No one entity should control the truth, especially when they’re doing it to cover up the Epstein Files.The Federal Communications Commission was established inNo one entity should control the truth, especially when they’re doing it to cover up the Epstein Files.The Federal Communications Commission was established in

This traitorous Trump plot is filtering into your home

2026/03/24 17:30
5 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

No one entity should control the truth, especially when they’re doing it to cover up the Epstein Files.

The Federal Communications Commission was established in 1934 to regulate our airwaves (radio, broadcast television, wire, satellite, and cable), both at home and around the world.

“Regulate” does a lot of heavy lifting there. From making sure sensitive government information about World War II didn’t get into the mainstream to keeping the airwaves swear-free, the FCC’s oversight has always determined what does and doesn’t get heard and seen. But it was never meant to regulate news broadcasts to help protect a president who’s committed unspeakable crimes against humanity.

Their power was famously summed up in George Carlin’s classic “7 Dirty Words You Can’t Say on TV” bit. It’s still pretty much true, although broadcast TV has figured out plenty of ways to work around the restrictions, pushing the envelope as far as it can.

Those of us who grew up in the pre-Internet era never could have imagined someone like Heritage Foundation stooge Brendan Carr being installed to control information via multiple corporate media mergers and acquisitions. Which is weird, because during Trump’s first administration, Carr still had a grasp on how the First Amendment works.

Yeah, I wonder what’s changed in the last seven years?

No one could have imagined anything like what we’re witnessing when President Bill Clinton signed the Telecommunications Act of 1996, a massive overhaul of what was seen as an antiquated system. While it “aimed to eliminate monopolies in local telephone service, allowing competition and deregulation to reduce consumer costs,” it actually allowed corporations to own multiple radio and TV stations in multiple cities across the country. This led to mergers between corporations, enriching the already rich, who then got to decide what content went out over the frequencies they had bought.

That’s why anyone listening to the radio in the mid-'90s suddenly started hearing a lot of the same music across the dials, no matter where they lived. More than one station in the same market could be playing the same playlists, dividing audiences while creating monopolies. The formerly powerful DJs who decided what made it onto the air were reduced to following corporate playlists packed with artists from labels with whom they had relationships. It was payola without it being exactly payola, when record label execs could still expense trips and send swag to radio stations to make sure their artists got extra airtime.

This led to radio companies losing money and then merging, and why we now have iHeart Media, Audacy, and Cumulus dominating the corporate-owned frequencies, drowning out local and community stations, and homogenizing music to the point where it all becomes like an audible McDonald’s. No matter where you are in America, the radio will now sound the same instead of giving you a local vibe.

Most significantly, it’s why right-wing talk radio exploded on the AM dial and still dominates it today. Those greedy guys at companies like Sinclair gobbled up those cheap little frequencies nobody wanted and flooded the airwaves with propaganda. The one liberal attempt to capture an audience in the same way — ah, Air America, you were so ahead of your time — was pushed out by the monopoly of what is now MAGA.

In 1996, no one could have imagined a traitor would be placed in charge at CBS News. Bari Weiss has already killed stories on 60 Minutes and scorched the earth of the news division. Now she’s pulled the entire plus on CBS Radio.

As a former alternative radio DJ, this topic is very close to my heart. I’m a GenX kid who grew up in New Jersey, and all of my earliest musical memories are tied to the New York radio stations. My first on-air gig was in 1993, when the music was still on CDs, and I recorded commercial spots on reel-to-reel, which I then physically cut with a razor blade to edit and then transfer to an 8-track cart to play on the air.

By the time I landed my dream gig on KNRK (“94/7 Alternative Portland”) in Portland, Oregon, in 2004, radio was enjoying what would be its final glory years. Everything had been computerized by then, so a station could save tons of money by essentially being a jukebox without the need for humans to tell the audience what they just heard, and the concept of voicetracking (one person in one studio in one city being broadcast to multiple stations wherever the company owned frequencies) wasn’t too far off.

