A quick look at the eight contenders for the Solana spot ETF

2025/06/22 10:30

Author: Blockworks

Compiled by: Felix, PANews

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) approval of a spot Solana exchange-traded fund (ETF) appears to be in the final stages, with an initial group of seven potential issuers filing revised S-1 filings in recent days and a new entrant, CoinShares, joining the fray.

Notably, each document includes references to pledges, which, as previously reported, is required by the SEC to be included by issuers.

As the crypto industry prepares for a third possible SEC-approved crypto ETF, here are the eight companies that have applied to launch a Solana ETF, ranked in order of first filing:

VanEck

VanEck was the first company to file for a Solana ETF about a year ago this month. At the time, some compared the filing to a call option on Trump’s victory in the November election, despite the SEC’s insistence that Solana was a security.

The bet paid off, but it could be a Pyrrhic victory if the SEC follows its precedent and approves bitcoin and ethereum exchange-traded funds (ETFs) simultaneously, rather than in the order in which they were submitted.

The bet paid off, but it could be a Pyrrhic victory if the SEC follows precedent and approves bitcoin and ether ETFs all at once, rather than in the order in which issuers first file.

To this end, VanEck has been advocating that the SEC adopt a "first-to-file" principle, believing that this is more conducive to innovation and competition.

VanEck taps Kiln to provide Solana staking services for its European exchange-traded products (ETPs).

Related reading: Institutional entry, tokenized stocks and liquidity changes: VanEck investment managers look forward to the future of the crypto market

21Shares

Two days after VanEck’s application, 21Shares also submitted an application for the Solana ETF, and it also hopes that the SEC will adopt the “first to file” principle.

21Shares’ planned Core Solana ETF will trade on the Cboe BZX exchange, and redemptions will be made in the form of SOL tokens.

Coinbase is listed as a staking services provider mentioned in 21Shares’ base prospectus filed in Europe.

Related reading: Spot ETF will be launched as early as July. Can Solana repeat the BTC script?

Canary Capital

Canary Capital filed for the SOL ETF just days before the U.S. election.

Canary Capital is smaller than some of the funds on this list, but has recently gained notoriety for filing for a variety of altcoin ETFs, including SUI, SEI, INJ, TRX, PENGU, HBAR, LTC, and XRP.

Related reading: Canary Capital frequently submits ETF applications. Has the copycat ETF application become a disguised advertising business?

Bitwise

Bitwise first filed for an exchange-traded fund (ETF) shortly after Trump’s election. In an interview, the company’s CEO Hunter Horsley called Solana an “incredible emerging asset and story.”

Bitwise also launched a Solana-based collateralized ETP in December, with Marinade providing collateral services. If the U.S. approves collateralized ETFs, this could bode well for Marinade.

Related reading: Bitwise Chief Investment Officer: Former skeptics now want to buy BTC

Grayscale

Grayscale is looking to convert its SOL Trust into a spot ETF, similar to how it does with its Bitcoin and Ethereum Trusts. Currently, the GSOL Trust is trading at a premium to its net asset value, meaning investors are willing to pay a higher price for the product than the underlying SOL.

Last month, the SEC delayed its decision on Grayscale’s exchange-traded fund (ETF), saying it had “not reached any conclusion” on the 19b-4 filing for the proposed spot SOL ETF.

Related reading: Grayscale's latest report: Q1 inventory performed poorly, Q2 focuses on RWA, DePIN and IP tokenization

Franklin Templeton

Franklin Templeton Investments offers exchange-traded funds (ETFs) for Bitcoin and Ethereum, and has filed paperwork for exchange-traded funds (ETFs) for SOL and XRP.

The $1.5 trillion fund has other crypto initiatives, including a small allocation to SOL in its Digital Asset Core SMA. Its Tokenized Money Market Fund also added support for Solana earlier this year.

The $1.5 trillion fund has also invested in a number of other crypto projects, and its crypto separately managed accounts (SMAs) have a small allocation to SOL. Its tokenized money market fund also gained support from Solana earlier this year.

