Elon Musk has announced the creation of a new knowledge resource he calls “Grokipedia.” The tech giant has said that it will be a massive improvement over Wikipedia. Grokipedia will be built using Musk’s artificial intelligence company, xAI. In an X post, Musk said, “Frankly, it is a necessary step towards the xAI goal of […]Elon Musk has announced the creation of a new knowledge resource he calls “Grokipedia.” The tech giant has said that it will be a massive improvement over Wikipedia. Grokipedia will be built using Musk’s artificial intelligence company, xAI. In an X post, Musk said, “Frankly, it is a necessary step towards the xAI goal of […]

Elon Musk renews Wikipedia feud, pitches xAI's Grokipedia as massive improvement

2025/10/01 00:34

Elon Musk has announced the creation of a new knowledge resource he calls “Grokipedia.” The tech giant has said that it will be a massive improvement over Wikipedia.

Grokipedia will be built using Musk’s artificial intelligence company, xAI. In an X post, Musk said, “Frankly, it is a necessary step towards the xAI goal of understanding the Universe.”

Musk previously stated that xAI is already incorporating tools into its Grok chatbot that will automatically identify mistakes in online content and rewrite them into more accurate entries. 

According to the tech billionaire, Grok’s “synthetic corrections” could become the foundation for an alternative database to Wikipedia, one designed to strip out errors, omissions, and what he views as ideological bias.

If realized, Grokipedia would represent one of the most direct challenges yet to the world’s largest crowdsourced encyclopedia.

David Sacks encourages Musk to rewrite Wikipedia

Musk brought up Grokipedia again after David Sack proposed a new market opportunity for artificial intelligence to rewrite Wikipedia by integrating previously banned sources.

According to Sacks, “Wikipedia is hopelessly biased. An army of left-wing activists maintain the bios and fights reasonable corrections. Magnifying the problem, Wikipedia often appears first in Google search results, and now it’s a trusted source for AI model training. This is a huge problem.”

Sacks’ suggestion was motivated by an interview with Tucker Carlson, where Wikipedia co-founder Larry Sanger guided him through the site’s blacklist. “Red means it’s blacklisted,” he said. “You cannot cite it as a source of facts, maybe as a source of opinion, but generally that works out.”

According to Sanger, using public discussion and consensus, Wikipedia has a page called Perennial Sources that sorts sources into groups based on how reliable they are said to be. The New York Times, The Washington Post, CNN, The Nation, Mother Jones, and GLAAD are among the publications that have Wikipedia’s approval.

On the other hand, the blacklisted sources include Breitbart News, The Daily Caller, The Epoch Times, Fox News, The New York Post, and The Federalist. “So, you can’t use those as sources on Wikipedia,” Sanger said.

However, AI is likely to have some challenges. A 2024 study showed chatbots deliver strong performance on simple fact-based queries but struggle with complex “why” and “how” questions. Problems included faulty reasoning, technical inaccuracies, and the inability to cite valid references.

Musk’s feud with Wikipedia

It’s not the first time Musk has criticized Wikipedia. After a disagreement over the term “recession” led to more than 180 edits in only one week in 2022, he went on to accuse the platform of bias.

A year down the road, he got into an online feud with Jimmy Wales, the founder of Wikipedia, over transparency and neutrality.

In October 2024, Musk promised to pay $1 billion to Wikipedia in exchange for changing its name to “Dickipedia.” In December 2024, he was already urging users to stop donating to the site after a far-right X account claimed that the Wikimedia Foundation devotes $50 million a year to diversity and inclusion projects.

The confrontation has escalated since Trump took office. Elon Musk renewed his feud with Wikipedia when the website included his gesture during Trump’s inauguration, which many have equated to the Nazi salute. 

While Musk was not formally accused of doing a Nazi salute, he did flag the organization as far-left, previously referring to it as “Wokepedia.” X Musk urged people to “defund Wikipedia until balance is restored!”

The way Musk’s biography is presented on Wikipedia has also been a point of public contention for the billionaire. Since he would rather have attention focused on his leadership positions, he once asked that editors remove the term “investor” from his page.

At the same time, using AI has caused some upheaval on Wikipedia. The Wikimedia Foundation stopped experimenting with AI-generated summaries in June 2025 after editors strongly objected.

Join a premium crypto trading community free for 30 days - normally $100/mo.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights

You May Also Like

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

The post Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. “It’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress,” writes Pipes. Getty Images Washington is addicted to taxing success. Now, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is floating a plan to skim half the patent earnings from inventions developed at universities with federal funding. It’s being sold as a way to shore up programs like Social Security. In reality, it’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress. Yes, taxpayer dollars support early-stage research. But the real payoff comes later—in the jobs created, cures discovered, and industries launched when universities and private industry turn those discoveries into real products. By comparison, the sums at stake in patent licensing are trivial. Universities collectively earn only about $3.6 billion annually in patent income—less than the federal government spends on Social Security in a single day. Even confiscating half would barely register against a $6 trillion federal budget. And yet the damage from such a policy would be anything but trivial. The true return on taxpayer investment isn’t in licensing checks sent to Washington, but in the downstream economic activity that federally supported research unleashes. Thanks to the bipartisan Bayh-Dole Act of 1980, universities and private industry have powerful incentives to translate early-stage discoveries into real-world products. Before Bayh-Dole, the government hoarded patents from federally funded research, and fewer than 5% were ever licensed. Once universities could own and license their own inventions, innovation exploded. The result has been one of the best returns on investment in government history. Since 1996, university research has added nearly $2 trillion to U.S. industrial output, supported 6.5 million jobs, and launched more than 19,000 startups. Those companies pay…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 03:26
Share
Bitcoin Exchange Balance Drops To Six-Year Low Amid Shortage

Bitcoin Exchange Balance Drops To Six-Year Low Amid Shortage

The post Bitcoin Exchange Balance Drops To Six-Year Low Amid Shortage appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The amount of Bitcoin held on centralized exchanges plunged to a six-year low as the asset climbed to a new all-time high. Bitcoin notched a new all-time high on Sunday morning, reaching a little over $125,700 on Coinbase, according to Tradingview. Its previous peak was $124,500 on Coinbase on Aug. 14. Bitcoin (BTC) pulled back by 13.5% by Sept. 1 but has recovered strongly over the past week as “Uptober” began.    “Bitcoin hits new all-time high … And most people still don’t even know what Bitcoin is,” commented Nova Dius President Nate Geraci. “If Bitcoin is able to convincingly break $126,500, then chances are price will go a lot higher and quickly,” said analyst Rekt Capital on Saturday, before the latest price peak. BTC prices reach a new peak above $125,000. Source: Tradingview Exchange balances drop to six-year low The total Bitcoin balance on centralized exchanges fell to a six-year low of 2.83 million BTC on Saturday, according to Glassnode. The last time that there were fewer coins stored on exchanges was early June 2019, when the asset was trading around $8,000 in the depths of a bear market. Blockchain analytics platform CryptoQuant has a slightly lower total exchange reserve figure of 2.45 million BTC, which puts it at a seven-year low.  Both platforms show that the BTC exchange balance has dropped sharply over the past couple of weeks. More than 114,000 BTC worth over $14 billion has left exchanges over the past fortnight, according to Glassnode. When Bitcoin moves off centralized exchanges into self-custody, institutional funds, or digital asset treasuries, it suggests holders are planning to keep their coins long-term rather than sell them. Bitcoin sitting on exchanges is considered “available supply” that could be liquidated and hit the market at any moment. BTC balance on exchanges dropped to…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/10/06 14:29
Share