BlockDAG Leads the Presale Crypto List vs BlockchainFX, Maxi Doge & Neo Pepe

2025/09/11 10:53

Crypto presales remain one of the most followed parts of the market, as they allow early backers to secure positions before tokens reach exchanges. The challenge is knowing which projects have staying power and which are built on hype alone. Right now, four names stand out: BlockDAG, BlockchainFX, Maxi Doge, and Neo Pepe. Each offers something different, from global mining networks to meme-driven communities.

Among them, BlockDAG has clearly pulled ahead. With $403M raised, millions of users already active, and partnerships expanding across crypto and mainstream platforms, it holds the lead on the presale crypto list. Let’s look at how each project compares.

1. BlockDAG – Execution With Global Scale

BlockDAG has redefined what a presale can achieve. More than 19,600 miners have already shipped, with logistics scaling to 2,000 additional units each week. The X1 mobile app now counts over 3 million daily users. Together, these create the largest decentralized mining network operating before a mainnet launch.

The presale rollback has also fueled demand. Despite Batch 30 pricing coins at $0.03, BlockDAG (BDAG) has locked in a final entry point of $0.0013 until October 1. This decision has triggered whale buys worth $4.4M and $3.6M, showing confidence from both retail and large-scale buyers. Nearly 25.9B coins have been sold to more than 312,000 holders, with early participants seeing returns of 2,900% since Batch 1.

Beyond numbers, the ecosystem is active. BlockDAG integrates with Uniswap, Axelar, and Rarable, with an NFT marketplace being built alongside Rarable. Hackathons are funding developers with USDT and BDAG, while the Explorer, Dashboard V4, Academy, and TRADEBDAG trading module give users live tools. Sponsorships with sports stars and global billboards push BlockDAG beyond crypto audiences, strengthening brand reach.

BlockDAG is making a bold statement with a Deployment Event in Singapore, a move that marks the next big step in its global roadmap.

By combining presale fundraising, active adoption, and working infrastructure, BlockDAG tops the presale crypto list. It is already operating like a full network, setting a high bar for what presales can deliver before launch.

2. BlockchainFX – Utility and Market Growth

BlockchainFX positions itself as a utility-focused project with long-term aims. The presale has raised over $6.5M from 7,500+ participants, with coins priced at $0.022 and a launch target of $0.05. This suggests more than double upside for early buyers. Some analysts compare its model to BNB and Tron because of its scalability goals and planned integrations.

What makes BlockchainFX attractive is its balance between affordability and credibility. With a clear roadmap and emphasis on user applications, it’s showing that presales can build trust step by step. While it doesn’t yet have BlockDAG’s scale, its steady delivery gives it a place on the presale crypto list for those seeking utility-driven plays.

3. Maxi Doge – Meme Power With Energy

Maxi Doge approaches the market through bold meme branding. With about $1.7M raised so far, it is gaining traction among retail buyers who prefer high-risk opportunities. Its staking rewards of 2,513% APY are designed to attract attention and create buzz.

The project’s branding is built around humor and a “gym-bro” identity, aiming to stand out in the meme coin space. Media coverage has already listed it as one of the month’s trending picks, even alongside more established tokens. While it cannot match BlockDAG’s execution or BlockchainFX’s utility, its high-energy approach ensures visibility. For meme fans, Maxi Doge is one of the more distinctive names on the presale crypto list this year.

4. Neo Pepe – Structure Meets Meme Culture

Neo Pepe seeks to merge meme appeal with structured development. In Stage 4 of its presale, priced at $0.08, the project follows a 16-stage rollout that builds value gradually. With features like automated liquidity and governance tools, it is designed to bring more stability to meme-driven communities.

Its focus is on giving holders governance power while retaining meme identity. While it lacks the reach of BlockDAG or BlockchainFX, Neo Pepe could attract niche supporters who want meme projects with longer-term planning. By layering structure on top of culture, it earns a spot on the presale crypto list as a slower but potentially resilient meme entry.