Related reading: Behind the “undervalued” Solana DeFi: How to break the “ecological internal friction” between high-yield staking and lending agreements?

Fidelity

In the current competition, Fidelity is the giant. The assets under management of its Bitcoin exchange-traded fund (ETF) are second only to BlackRock, and the assets under management of its Ethereum ETF lag behind BlackRock and Grayscale's Switch Trust.

Fidelity, a major provider of brokerage, trust and individual retirement accounts, will likely be a key driver of inflows into an approved SOL exchange-traded fund (ETF).

Related reading: The current state of the alt-ETF boom: a detailed look at crypto ETF applications for 2025

CoinShares

CoinShares is the latest to join the race for a Solana exchange-traded fund (ETF), joining the fray as existing issuers race to file amended S-1 forms.

This European asset management company focusing on cryptocurrencies has currently launched an ETP for BTC, ETH and a series of altcoins - Tezos ETP. Does anyone want to try it?

The European cryptocurrency-focused asset manager has launched exchange-traded products (ETPs) for BTC, ETH, and a range of altcoins.

Related reading: Solana spot ETF has made substantial progress again, SEC focuses on evaluating the pledge and redemption mechanism, and will be implemented as early as July

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights

You May Also Like

Looking at the L2 dilemma from Linea’s coin issuance: Has Ethereum’s expansion path reached a dead end?

Looking at the L2 dilemma from Linea’s coin issuance: Has Ethereum’s expansion path reached a dead end?

