The post OKX And Mantra Clash Over OM Token Price Manipulation Allegations appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. OKX and Mantra clash over OM token manipulation The post OKX And Mantra Clash Over OM Token Price Manipulation Allegations appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. OKX and Mantra clash over OM token manipulation

OKX And Mantra Clash Over OM Token Price Manipulation Allegations

2025/12/15 01:41

OKX and Mantra clash over OM token manipulation claims as token migration and regulatory investigations intensify.

A dispute between cryptocurrency exchange OKX and the Mantra project has escalated following allegations of price manipulation involving the OM token. The conflict centers on claims that coordinated accounts manipulated OM’s value using it as collateral for large USDT loans.

OKX claims to have acted in response to irregular trading behavior, while Mantra’s leadership demands complete transparency regarding token holdings and transaction practices.

Mantra CEO Seeks Token Transparency

Mantra CEO John Patrick Mullin responded to OKX’s allegations with an open letter, published on Twitter, requesting full disclosure from the exchange.

Mullin asked OKX to provide details on how many OM tokens belong to users versus what remains on the company’s balance sheet. He also addressed confusion over the upcoming OM token migration.

According to Mullin, the existing ERC-20 version of OM will be deprecated on January 15, 2026. After that, the token will undergo a protocol-level upgrade and a 1:4 token split.

Mullin clarified that users will not need to take action during this process, aiming to dispel concerns among token holders.

OKX Claims Coordinated Manipulation and Defends Actions

In its response, OKX rejected the claims made in Mullin’s letter and stated that it had acted to protect market integrity.

The exchange accused several accounts of coordinating to use OM as collateral for USDT borrowing, which it says led to artificial inflation of OM’s price. OKX’s internal risk team flagged the behavior and requested that the account holders adjust their positions, but received no cooperation.

Following these developments, OKX intervened by taking control of the involved accounts. The OM token experienced a sharp price drop soon after.

OKX stated that it had liquidated only a limited amount of OM and absorbed related losses using its Security Fund. The exchange also noted that external perpetual trading activity on OKX contributed to the price crash.

Related Reading: OKX Seychelles Settles with U.S. DOJ, Pays $84M Fine

OKX confirmed that it has submitted its findings and documentation to regulatory authorities and law enforcement.

It maintained that it followed all internal protocols and acted responsibly in response to suspicious activity. The exchange also questioned the origin of extensive OM holdings by some entities involved in the situation.

Despite OKX’s stance, Mullin has continued to call for further transparency. He believes the dispute stems from a lack of clarity around the OM token migration process and maintains that the public deserves more insight into OKX’s OM token management.

The matter remains under investigation, with both parties holding their positions amid ongoing legal processes.

Source: https://www.livebitcoinnews.com/okx-and-mantra-clash-over-om-token-price-manipulation-allegations/

Piyasa Fırsatı
Clash Logosu
Clash Fiyatı(CLASH)
$0,021692
$0,021692$0,021692
-%2,28
USD
Clash (CLASH) Canlı Fiyat Grafiği
Sorumluluk Reddi: Bu sitede yeniden yayınlanan makaleler, halka açık platformlardan alınmıştır ve yalnızca bilgilendirme amaçlıdır. MEXC'nin görüşlerini yansıtmayabilir. Tüm hakları telif sahiplerine aittir. Herhangi bir içeriğin üçüncü taraf haklarını ihlal ettiğini düşünüyorsanız, kaldırılması için lütfen service@support.mexc.com ile iletişime geçin. MEXC, içeriğin doğruluğu, eksiksizliği veya güncelliği konusunda hiçbir garanti vermez ve sağlanan bilgilere dayalı olarak alınan herhangi bir eylemden sorumlu değildir. İçerik, finansal, yasal veya diğer profesyonel tavsiye niteliğinde değildir ve MEXC tarafından bir tavsiye veya onay olarak değerlendirilmemelidir.

Ayrıca Şunları da Beğenebilirsiniz

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Paylaş
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
SOLANA NETWORK Withstands 6 Tbps DDoS Without Downtime

SOLANA NETWORK Withstands 6 Tbps DDoS Without Downtime

The post SOLANA NETWORK Withstands 6 Tbps DDoS Without Downtime appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In a pivotal week for crypto infrastructure, the Solana network
Paylaş
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/16 20:44
Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

The post Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Jordan Love and the Green Bay Packers are off to a 2-0 start. Getty Images The Green Bay Packers are, once again, one of the NFL’s better teams. The Cleveland Browns are, once again, one of the league’s doormats. It’s why unbeaten Green Bay (2-0) is a 8-point favorite at winless Cleveland (0-2) Sunday according to betmgm.com. The money line is also Green Bay -500. Most expect this to be a Packers’ rout, and it very well could be. But Green Bay knows taking anyone in this league for granted can prove costly. “I think if you look at their roster, the paper, who they have on that team, what they can do, they got a lot of talent and things can turn around quickly for them,” Packers safety Xavier McKinney said. “We just got to kind of keep that in mind and know we not just walking into something and they just going to lay down. That’s not what they going to do.” The Browns certainly haven’t laid down on defense. Far from. Cleveland is allowing an NFL-best 191.5 yards per game. The Browns gave up 141 yards to Cincinnati in Week 1, including just seven in the second half, but still lost, 17-16. Cleveland has given up an NFL-best 45.5 rushing yards per game and just 2.1 rushing yards per attempt. “The biggest thing is our defensive line is much, much improved over last year and I think we’ve got back to our personality,” defensive coordinator Jim Schwartz said recently. “When we play our best, our D-line leads us there as our engine.” The Browns rank third in the league in passing defense, allowing just 146.0 yards per game. Cleveland has also gone 30 straight games without allowing a 300-yard passer, the longest active streak in the NFL.…
Paylaş
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:41