Perplexity offers publishers cut of revenue to cover content use in AI search

2025/08/26 23:19

AI search startup Perplexity has announced its plan to share its revenue among publishers after accusations of ripping content. According to Chief Executive Officer Aravind Srinivas, the company has allocated $42.5 million in revenue with media outlets.

In the new program, publishers will earn when their content receives web traffic through Perplexity’s Comet internet browser, appears in search queries on Comet and when it’s used to complete tasks by Comet’s AI assistant.

Aravind Srinivas said, “AI is helping to create a better internet, but publishers still need to get paid […] So we think this is actually the right solution, and we’re happy to make adjustments along the way.”

Perplexity’s new standard for compensation

Publishers complain that AI Overviews have cut valuable web traffic to their sites. However, Jessica Chan, head of publisher partnerships at Perplexity, said in an interview that the traditional model where media outlets rely on web traffic and clicks is “an old model.” 

Their solution is to create a new standard for compensation. The deal is to give publishers 80% of the revenue while Perplexity keeps the other 20%. 

Srinivas said that the plan to create revenue is through Comet Plus, a new Comet browser subscription level similar to Apple Inc.’s Apple News+. Customers will pay $5 a month to get a hand-picked content selection from the publishers in Perplexity’s new program.

This positions Perplexity as the first AI startup to come up with a new way to share revenue depending on how often content is used. AI businesses like OpenAI and Google have made custom multimillion-dollar arrangements with big publishers to license and distribute material.

Chan said that Perplexity is in talks with several media partners. The startup has previously worked with companies including Time, the Los Angeles Times, and Fortune to share ad revenue.

Pending lawsuits with publishers

Some media companies, like Forbes and Condé Nast, have had problems with Perplexity, saying that the business used their content in AI news summaries without authorization. Last week, the AI startup lost a request to have a copyright infringement case brought by News Corp.’s Dow Jones and the New York Post thrown out.

However, the company says it is confident that AI companies will win all the lawsuits. Perplexity spokesperson Jesse Dwyer said in a statement. “We look forward to settling the law on this early on, so that everyone can benefit from AI.” The 80% deal is one way of helping the company make amends.

In addition, Cloudflare, a business that works in cybersecurity, also said that Perplexity was crawling and collecting data from websites by getting over restrictions that were meant to protect against this activity.  

However, the company claims that its AI assistant isn’t crawling the web; instead, it only goes to specific websites when a user asks. Because of this, it shouldn’t have to follow the same regulations.

Srinivas added, “That’s different from a web crawler,” which downloads information and uses it to build a new AI model.

Meanwhile, the AI firm is determined to become as big as Google.  Previously, as reported by Cryptopolitan, it made a $34.5 billion offer to acquire Google’s Chrome browser, as the search giant faces a potential requirement to sell the web tool in US antitrust proceedings. While some critics dismissed the bid as unserious, Srinivas said that Perplexity has well-funded people who want to back them.

KEY Difference Wire: the secret tool crypto projects use to get guaranteed media coverage

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights

You May Also Like

Rinse, Rug, Repeat: Deconstructing the Modern Memecoin Playboo

Rinse, Rug, Repeat: Deconstructing the Modern Memecoin Playboo

rom the vantage point of seven years across exchanges, media, and infrastructure in this space, you learn to recognize patterns. The technology evolves, the narratives shift, but the cycles of human greed remain remarkably consistent. We are currently in a cycle dominated by celebrity-endorsed memecoins, a frothy, dangerous casino that promises generational wealth but often delivers systemic exploitation. And if you’ve been on the losing end, you’ve likely contributed to the profits of operators who have mastered this new, predatory playbook. To understand this system, we need to look no further than the on-chain trail of Hayden Davis, also known as Kelsier of Kelsier Ventures. His alleged activities provide a perfect blueprint for how insiders weaponize hype, manipulate nascent markets, and drain liquidity, leaving retail investors as the final bagholders. This isn’t just about one person; it’s about a repeatable model that betrays the first principles of Web3. The Anatomy of the Hunt The playbook is both simple and devastatingly effective. It has three core phases: Infiltration and Pre-Positioning: The operator gains proximity to a major cultural figure — a politician, a musician, a celebrity. Before any public announcement, a network of insider wallets acquires a significant portion of the token supply at virtually zero cost. This is the critical, unseen setup. We saw this with the $MELANIA token, where Davis himself admitted to shaping the launch strategy, while on-chain data later revealed a cohort of wallets loading up moments before the public could. Manufacturing Legitimacy and Hype: The token is launched, wrapped in the borrowed credibility of the celebrity. In the case of the $LIBRA token, linked to Argentine President Javier Milei, Davis went as far as positioning himself as a “blockchain and AI advisor” to the president. This creates a powerful narrative that overrides traditional due diligence. Retail investors see a famous name and rush in, creating the parabolic price surge the insiders were waiting for. The Exit: As public buying reaches a fever pitch, the insiders execute their exit with brutal precision. They dump their pre-mined tokens into the market, crashing the price. In the most egregious cases, like the $LIBRA collapse where the market cap bled $4.6 billion in six hours, the team goes a step further by pulling tens of millions in USDC and SOL directly from the liquidity pool. The game is over. Insiders walk away with fortunes; the public is left with a worthless asset and a painful lesson. The Cycle Continues This is not a historical account. The cycle is accelerating. The latest analysis from on-chain forensics platform Bubblemaps suggests the same operator may have just run this playbook on the $YZY token, launched by Kanye West, to the tune of a $12 million profit in a single night. The names change, but the mechanics remain the same. A celebrity’s cultural capital is converted into market hype, which is then systematically drained by insiders who were positioned from the start. A Betrayal of First Principles What makes this cycle so corrosive is that it uses the very tools of Web3 — decentralized exchanges, permissionless token creation, and public ledgers — to perpetrate the oldest forms of financial manipulation. The promise of Web3 was to create fairer, more transparent systems. Instead, in the memecoin arena, transparency has merely given us a clearer view of the crime after it has occurred. As an industry, we must decide what we want to be. Will we continue to celebrate these short-term, extractive cycles, or will we build systems resilient to them? Until we prioritize sustainable value over manufactured hype, the playbook will be run again and again. The only question is who the next celebrity will be, and how many more retail investors will become their exit liquidity. Rinse, Rug, Repeat: Deconstructing the Modern Memecoin Playboo was originally published in Coinmonks on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story
Share
Medium2025/08/26 23:43
Share