During the five years I was on the air, I warned my bosses about the combination of iPods, Satellite Radio, and the internet demolishing any power terrestrial radio had left. I was sadly right about that, because no one cares about radio anymore the way I do.

That’s why I was extra worried when I learned about what Project 2025 had planned for the FCC, as well as the Voice of America ( least KKKari Lake is being deregulated, shall we say).

I spent a lot of 2024 screaming into the abyss (and directly at Brendan Carr on Twitter) about the dangers of Trump controlling the airwaves. I think you’ve all seen enough to know that “NosTARAdamus” was right about that, too.

But all is not lost, thanks to Democrats.

Oregon State AG Dan Rayfield is suing to block a merger that would leave my city, Portland, with three of our four major local stations owned by media companies that have caved to Trump. Seven other states also filed motions for temporary restraining orders a day after Brendan Carr’s compromised FCC approved Nexstar’s $6.2 billion purchase of its rival, Tegna. And more states need to get in on this ASAP, because Trump’s control of the media needs to be not just stopped, but undone.

Market Opportunity
OFFICIAL TRUMP Logo
OFFICIAL TRUMP Price(TRUMP)
$3.26
$3.26$3.26
+0.52%
USD
OFFICIAL TRUMP (TRUMP) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Tags:

You May Also Like

VanEck Targets Stablecoins & Next-Gen ICOs

VanEck Targets Stablecoins & Next-Gen ICOs

The post VanEck Targets Stablecoins & Next-Gen ICOs appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Welcome to the US Crypto News Morning Briefing—your essential rundown of the most important developments in crypto for the day ahead. Grab a coffee because the firms shaping crypto’s future are not just building products, but also trying to reshape how capital flows. Crypto News of the Day: VanEck Maps Next Frontier of Crypto Venture Investing VanEck, a Wall Street player known for financial “firsts,” is pushing that legacy into Web3. The firsts include pioneering US gold funds and launching one of the earliest spot Bitcoin ETFs. Sponsored Sponsored “Financial instruments have always been a kind of tokenization. From seashells to traveler’s checks, from relational databases to today’s on-chain assets. You could even joke that VanEck’s first gold mutual funds were the original ‘tokenized gold,’” Juan C. Lopez, General Partner at VanEck Ventures, told BeInCrypto. That same instinct drives the firm’s venture bets. Lopez said VanEck goes beyond writing checks and brings the full weight of the firm. This extends from regulatory proximity to product experiments to founders building the next phase of crypto infrastructure. Asked about key investment priorities, Lopez highlighted stablecoins. “We care deeply about three questions: How do we accelerate stablecoin ubiquity? What will users want to do with them once highly distributed? And what net new assets can we construct now that we have sophisticated market infrastructure?” Lopez added. However, VanEck is not limiting itself to the hottest narrative, acknowledging that decentralized finance (DeFi) is having a renaissance. The VanEck executive also noted that success will depend on new approaches to identity and programmable compliance layered on public blockchains. Backing Legion With A New Model for ICOs Sponsored Sponsored That compliance-first angle explains VanEck Ventures’ recent co-lead of Legion’s $5 million seed round alongside Brevan Howard. Legion aims to reinvent token fundraising by making early-stage access…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 03:52
Weaker as conflict risk eases – MUFG

Weaker as conflict risk eases – MUFG

The post Weaker as conflict risk eases – MUFG appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. MUFG’s Senior Currency Analyst Lee Hardman notes the US Dollar remains under
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/03/24 18:23
Layer 2 Projects Social Activity Soars: Linea Outpaces Rivals with 3M+ Record Interactions

Layer 2 Projects Social Activity Soars: Linea Outpaces Rivals with 3M+ Record Interactions

The discussion is now focused on layer 2 projects, which are quicker, less expensive and more scalable to users. Linea is leading with record interactions.
Share
Blockchainreporter2025/09/18 04:20