Wrapping Up

Presales remain the space where high risk and high reward meet, and September’s lineup has delivered some standout projects. BlockchainFX is focusing on long-term utility with steady progress, Maxi Doge adds meme-driven buzz with extreme staking rewards, and Neo Pepe blends culture with structure through its staged rollout. Each has its strengths, but none match BlockDAG’s scale.

With $403 million raised, 25.9B coins sold, over 312,000 holders, and more than 3M active miners, BlockDAG is already proving adoption before launch. Its rollback price of $0.0013 until October 1, alongside global sponsorships and working tools, cements its lead. For anyone exploring the presale crypto list, BlockDAG stands as the clear frontrunner, turning early interest into real-world traction.

Disclaimer: The text above is an advertorial article that is not part of Coincu.com editorial content.

Source: https://coincu.com/pr/blockdag-leads-the-presale-crypto-list-vs-blockchainfx-maxi-doge-neo-pepe/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights

You May Also Like

Looking at the L2 dilemma from Linea’s coin issuance: Has Ethereum’s expansion path reached a dead end?

Looking at the L2 dilemma from Linea’s coin issuance: Has Ethereum’s expansion path reached a dead end?

Original: Odaily Planet Daily Author: Wenser "Do you know how I have been through these past three years?" This may be the voice of many users who have participated in Linea interactions. After three years, Linea, the Layer 2 (L2) network under Consensys, a prominent Ethereum orthodox faction, is finally about to hold its TGE. However, judging by the current airdrop amount and Linea's pre-market price, it's unlikely to satisfy heavily invested enthusiasts. Some claim to have invested hundreds of thousands of dollars, only to receive airdropped tokens worth only a few thousand dollars, or even less. Thus, after a period of hype and constant mention of Layer 2, the Ethereum network may have entered a phase where Layer 2 is losing public support. After several years of development, the "L2 technology path" once singled out by Ethereum founder Vitalik Buterin may have become a detour in the Ethereum ecosystem's development. This article, Odaily Planet Daily, explores this perspective through the lens of Linea's token launch and the current state of mainstream L2 networks, inviting readers to engage in critical discussion. Where the dream begins According to the original idea of Ethereum founder Vitalik, the L2 network is a network system built on the basis of inheriting the security of the Ethereum main network, used to expand the Ethereum ecosystem and reduce usage costs. In October 2020, Vitalik elaborated on the technical concept of the L2 route in the article "Rollup-centric Ethereum Roadmap" . Its core purpose is to simplify Ethereum's long-term expansion strategy and move computing execution mainly to L2 solutions (such as Rollup), so as to quickly achieve network scalability while alleviating the high gas fees and congestion problems of the main network at the time. In addition, he mentioned the short-term actions and potential impact of this technical route: "We need to do more work on cross-L2 transfers to make the experience of moving assets between different L2s as close to instant and seamless as possible." "It is necessary for L2 projects to launch their own tokens - of course, the premise is that the tokens have real economic value (that is, the future fees captured by the L2 estimate). As a result, these L2 network-related protocols will be able to earn fees/MEV, thereby directly or indirectly (through supporting tokens to fund development) to fund their development. In the long run, this is a strategic move that is beneficial to the long-term economic sustainability of Ethereum." Linea is about to issue a coin, but L2 activity is not as high as before At present, among the major L2 networks, only Arbitrum and Base have performed well in value capture. The price of the former's token is mediocre, just like other L2 tokens. The latter has no intention of releasing native tokens and mainly relies on sorter income to generate revenue, earn network development fees and feed back to Coinbase. According to data from TheBlock , on September 9, the number of transactions on Base alone (seven-day average) reached 11.56 million, the number of transactions on Arbitrum was 2.36 million, the number of transactions on Optimism was 1.15 million, the number of transactions on Blast was only 344,000, and the number of transactions on Mode Network was only 233,000; among the ZK-based L2 networks, Starknet had the most