI.

"But why the abject incompetence? Couldn’t billionaires find political allies who wouldn’t plunge the country into a potentially disastrous and historically unpopular war without considering the risks?"

Krugman believes the decisions Trump made when picking allies can be broken down into two possible factors. The economist wrote, "One is that no, competent allies weren’t available. Money buys a lot of influence, but to actually take over the U.S. government requires more than money — it requires politicians who are utterly corrupt.

"In his first administration, Trump learned that hiring people who were even modestly competent eventually presented barriers to his authoritarian instincts – for example, his former Vice President Mike Pence. Hence Trump learned that in choosing his political hires the more incompetent, the more venal, the more bigoted, and the more cruel, the better."

There is also the plausible case for Trump to have intentionally selected people whose money makes them uncaring, and that is why they have not meddled with the president's plans in Iran or domestically.

"My second answer is that the vast wealth of tech billionaires has made many of them unconcerned with the little people’s lives — and deeply unpatriotic," Krugman claimed. "If Americans are being brutalized and murdered by rogue ICE agents…well, that’s not their problem."

"If the Justice Department and the FBI are totally subverted and operate as Trump’s enforcers, they know that vindictive, unlawful tactics will never touch their lives. If Republican budget cuts decimate rural hospitals and deprive hundreds of thousands of health insurance…well, they have their own private doctors and clinics.

"If Trump starts an ill-conceived war that doubles the price of oil…well, they can certainly afford the higher gasoline bills for their limousines and yachts. And it won’t be their kids hunkered down in a bunker in the Middle East."

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Tags:

You May Also Like

Stephen Gregory named binance us ceo as exchange targets expansion in US crypto market

Stephen Gregory named binance us ceo as exchange targets expansion in US crypto market

Binance.US names Stephen Gregory as binance us ceo, signaling expansion in the US crypto market with a renewed focus on compliance.
Share
The Cryptonomist2026/03/12 20:09
The Growing World of Medical Aesthetics: Enhancing Beauty Through Science and Innovation

The Growing World of Medical Aesthetics: Enhancing Beauty Through Science and Innovation

In recent years, the field of medical aesthetics has grown rapidly as more individuals seek safe and effective ways to enhance their appearance and improve their
Share
Techbullion2026/03/12 23:21
Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

The post Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Jordan Love and the Green Bay Packers are off to a 2-0 start. Getty Images The Green Bay Packers are, once again, one of the NFL’s better teams. The Cleveland Browns are, once again, one of the league’s doormats. It’s why unbeaten Green Bay (2-0) is a 8-point favorite at winless Cleveland (0-2) Sunday according to betmgm.com. The money line is also Green Bay -500. Most expect this to be a Packers’ rout, and it very well could be. But Green Bay knows taking anyone in this league for granted can prove costly. “I think if you look at their roster, the paper, who they have on that team, what they can do, they got a lot of talent and things can turn around quickly for them,” Packers safety Xavier McKinney said. “We just got to kind of keep that in mind and know we not just walking into something and they just going to lay down. That’s not what they going to do.” The Browns certainly haven’t laid down on defense. Far from. Cleveland is allowing an NFL-best 191.5 yards per game. The Browns gave up 141 yards to Cincinnati in Week 1, including just seven in the second half, but still lost, 17-16. Cleveland has given up an NFL-best 45.5 rushing yards per game and just 2.1 rushing yards per attempt. “The biggest thing is our defensive line is much, much improved over last year and I think we’ve got back to our personality,” defensive coordinator Jim Schwartz said recently. “When we play our best, our D-line leads us there as our engine.” The Browns rank third in the league in passing defense, allowing just 146.0 yards per game. Cleveland has also gone 30 straight games without allowing a 300-yard passer, the longest active streak in the NFL.…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:41