Cheaper Crypto Exposure? Hong Kong Banks Eye Relief Under New Capital Plan

2025/09/11 21:34

TLDR:

  • Hong Kong issues draft CRP-1 to set crypto capital rules, targeting early 2026 implementation for local banks.
  • Proposal offers lower capital charges for public blockchain assets with proper risk controls in place.
  • Basel crypto standards guide the new framework to bring clarity and uniformity to banking supervision.
  • Public consultation invites feedback from banks before finalizing the crypto asset classification module.

Hong Kong has taken a big step toward giving banks more clarity on holding crypto. Regulators released a new proposal aimed at updating capital rules for digital assets. 

The move is meant to make banking supervision more consistent with international standards. Local banks and industry groups now have a chance to review the draft and send feedback. The final version is expected to take effect early next year.

Draft Rules Target Crypto Capital Requirements

The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) issued a draft module called CRP-1 on September 8, 2025 according to reports. The document, part of the Banking Supervisory Policy Manual, sets out how crypto assets should be classified under new capital rules.

Caixin reported that the proposal is designed to bring Hong Kong in line with Basel Committee crypto regulations. Those global standards aim to ensure banks have enough capital when holding or trading digital assets.

Under the draft, banks may apply lower capital charges to crypto assets on permissionless blockchains if proper risk controls are in place. These controls include measures for preventing fraud, managing volatility, and responding to technical risks.

Faith, a partner at King & Wood Mallesons and a law lecturer at the University of Hong Kong, said the draft focuses on balancing risk with innovation. She noted that lowering capital requirements could improve bank participation in cryptocurrency markets while keeping safeguards intact.

Consultation and Next Steps for Implementation

The HKMA is seeking public feedback before finalizing the rules. Banks, legal experts, and cryptocurrency industry players can submit comments on the draft.

Once consultation ends, the HKMA will review submissions and make adjustments. The final version is scheduled for rollout in early 2026.

This approach mirrors global efforts to create consistent oversight for crypto exposure in the banking system. It also gives banks more clarity about how much capital they need to set aside for different types of digital assets.

The move could increase institutional participation in crypto by reducing uncertainty over regulatory treatment. Market participants will watch closely to see whether these rules lead to higher adoption of crypto services by Hong Kong banks.

The post Cheaper Crypto Exposure? Hong Kong Banks Eye Relief Under New Capital Plan appeared first on Blockonomi.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights

You May Also Like

Chinese Bitcoin Hardware Titans Control 95% of Market, Now Coming to America to Dodge Trump Tariff War

Chinese Bitcoin Hardware Titans Control 95% of Market, Now Coming to America to Dodge Trump Tariff War

Three of China’s largest Bitcoin hardware manufacturers are establishing production facilities in the United States as President Donald Trump’s tariff policies reshape the cryptocurrency industry. The three industry leaders, Bitmain, Canaan, and MicroBT, collectively control over 90% of the global mining rig market. These companies are the architects of Bitcoin’s physical infrastructure, manufacturing the specialized ASIC (Application-Specific Integrated Circuit) machines that form the backbone of the world’s most valuable cryptocurrency network. Every Bitcoin mined globally likely passes through hardware bearing Chinese engineering fingerprints. 95% Market Control Sparks “Digital Dependency Trap” and Security Risks According to a June 18 Reuters report, these Bitcoin mining giants are establishing U.S. operations to circumvent potential tariffs. However, critics have raised security concerns about Chinese involvement in sectors spanning semiconductor manufacturing and energy infrastructure. Guang Yang, chief technology officer at crypto technology provider Conflux Network, described the situation as extending beyond trade policy. “The U.S.-China trade war goes beyond tariffs,” Yang stated. “It’s a strategic pivot toward ‘politically acceptable’ hardware sources.” Bitmain, the largest of the three companies by revenue, initiated U.S. production of mining equipment in December , one month after Trump’s presidential election victory. Canaan began trial production in the United States on April 2 to avoid tariffs following Trump’s announcement of new trade levies. One of the largest manufacturers of #bitcoin mining machines, Canaan, has set up a base of operations outside of China. CEO Zhang says, Kazakhstan is essential to "expanding after-sales geographical coverage and providing […] support growing international customer base" pic.twitter.com/7D5Xh2ici5 — Documenting ₿itcoin 📄 (@DocumentingBTC) June 23, 2021 Third-ranked MicroBT announced in a statement that it is “actively implementing a localization strategy in the U.S.” to “avoid the impact of tariffs.” $11.9B by 2028: The Market These Giants Are Fighting for According to Frost & Sullivan’s “2024 Global Blockchain Hardware Industry White Paper,” the ASIC-based Bitcoin mining hardware market demonstrates substantial consolidation. When measured by computing power sold, these three Chinese companies command 95.4% of the global market share. The Bitcoin ecosystem encompasses five primary segments: hardware supply, mining farm operations, mining pool management, trading platforms, and payment processing services. Hardware manufacturers like Canaan, the first Bitcoin mining company to go public and the second-largest by computing power , focus exclusively on integrated circuit (IC) design, manufacturing, and equipment sales. Industry analysts project continued sector expansion, with the market expected to reach $11.9 billion by 2028, representing a compound annual growth rate of 15.3%, contingent on Bitcoin’s continued price appreciation driven by supply scarcity. Source: Frost & Sullivan China’s Historical Bitcoin Mining Advantage Understanding today’s migration requires examining how China achieved such overwhelming market control in the first place. The foundation was laid during the historic 2017 Bitcoin boom, when three key factors aligned to create Chinese mining supremacy. During the early expansion phase, Chinese officials recognized cryptocurrency mining as a profitable venture that attracted substantial foreign investment. Consequently, authorities initially overlooked the mining sector while simultaneously restricting Bitcoin trading and initial coin offerings. Hydro-power plants go on sale in China since #Bitcoin mining crackdown has reduced demand for electricity. – South China Morning Post pic.twitter.com/QKEbUzWN4g — Bitcoin Archive (@BTC_Archive) June 30, 2021 China’s extensive hydroelectric infrastructure further strengthened the country’s mining operations, providing the cheap energy essential for profitable Bitcoin production. Does Chinese Hardware Control America’s Bitcoin Network? While the United States leads global Bitcoin mining operations with over 38% of total network activity , American miners depend almost entirely on Chinese-manufactured equipment. America Leads Bitcoin Mining Operation/ Source: Bitbo This creates what security analysts describe as a “digital dependency trap,” a scenario where America’s cryptocurrency infrastructure relies fundamentally on hardware produced by its primary economic rival. Guang Yang, Conflux Network’s chief technology officer, frames this dependency in geopolitical terms that extend far beyond trade economics . “The U.S.-China trade war goes beyond tariffs,” Yang explains. “It’s a strategic pivot toward ‘politically acceptable’ hardware sources.” His assessment reflects growing concerns within the cryptocurrency community about supply chain vulnerabilities that could impact national economic security.
Share
CryptoNews2025/06/19 04:26
Share