transactions (585,000), and the transaction numbers of the remaining networks, from most to least, were Linea (211,000), Scroll (76,000), ZKSync Era (25,000), Polygon zkEVM (4,000), and Loopring (250). In terms of the average daily number of active addresses , taking September 9 as an example, Base (seven-day average) in the Optimism L2 network was far ahead with 1.09 million addresses. The remaining networks and their corresponding address numbers were: Arbitrum (384,000); Optimism (72,000); Mode Network (3,450); Zora (3,440); and Blast (2,800). The performance of the ZK-based L2 network is also disappointing. On September 9 , perhaps benefiting from the impact of the upcoming TGE, the average daily active addresses of the Linea network increased to 56,000, a drop of more than 90% compared to the average daily active addresses of about 750,000 in July 2024; the average daily active addresses of the remaining L2 networks all remained below 50,000: Starknet (about 40,000); ZKSync Era (about 9,200); Scroll (about 6,300); Polygon zkEVM (about 1,200); Loopring had only a rather bleak 18 active addresses. Furthermore, while the explosion of L2 networks has improved the efficiency of the Ethereum ecosystem to a certain extent, it has also provided a breeding ground for frequent protocol security incidents within the ecosystem. Furthermore, after the gradual implementation of EIP proposals to optimize gas fees, such as EIP-1559 and EIP-7999, gas costs on the Ethereum mainnet have been significantly reduced, and transfer and transaction efficiency has far exceeded previous levels. Therefore, after several years of L2 development, people have come to realize that the core proposition for the Ethereum ecosystem is: First, does the Ethereum ecosystem have the goal of user retention and activity? Second, can Ethereum L2 network tokens achieve value capture? At present, the current situation in both aspects is not optimistic. The path to value breakthrough for the Ethereum ecosystem: stablecoins and ETH treasury reserves Judging from the results, the L2 route has still made a huge contribution to the development of the Ethereum ecosystem. In addition to saving a large amount of gas fees, the strategic value of L2 is mainly reflected in two aspects: First, the value of TVL (TVL) is significant . According to data from the l2beat website , as of September 10th, the total TVL of the Ethereum L2 network had grown to $54.7 billion. While this represents a decrease of over $10 billion from the $65.5 billion TVL in December of last year, it still provides more liquidity for the Ethereum ecosystem and ample funding for numerous protocols and projects within it. Second, seamless integration with traditional financial assets . Beyond crypto-native networks like Arbitrum and Optimism, traditional tech companies like Sony's L2 public chain Soneium, Alibaba's Ant Digits' RWA L2 public chain Jovay, and Robinhood's Arbitrum-based L2 public chain for trading tokenized stock products are also emerging. As a mature blockchain ecosystem with a decade of stable operation, Ethereum remains the best choice for traditional companies targeting the RWA market, and L2 networks provide a relatively stable and smooth entry window and channel bridge. From today’s perspective, the subsequent path for the Ethereum ecosystem to break through its value may still rely on its connection with the traditional financial sector and the coupling of assets on a wider scale. The former’s main medium is stablecoins, and subsequent development routes include PayFi, DePIN, cross-border trade, etc. The latter mainly relies on many listed companies to promote ETH treasury reserves to complete the tokenization and assetization of RWA assets such as stocks. Looking ahead to 2025, the 10th anniversary of the launch of the Ethereum mainnet, although most L2 networks have gradually become detritus in the long history of cryptocurrencies in the vicious cycle of "fundraising-issuing coins-disappearing", they have also become the soil and nutrients for nurturing new innovative products while becoming a "crypto bubble". Many L2 networks, including Linea, which has not issued coins for a long time, may have few ecological projects and sluggish token prices in the market, but they have also provided many technological updates and project products for the narrative boom in the crypto market. This may be an "industry bubble" when the crypto industry has developed to a certain stage, but it is by no means a so-called "industry black history." As to whether the Ethereum ecosystem can develop further, it may still take time to verify.
Share
PANews2025/09/11 14:00
Share