The post Ukraine Gymnastics Withdraws In Protest From Paris World Challenge Cup appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Diana Lobok of Ukraine competes during the women’s balance beam qualifying round of the 17th FIG Artistic Gymnastics Apparatus World Cup in Doha, Qatar, April 17, 2025. (Photo by Nikku/Xinhua via Getty Images) Xinhua News Agency via Getty Images The Paris World Challenge Cup is a key competition in the final weeks before the World Gymnastics Championships in Jakarta, Indonesia, in October. Held September 12 through 14, the event hosts athletes from countless nations, with seven gymnasts from the Ukrainian Gymnastics Federation originally slated to compete. However, the competition will finish today without Ukrainians taking to the stage in Paris, due to the federation’s withdrawal of its nation’s athletes. Why? The Russian and Belarusian athletes’ inclusion at the event. The Ukrainian Gymnastics Federation shared their justification for the decision in the following statement posted on Instagram. “The Ukrainian Gymnastics Federation continues uncompromising fight against the intentions of the aggressor country to use the sport for propaganda purposes. Any participation of Russian gymnasts in international competitions, regardless of athletes’ presence of a status of neutrality, is threatened by using such participation to demonstrate recognition of the aggressor country as a civilized world. However, it is rare that the status of neutral is awarded to athletes who do not meet established neutrality criteria, as evidenced by the facts. Yes, many Russian gymnasts, including those with the status of a neutral athlete, are included in the list of “champions of terror”, as reflected on the website of the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine, namely: war-sanctions.gur.gov.ua . The Ukrainian Gymnastics Federation considers it unacceptable to participate in competitions where “champions of terror” participate. Certainly, the non-participation of Ukrainian gymnasts in international sports competitions causes some damage to the sports composition, which leaves a sickening siege in our gymnasts and coaches, who have done a… The post Ukraine Gymnastics Withdraws In Protest From Paris World Challenge Cup appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Diana Lobok of Ukraine competes during the women’s balance beam qualifying round of the 17th FIG Artistic Gymnastics Apparatus World Cup in Doha, Qatar, April 17, 2025. (Photo by Nikku/Xinhua via Getty Images) Xinhua News Agency via Getty Images The Paris World Challenge Cup is a key competition in the final weeks before the World Gymnastics Championships in Jakarta, Indonesia, in October. Held September 12 through 14, the event hosts athletes from countless nations, with seven gymnasts from the Ukrainian Gymnastics Federation originally slated to compete. However, the competition will finish today without Ukrainians taking to the stage in Paris, due to the federation’s withdrawal of its nation’s athletes. Why? The Russian and Belarusian athletes’ inclusion at the event. The Ukrainian Gymnastics Federation shared their justification for the decision in the following statement posted on Instagram. “The Ukrainian Gymnastics Federation continues uncompromising fight against the intentions of the aggressor country to use the sport for propaganda purposes. Any participation of Russian gymnasts in international competitions, regardless of athletes’ presence of a status of neutrality, is threatened by using such participation to demonstrate recognition of the aggressor country as a civilized world. However, it is rare that the status of neutral is awarded to athletes who do not meet established neutrality criteria, as evidenced by the facts. Yes, many Russian gymnasts, including those with the status of a neutral athlete, are included in the list of “champions of terror”, as reflected on the website of the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine, namely: war-sanctions.gur.gov.ua . The Ukrainian Gymnastics Federation considers it unacceptable to participate in competitions where “champions of terror” participate. Certainly, the non-participation of Ukrainian gymnasts in international sports competitions causes some damage to the sports composition, which leaves a sickening siege in our gymnasts and coaches, who have done a…

Ukraine Gymnastics Withdraws In Protest From Paris World Challenge Cup

2025/09/15 02:42

Diana Lobok of Ukraine competes during the women’s balance beam qualifying round of the 17th FIG Artistic Gymnastics Apparatus World Cup in Doha, Qatar, April 17, 2025. (Photo by Nikku/Xinhua via Getty Images)

Xinhua News Agency via Getty Images

The Paris World Challenge Cup is a key competition in the final weeks before the World Gymnastics Championships in Jakarta, Indonesia, in October. Held September 12 through 14, the event hosts athletes from countless nations, with seven gymnasts from the Ukrainian Gymnastics Federation originally slated to compete.

