The post Wall Street expert predicts 80% Tesla stock crash in 2026 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Tesla (NASDAQ: TSLA) FSD – the autonomous driving technologyThe post Wall Street expert predicts 80% Tesla stock crash in 2026 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Tesla (NASDAQ: TSLA) FSD – the autonomous driving technology

Wall Street expert predicts 80% Tesla stock crash in 2026

For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

Tesla (NASDAQ: TSLA) FSD – the autonomous driving technology – has been a powerful driver of the electric vehicle (EV) maker’s stock market performance, but one Wall Street expert, Gordon Johnson of GJL Research, also sees it as a major valuation risk.

Specifically, the analyst took to X on March 15 to explain that the program could ultimately lead to TSLA shares collapsing as much as 80% in the second half (H2) of 2026: from the press time price of $394.39 to $78.88.

Tesla stock price one-year chart. Source: Finbold

The crux of Johnson’s argument comes in the form of Elon Musk having a track record of either intentionally or accidentally overpromising and underdelivering essentially every year in the last decade, while also setting H1 of 2026 as a hard deadline for FSD.

Indeed, the Wall Street expert believes that Tesla stock investors and other backers have an unrealistic expectation for what the company’s self-driving will actually look like and how extensively it will be proliferated in the coming months.

Johnson points to the history of Musk’s broken promises

Gordon Johnson – who has been critical of the camera-only approach of the EV maker for years – believes that ‘FSD does not work,’ thus making it impossible for Musk to fulfil his promises.

To further reinforce his argument, the Wall Street expert highlighted a series of previous broken promises, overtly mentioning the forecast that there would be ‘a million robotaxis on the road by 2020,’ the 2016 claim ‘that a Tesla car would drive itself coast to coast in 2yrs,’ ‘ the $35K model 3,’ and several others.

Could Tesla stock suffer the fate of Nikola EV trucks?

Perhaps the most damning example provided by Johnson involves the infamous 2016 ‘Paint it Black’ video that claimed to show an autonomous vehicle but was, according to numerous reports, faked.

The incident is of particular note since it represents an uncomfortable parallel with the now-bankrupt electric truck company Nikola, which, in 2018, faked a video to exaggerate the power of its vehicles by having them roll downhill while using camera angles to obfuscate the slope.

Wall Street remains confident Tesla stock will evade a crash

Elsewhere, it is worth noting that Gordon Johnson has a history of making exceptionally bearish forecasts for Tesla stock, and if many of Elon Musk’s promises went nowhere, TSLA shares also never crashed near GJL Research’s 12-month price targets.

Most of Wall Street remains confident a crash will not come for the EV maker and, per the data Finbold retrieved from TipRanks on March 16, the car company’s equity is overall rated as a ‘Hold.’ Similarly, Tesla stock is, on average, expected to hit $399.25 in the coming 12 months.

Wall Street sets Tesla stock price target for the next 12 months. Source: TipRanks

GJL Research’s own most recent TSLA price target would have it fall to $25.28, while Johnson’s comments about FSD accounting for 80% of the EV maker’s valuation imply a collapse to $78.88 in less than 12 months.

Similarly, even if the analyst is correct in estimating that ‘FSD does not work,’ Tesla has so far evaded most possible consequences of failing to fulfill Musk’s promises. 

On the other hand, however, the company’s recent trend of declining deliveries, paired with other bearish pressures, does increase the risk that investors might finally lose patience in 2026, barring a material breakthrough.

Featured image via Shutterstock

Source: https://finbold.com/wall-street-expert-predicts-80-tesla-stock-crash-in-2026/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

And the Big Day Has Arrived: The Anticipated News for XRP and Dogecoin Tomorrow

And the Big Day Has Arrived: The Anticipated News for XRP and Dogecoin Tomorrow

The first-ever ETFs for XRP and Dogecoin are expected to launch in the US tomorrow. Here's what you need to know. Continue Reading: And the Big Day Has Arrived: The Anticipated News for XRP and Dogecoin Tomorrow
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 04:33
Swiss Franc Intervention: Critical Analysis of SNB’s 2025 Policy and Safe-Haven Resilience

Swiss Franc Intervention: Critical Analysis of SNB’s 2025 Policy and Safe-Haven Resilience

BitcoinWorld Swiss Franc Intervention: Critical Analysis of SNB’s 2025 Policy and Safe-Haven Resilience ZURICH, March 2025 – The Swiss National Bank faces mounting
Share
bitcoinworld2026/03/16 23:10
Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

The post Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. “It’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress,” writes Pipes. Getty Images Washington is addicted to taxing success. Now, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is floating a plan to skim half the patent earnings from inventions developed at universities with federal funding. It’s being sold as a way to shore up programs like Social Security. In reality, it’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress. Yes, taxpayer dollars support early-stage research. But the real payoff comes later—in the jobs created, cures discovered, and industries launched when universities and private industry turn those discoveries into real products. By comparison, the sums at stake in patent licensing are trivial. Universities collectively earn only about $3.6 billion annually in patent income—less than the federal government spends on Social Security in a single day. Even confiscating half would barely register against a $6 trillion federal budget. And yet the damage from such a policy would be anything but trivial. The true return on taxpayer investment isn’t in licensing checks sent to Washington, but in the downstream economic activity that federally supported research unleashes. Thanks to the bipartisan Bayh-Dole Act of 1980, universities and private industry have powerful incentives to translate early-stage discoveries into real-world products. Before Bayh-Dole, the government hoarded patents from federally funded research, and fewer than 5% were ever licensed. Once universities could own and license their own inventions, innovation exploded. The result has been one of the best returns on investment in government history. Since 1996, university research has added nearly $2 trillion to U.S. industrial output, supported 6.5 million jobs, and launched more than 19,000 startups. Those companies pay…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 03:26