The post Polkadot community votes on pUSD stablecoin proposal appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Polkadot has opened voting on DOT-backed pUSD amid strong support and sharp criticism. The previous failed aUSD stablecoin project raises doubts over governance and technical trust. Polkadot founder Gavin Wood is pushing the stablecoin strategy to steady validator rewards. The Polkadot community is weighing one of its most consequential proposals to date, a plan to launch a native stablecoin backed entirely by DOT tokens. Known as pUSD, the project is being debated through an on-chain referendum that has quickly attracted strong interest, passionate support, and sharp criticism in equal measure. Polkadot’s push for a native stablecoin The proposal was introduced by Bryan Chen, co-founder and chief technology officer of Acala, through RFC-155. The proposal aims to deploy a DOT-backed stablecoin on Polkadot’s Asset Hub, utilising the Honzon protocol. For reference, Honzon previously powered Acala’s failed aUSD stablecoin, a connection that has fueled both technical optimism and community mistrust. Chen has argued that Polkadot must have a native, decentralised stablecoin to reduce reliance on USDT and USDC, which dominate the ecosystem with a combined market share of more than $74 million. Without such a move, Chen warned, the network risks losing liquidity and strategic advantages to competing chains that already feature their own native stablecoins. At the time of writing, more than 74.6% of votes are cast in favour of the measure, though it has not yet reached the 79.7% approval threshold required for passage. Over $5.6 million worth of DOT, amounting to more than 1.4 million tokens, has already been committed to the vote. The vote remains open for another three weeks, ensuring that the outcome is far from certain. Acala’s memories and community doubts While the case for a DOT-backed stablecoin is clear to many, memories of Acala’s collapse in 2022 still hang over the debate. Acala’s aUSD project… The post Polkadot community votes on pUSD stablecoin proposal appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Polkadot has opened voting on DOT-backed pUSD amid strong support and sharp criticism. The previous failed aUSD stablecoin project raises doubts over governance and technical trust. Polkadot founder Gavin Wood is pushing the stablecoin strategy to steady validator rewards. The Polkadot community is weighing one of its most consequential proposals to date, a plan to launch a native stablecoin backed entirely by DOT tokens. Known as pUSD, the project is being debated through an on-chain referendum that has quickly attracted strong interest, passionate support, and sharp criticism in equal measure. Polkadot’s push for a native stablecoin The proposal was introduced by Bryan Chen, co-founder and chief technology officer of Acala, through RFC-155. The proposal aims to deploy a DOT-backed stablecoin on Polkadot’s Asset Hub, utilising the Honzon protocol. For reference, Honzon previously powered Acala’s failed aUSD stablecoin, a connection that has fueled both technical optimism and community mistrust. Chen has argued that Polkadot must have a native, decentralised stablecoin to reduce reliance on USDT and USDC, which dominate the ecosystem with a combined market share of more than $74 million. Without such a move, Chen warned, the network risks losing liquidity and strategic advantages to competing chains that already feature their own native stablecoins. At the time of writing, more than 74.6% of votes are cast in favour of the measure, though it has not yet reached the 79.7% approval threshold required for passage. Over $5.6 million worth of DOT, amounting to more than 1.4 million tokens, has already been committed to the vote. The vote remains open for another three weeks, ensuring that the outcome is far from certain. Acala’s memories and community doubts While the case for a DOT-backed stablecoin is clear to many, memories of Acala’s collapse in 2022 still hang over the debate. Acala’s aUSD project…

Polkadot community votes on pUSD stablecoin proposal

2025/09/30 04:30
  • Polkadot has opened voting on DOT-backed pUSD amid strong support and sharp criticism.
  • The previous failed aUSD stablecoin project raises doubts over governance and technical trust.
  • Polkadot founder Gavin Wood is pushing the stablecoin strategy to steady validator rewards.

The Polkadot community is weighing one of its most consequential proposals to date, a plan to launch a native stablecoin backed entirely by DOT tokens.

Known as pUSD, the project is being debated through an on-chain referendum that has quickly attracted strong interest, passionate support, and sharp criticism in equal measure.

Polkadot’s push for a native stablecoin

The proposal was introduced by Bryan Chen, co-founder and chief technology officer of Acala, through RFC-155.

The proposal aims to deploy a DOT-backed stablecoin on Polkadot’s Asset Hub, utilising the Honzon protocol.

For reference, Honzon previously powered Acala’s failed aUSD stablecoin, a connection that has fueled both technical optimism and community mistrust.

Chen has argued that Polkadot must have a native, decentralised stablecoin to reduce reliance on USDT and USDC, which dominate the ecosystem with a combined market share of more than $74 million.

Without such a move, Chen warned, the network risks losing liquidity and strategic advantages to competing chains that already feature their own native stablecoins.

At the time of writing, more than 74.6% of votes are cast in favour of the measure, though it has not yet reached the 79.7% approval threshold required for passage.

Over $5.6 million worth of DOT, amounting to more than 1.4 million tokens, has already been committed to the vote.

The vote remains open for another three weeks, ensuring that the outcome is far from certain.

Acala’s memories and community doubts

While the case for a DOT-backed stablecoin is clear to many, memories of Acala’s collapse in 2022 still hang over the debate.

Acala’s aUSD project was crippled after an exploit, leading to a loss of trust and financial damage that rippled across the ecosystem.

Critics argue that no one involved with Acala should be tasked with launching another stablecoin, no matter the technical merits of the underlying protocol.