Original: Odaily Planet Daily Author: Wenser "Do you know how I have been through these past three years?" This may be the voice of many users who have participated in Linea interactions. After three years, Linea, the Layer 2 (L2) network under Consensys, a prominent Ethereum orthodox faction, is finally about to hold its TGE. However, judging by the current airdrop amount and Linea's pre-market price, it's unlikely to satisfy heavily invested enthusiasts. Some claim to have invested hundreds of thousands of dollars, only to receive airdropped tokens worth only a few thousand dollars, or even less. Thus, after a period of hype and constant mention of Layer 2, the Ethereum network may have entered a phase where Layer 2 is losing public support. After several years of development, the "L2 technology path" once singled out by Ethereum founder Vitalik Buterin may have become a detour in the Ethereum ecosystem's development. This article, Odaily Planet Daily, explores this perspective through the lens of Linea's token launch and the current state of mainstream L2 networks, inviting readers to engage in critical discussion. Where the dream begins According to the original idea of Ethereum founder Vitalik, the L2 network is a network system built on the basis of inheriting the security of the Ethereum main network, used to expand the Ethereum ecosystem and reduce usage costs. In October 2020, Vitalik elaborated on the technical concept of the L2 route in the article "Rollup-centric Ethereum Roadmap" . Its core purpose is to simplify Ethereum's long-term expansion strategy and move computing execution mainly to L2 solutions (such as Rollup), so as to quickly achieve network scalability while alleviating the high gas fees and congestion problems of the main network at the time. In addition, he mentioned the short-term actions and potential impact of this technical route: "We need to do more work on cross-L2 transfers to make the experience of moving assets between different L2s as close to instant and seamless as possible." "It is necessary for L2 projects to launch their own tokens - of course, the premise is that the tokens have real economic value (that is, the future fees captured by the L2 estimate). As a result, these L2 network-related protocols will be able to earn fees/MEV, thereby directly or indirectly (through supporting tokens to fund development) to fund their development. In the long run, this is a strategic move that is beneficial to the long-term economic sustainability of Ethereum." Linea is about to issue a coin, but L2 activity is not as high as before At present, among the major L2 networks, only Arbitrum and Base have performed well in value capture. The price of the former's token is mediocre, just like other L2 tokens. The latter has no intention of releasing native tokens and mainly relies on sorter income to generate revenue, earn network development fees and feed back to Coinbase. According to data from TheBlock , on September 9, the number of transactions on Base alone (seven-day average) reached 11.56 million, the number of transactions on Arbitrum was 2.36 million, the number of transactions on Optimism was 1.15 million, the number of transactions on Blast was only 344,000, and the number of transactions on Mode Network was only 233,000; among the ZK-based L2 networks, Starknet had the most transactions (585,000), and the transaction numbers of the remaining networks, from most to least, were Linea (211,000), Scroll (76,000), ZKSync Era (25,000), Polygon zkEVM (4,000), and Loopring (250). In terms of the average daily number of active addresses , taking September 9 as an example, Base (seven-day average) in the Optimism L2 network was far ahead with 1.09 million addresses. The remaining networks and their corresponding address numbers were: Arbitrum (384,000); Optimism (72,000); Mode Network (3,450); Zora (3,440); and Blast (2,800). The performance of the ZK-based L2 network is also disappointing. On September 9 , perhaps benefiting from the impact of the upcoming TGE, the average daily active addresses of the Linea network increased to 56,000, a drop of more than 90% compared to the average daily active addresses of about 750,000 in July 2024; the average daily active addresses of the remaining L2 networks all remained below 50,000: Starknet (about 40,000); ZKSync Era (about 9,200); Scroll (about 6,300); Polygon zkEVM (about 1,200); Loopring had only a rather bleak 18 active addresses. Furthermore, while the explosion of L2 networks has improved the efficiency of the Ethereum ecosystem to a certain extent, it has also provided a breeding ground for frequent protocol security incidents within the ecosystem. Furthermore, after the gradual implementation of EIP proposals to optimize gas fees, such as EIP-1559 and EIP-7999, gas costs on the Ethereum mainnet have been significantly reduced, and transfer and transaction efficiency has far exceeded previous levels. Therefore, after several years of L2 development, people have come to realize that the core proposition for the Ethereum ecosystem is: First, does the Ethereum ecosystem have the goal of user retention and activity? Second, can Ethereum L2 network tokens achieve value capture? At present, the current situation in both aspects is not optimistic. The path to value breakthrough for the Ethereum ecosystem: stablecoins and ETH treasury reserves Judging from the results, the L2 route has still made a huge contribution to the development of the Ethereum ecosystem. In addition to saving a large amount of gas fees, the strategic value of L2 is mainly reflected in two aspects: First, the value of TVL (TVL) is significant . According to data from the l2beat website , as of September 10th, the total TVL of the Ethereum L2 network had grown to $54.7 billion. While this represents a decrease of over $10 billion from the $65.5 billion TVL in December of last year, it still provides more liquidity for the Ethereum ecosystem and ample funding for numerous protocols and projects within it. Second, seamless integration with traditional financial assets . Beyond crypto-native networks like Arbitrum and Optimism, traditional tech companies like Sony's L2 public chain Soneium, Alibaba's Ant Digits' RWA L2 public chain Jovay, and Robinhood's Arbitrum-based L2 public chain for trading tokenized stock products are also emerging. As a mature blockchain ecosystem with a decade of stable operation, Ethereum remains the best choice for traditional companies targeting the RWA market, and L2 networks provide a relatively stable and smooth entry window and channel bridge. From today’s perspective, the subsequent path for the Ethereum ecosystem to break through its value may still rely on its connection with the traditional financial sector and the coupling of assets on a wider scale. The former’s main medium is stablecoins, and subsequent development routes include PayFi, DePIN, cross-border trade, etc. The latter mainly relies on many listed companies to promote ETH treasury reserves to complete the tokenization and assetization of RWA assets such as stocks. Looking ahead to 2025, the 10th anniversary of the launch of the Ethereum mainnet, although most L2 networks have gradually become detritus in the long history of cryptocurrencies in the vicious cycle of "fundraising-issuing coins-disappearing", they have also become the soil and nutrients for nurturing new innovative products while becoming a "crypto bubble". Many L2 networks, including Linea, which has not issued coins for a long time, may have few ecological projects and sluggish token prices in the market, but they have also provided many technological updates and project products for the narrative boom in the crypto market. This may be an "industry bubble" when the crypto industry has developed to a certain stage, but it is by no means a so-called "industry black history." As to whether the Ethereum ecosystem can develop further, it may still take time to verify.
Share
PANews2025/09/11 14:00
Share