PANews reported on September 22nd that according to Lookonchain, 10 Bitcoin ETFs saw a net inflow of 1,949 BTC today, valued at approximately $221 million. BlackRock saw an inflow of 2,134 BTC, valued at approximately $242 million, and currently holds 767,127 BTC, valued at approximately $86.92 billion. Nine Ethereum ETFs saw a net inflow of 25,795 ETH, valued at approximately $108 million. BlackRock saw an inflow of 32,367 ETH, valued at approximately $136 million, and currently holds 3,834,660 ETH, valued at approximately $16.12 billion.PANews reported on September 22nd that according to Lookonchain, 10 Bitcoin ETFs saw a net inflow of 1,949 BTC today, valued at approximately $221 million. BlackRock saw an inflow of 2,134 BTC, valued at approximately $242 million, and currently holds 767,127 BTC, valued at approximately $86.92 billion. Nine Ethereum ETFs saw a net inflow of 25,795 ETH, valued at approximately $108 million. BlackRock saw an inflow of 32,367 ETH, valued at approximately $136 million, and currently holds 3,834,660 ETH, valued at approximately $16.12 billion.

Bitcoin ETFs saw a net inflow of 1,949 BTC today, while Ethereum ETFs saw a net inflow of 25,795 ETH.

2025/09/22 22:27

PANews reported on September 22nd that according to Lookonchain, 10 Bitcoin ETFs saw a net inflow of 1,949 BTC today, valued at approximately $221 million. BlackRock saw an inflow of 2,134 BTC, valued at approximately $242 million, and currently holds 767,127 BTC, valued at approximately $86.92 billion. Nine Ethereum ETFs saw a net inflow of 25,795 ETH, valued at approximately $108 million. BlackRock saw an inflow of 32,367 ETH, valued at approximately $136 million, and currently holds 3,834,660 ETH, valued at approximately $16.12 billion.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
Share