However, the competition will finish today without Ukrainians taking to the stage in Paris, due to the federation’s withdrawal of its nation’s athletes. Why? The Russian and Belarusian athletes’ inclusion at the event.

The Ukrainian Gymnastics Federation shared their justification for the decision in the following statement posted on Instagram.

Ukraine’s Warning Goes Unheeded

In August, the International Gymnastics Federation published its official registrant list for the event. The FIG confirmed the registration of five Russian or Belarusian gymnasts as authorized neutral athletes (AIN).

Their attendance in Paris marked their official return to international competition for the first time since 2021, following an FIG-instituted ban implemented in March 2022 due to Russia’s war in Ukraine. The ban was lifted on January 1, 2024. The FIG permitted their return, but only as “individual neutral athletes” (AIN) under strict conditions prohibiting national representation.

Their approval to compete this September generated significant uproar, with many alleging Angelina Melnikova’s participation, in particular, violates FIG rules. Melnikova, the 2021 World Champion and Olympic gold medalist, stood out as an egregious conclusion due to her political involvement.

Forbes‘Champion Of Terror’ To Compete: Ukraine Fights Russia’s Return To Gymnastics

The approvals contradict the International Gymnastics Federation’s (FIG) neutrality conditions detailed in their ad-hoc guidelines.

When I spoke with Ukrainian Gymnastics officials in August, the federation’s response was clear: the FIG’s decision was an ‘exact’ example of “Sportwashing.”

According to Cambridge Dictionary, Sportwashing is when sport — with all the positive feelings it inspires — is used to divert attention from social or environmental problems.”

At that time, Iryna Deriugina, President of the Ukrainian Gymnastics Federation, told me that the UGF would await action from the FIG regarding the Russian and Belarusian inclusion at the Paris competition.

However, she told me that if the FIG does not address the UGF’s allegations of sportwashing, Ukrainian athletes may withdraw from the event in “passive protest.”

Due to the FIG’s inaction regarding the Russian and Belarusian athletes’ participation at the event, the Ukrainian Gymnastics Federation withdrew its athletes, as confirmed by the absence from the competitive start lists on Friday.

Moving Forward To World Championships

The Ukrainian Gymnastics Federation’s withdrawal decision could reach a major international scale in October. With the FIG’s approval of Russian and Belarusian authorized neutral athletes in Paris, their participation at the upcoming World Championships seems likely.

Given the UGF’s commitment to contesting “sportswashing,” Ukraine’s refusal to compete in the sport’s premier competition emerges as a definite possibility.

Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/carolineprice/2025/09/14/ukraine-gymnastics-withdraws-in-protest-from-paris-world-challenge-cup/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights

You May Also Like

Is Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX) a strong mutual fund pick right now?

Is Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX) a strong mutual fund pick right now?

The post Is Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX) a strong mutual fund pick right now? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. On the lookout for a Sector – Tech fund? Starting with Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX – Free Report) should not be a possibility at this time. PGTAX possesses a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank of 4 (Sell), which is based on various forecasting factors like size, cost, and past performance. Objective We note that PGTAX is a Sector – Tech option, and this area is loaded with many options. Found in a wide number of industries such as semiconductors, software, internet, and networking, tech companies are everywhere. Thus, Sector – Tech mutual funds that invest in technology let investors own a stake in a notoriously volatile sector, but with a much more diversified approach. History of fund/manager Putnam Funds is based in Canton, MA, and is the manager of PGTAX. The Putnam Global Technology A made its debut in January of 2009 and PGTAX has managed to accumulate roughly $650.01 million in assets, as of the most recently available information. The fund is currently managed by Di Yao who has been in charge of the fund since December of 2012. Performance Obviously, what investors are looking for in these funds is strong performance relative to their peers. PGTAX has a 5-year annualized total return of 14.46%, and is in the middle third among its category peers. But if you are looking for a shorter time frame, it is also worth looking at its 3-year annualized total return of 27.02%, which places it in the middle third during this time-frame. It is important to note that the product’s returns may not reflect all its expenses. Any fees not reflected would lower the returns. Total returns do not reflect the fund’s [%] sale charge. If sales charges were included, total returns would have been lower. When looking at a fund’s performance, it…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 04:05
Share