Some of the network’s most vocal participants have voted against the measure, pointing to the risk of repeating past mistakes.

The group known as TheGlobedotters stated that Acala should never again be entrusted with a strategic project of this scale, while others stressed the need for strict oversight from Polkadot’s Technical Fellowship before any stablecoin could be deployed.

The White Rabbit, another community member, opposed the proposal but suggested they could support it under conditions that explicitly exclude Acala from development and guarantee robust governance safeguards.

Gavin Wood outlines the broader vision for Polkadot

Polkadot founder Gavin Wood has added weight to the conversation by articulating a wider strategy for stablecoins within the ecosystem.

Earlier this month, Wood argued that Polkadot must pursue multiple approaches, including fully collateralised native stablecoins and what he termed “stable-ish” assets designed to reduce, but not eliminate, DOT’s volatility.

Wood also highlighted validator incentives as a key consideration. He has floated the idea of paying validators directly in a DOT-backed stablecoin such as pUSD, instead of volatile DOT rewards.

This shift, Wood argued, would stabilise validator income, attract institutional participants, and strengthen the network’s long-term security model.

Under the design, DOT would be used as collateral, and PUSD would be minted against it with liquidation mechanisms ensuring the peg remains intact.

Supporters say this could solve a long-standing problem of validator earnings fluctuating sharply as DOT’s price swings.

Source: https://coinjournal.net/news/polkadot-community-votes-on-pusd-stablecoin-proposal/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights

You May Also Like

CEO Sandeep Nailwal Shared Highlights About RWA on Polygon

CEO Sandeep Nailwal Shared Highlights About RWA on Polygon

The post CEO Sandeep Nailwal Shared Highlights About RWA on Polygon appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Polygon CEO Sandeep Nailwal highlighted Polygon’s lead in global bonds, Spiko US T-Bill, and Spiko Euro T-Bill. Polygon published an X post to share that its roadmap to GigaGas was still scaling. Sentiments around POL price were last seen to be bearish. Polygon CEO Sandeep Nailwal shared key pointers from the Dune and RWA.xyz report. These pertain to highlights about RWA on Polygon. Simultaneously, Polygon underlined its roadmap towards GigaGas. Sentiments around POL price were last seen fumbling under bearish emotions. Polygon CEO Sandeep Nailwal on Polygon RWA CEO Sandeep Nailwal highlighted three key points from the Dune and RWA.xyz report. The Chief Executive of Polygon maintained that Polygon PoS was hosting RWA TVL worth $1.13 billion across 269 assets plus 2,900 holders. Nailwal confirmed from the report that RWA was happening on Polygon. The Dune and https://t.co/W6WSFlHoQF report on RWA is out and it shows that RWA is happening on Polygon. Here are a few highlights: – Leading in Global Bonds: Polygon holds 62% share of tokenized global bonds (driven by Spiko’s euro MMF and Cashlink euro issues) – Spiko U.S.… — Sandeep | CEO, Polygon Foundation (※,※) (@sandeepnailwal) September 17, 2025 The X post published by Polygon CEO Sandeep Nailwal underlined that the ecosystem was leading in global bonds by holding a 62% share of tokenized global bonds. He further highlighted that Polygon was leading with Spiko US T-Bill at approximately 29% share of TVL along with Ethereum, adding that the ecosystem had more than 50% share in the number of holders. Finally, Sandeep highlighted from the report that there was a strong adoption for Spiko Euro T-Bill with 38% share of TVL. He added that 68% of returns were on Polygon across all the chains. Polygon Roadmap to GigaGas In a different update from Polygon, the community…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:10
Share
Ethereum applications at the On-chain Summit

Ethereum applications at the On-chain Summit

The post Ethereum applications at the On-chain Summit appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Ethereum applications dominated discussion today at the Global On-chain Asset Summit in Singapore, hosted by HashKey Group, where Vitalik Buterin and Dr. Xiao Feng outlined practical paths for scaling, identity and risk control on-chain. What was the main message from the summit about l1 l2 application differences? Speakers drew a clear line between Layer 1 and Layer 2 use cases. L1 remains the canonical base for settlement and shared security. L2s are framed as the layer for high throughput and lower fees. In this context, developers should design with cross-layer interoperability in mind. Applications that need finality and censorship resistance will favor L1. By contrast, high-frequency use cases — such as prediction markets and micropayments — gain from L2 throughput and reduced costs. How does this affect developers choosing where to deploy? Teams must weigh latency, fees and trust assumptions. Many prototype on L2, then shift critical settlement logic to L1 when guarantees matter. Tooling for bridging and observability is improving, which reduces migration friction. How did the speakers address ethereum prediction markets and their scaling? Panelists discussed the promise of ethereum prediction markets for price discovery and hedging. They underlined that such markets need fast finality and low fees to operate efficiently. As a result, builders plan to run market engines on L2 or rollups while anchoring outcomes on L1. This hybrid model preserves security and delivers the speed traders require. However, throughput targets and oracle designs remain under debate. Are there regulatory or market risks traders should watch? Yes. Speakers flagged regulatory scrutiny and liquidity fragmentation as material risks. Choosing venues with transparent on-chain settlement and reputable layers reduces counterparty exposure. What role will zk identity proofs play in on-chain user models? Experts positioned zk identity proofs as a core tool for privacy-preserving KYC, Sybil resistance and reputation…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/10/07 01:23
Share