This article explores how a simple change in the reference point can achieve a Pareto-efficient equilibrium in both free and fair economies and those with social justice.This article explores how a simple change in the reference point can achieve a Pareto-efficient equilibrium in both free and fair economies and those with social justice.

The Role of Reference Points in Achieving Equilibrium Efficiency in Fair and Socially Just Economies

2025/09/17 22:30

Abstract and 1. Introduction

  1. A free and fair economy: definition, existence and uniqueness

    2.1 A free economy

    2.2 A free and fair economy

  2. Equilibrium existence in a free and fair economy

    3.1 A free and fair economy as a strategic form game

    3.2 Existence of an equilibrium

  3. Equilibrium efficiency in a free and fair economy

  4. A free economy with social justice and inclusion

    5.1 Equilibrium existence and efficiency in a free economy with social justice

    5.2 Choosing a reference point to achieve equilibrium efficiency

  5. Some applications

    6.1 Teamwork: surplus distribution in a firm

    6.2 Contagion and self-enforcing lockdown in a networked economy

    6.3 Bias in academic publishing

    6.4 Exchange economies

  6. Contributions to the closely related literature

  7. Conclusion and References

Appendix

5.2 Choosing a reference point to achieve equilibrium efficiency

\

\ Remark that this result holds for any value of α, including for α = 1, which corresponds to a situation where the tax rate is zero. In that case, the entire surplus of the economy is distributed following the Shapley value. The analysis implies that if an economy can choose its reference point, it can always do so to lead to equilibrium efficiency.

\

:::info Authors:

(1) Ghislain H. Demeze-Jouatsa, Center for Mathematical Economics, University of Bielefeld (demeze jouatsa@uni-bielefeld.de);

(2) Roland Pongou, Department of Economics, University of Ottawa (rpongou@uottawa.ca);

(3) Jean-Baptiste Tondji, Department of Economics and Finance, The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley (jeanbaptiste.tondji@utrgv.edu).

:::


:::info This paper is available on arxiv under CC BY 4.0 DEED license.

:::

\

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights

You May Also Like

Has Bitcoin's four-year cycle really been broken?

Has Bitcoin's four-year cycle really been broken?

The cryptocurrency industry appears to be breaking with the traditional four-year cycle. The institutional adoption of exchange-traded funds, the tokenization of real-world assets, and the evolution of stablecoin infrastructure are reshaping the entire market. In a report released on September 24, an analyst using the pseudonym Ignas pointed out that the listing of Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs in 2024 will be a watershed event - since April, crypto ETFs have led all asset classes with a net inflow of $34 billion. These products have attracted the participation of pension funds, consulting firms and commercial banks, transforming cryptocurrencies from retail speculation targets to institutional allocation assets on par with gold and the Nasdaq index. Currently, the assets under management of Bitcoin ETFs have exceeded US$150 billion, accounting for 6% of the total BTC supply; Ethereum ETFs control 5.6% of ETH's circulation. The SEC’s adoption of universal listing standards for commodity ETPs in September accelerated this trend, paving the way for fund filings for assets such as Solana and XRP. The report calls this shift in ownership from retail investors to long-term institutional investors the "Great Rotation in Crypto Assets." While traditional cyclicalists are selling, institutional investors continue to accumulate, pushing the cost basis upward and forming a new price bottom. ETFs have become the primary purchasing channel for Bitcoin and Ethereum, fundamentally changing the supply conditions that drive historical cyclical patterns. Stablecoins have gone beyond the scope of trading tools and evolved into payment, lending and financial management functions. The $30 billion real-world asset (RWA) market is a reflection of this expansion, with tokenized treasuries, credit, and commodities building on-chain financial infrastructure. The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission recently approved stablecoins as collateral for derivatives, opening up institutional application scenarios beyond spot demand. Payment-oriented blockchain projects (such as Stripe’s Tempo and Tether’s Plasma) are driving the integration of stablecoins into the real economy, while digital asset treasury (DAT) companies are providing equity market access for tokens that have not yet been approved for ETFs. This mechanism not only provides exit liquidity for venture capital, but also introduces institutional funds into the altcoin market. The RWA tokenization, which establishes benchmark interest rates through government bonds and credit instruments, is building a real capital market on the chain. BlackRock's BUIDL and Franklin Templeton's BENJI act as bridges, connecting trillions of dollars of traditional capital to crypto infrastructure. This allows DeFi protocols to rely on legal collateral and lending markets, breaking away from the cycle of pure speculation. This structural shift signals that cryptocurrencies are evolving from cyclical speculative assets to permanent financial instruments. However, as institutional capital prefers sustainable business models rather than purely narrative-driven ones, individual performance differentiation may replace the general rise in prices.
Share
PANews2025/09/25 12:00
Share