The post Crypto.com hires market-making team to trade against customers on its prediction market appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Crypto.com is recruiting tradersThe post Crypto.com hires market-making team to trade against customers on its prediction market appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Crypto.com is recruiting traders

Crypto.com hires market-making team to trade against customers on its prediction market

Crypto.com is recruiting traders to operate an internal market-making desk for trading directly against customers on its prediction market exchange.

The Singapore-based company has posted a “quantitative trader” job listing, who will reportedly join a team responsible for buying and selling financial contracts of sporting events outcomes. 

According to Bloomberg’s Tuesday report, the role would require them to boost liquidity on Crypto.com’s prediction market trade contracts that pay out based on a specific event.

Crypto.com prediction market adds ‘conflict of interest’ job

Market making on prediction platforms is a controversial topic because, unlike sportsbooks, which set odds or profit from customer losses, they match opposing views in an open market. But opponents argue that internal trading desks are effectively placing the platform operator or its affiliates on the opposite side of customer trades.

Crypto.com is not the only prediction market to deploy in-house traders on its exchange. Kalshi, the second most popular decentralized prediction platform in the US, also has an internal unit known as Kalshi Trading. 

Cryptopolitan had reported in early December that new US-market entrant Polymarket is also building its own internal trading operation, confirmed by people familiar with the matter. The firm has supposedly been approaching traders with professional sports betting backgrounds about joining the team.

Detractors contend that the arrangements, arguing they would make prediction platforms operators benefit when customers lose. They might have enough ammo to support their case, owing to Crypto.com’s statement about how the successful candidate will “maximize profits while carefully managing risks,” so the internal desk is expected to generate trading gains.

A spokesperson for Crypto.com pushed back on the idea, saying the company does not “rely on proprietary trading as a source of revenue,” adding that its internal market maker “does not have access to proprietary data or customer order flow” ahead of other participants.

Despite those assurances, the digital currency exchange’s own rules indicate that market makers may receive sports-linked contracts with a three-second head start over retail traders placing wagers. 

Company says it has fully complied with the CFTC’s regulations

The Crypto.com spokesperson told Bloomberg its internal trading team’s derivatives activities are listed on its US platform and that the arrangement is “fully disclosed” to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, the purported regulator for event-based contracts in the United States.

“The bottom line for customers is more competition and liquidity on the platform creates a better overall experience,” the spokesperson surmised.

The 2016-founded trading platform was among the first prediction market companies to list sports contracts late last year. Kalshi later followed, and sports-linked wagers have since become the biggest source of trading activity on its platform. 

The market now includes companies like DraftKings Inc. and Flutter Entertainment Plc’s FanDuel, which also launched their own prediction market-style applications to have a piece of the cake.

Kalshi co-founder says market makers ‘bootstrap liquidity’

The debate over internal market making became a focal point in a proposed class action lawsuit filed in November against Kalshi and its affiliate, Kalshi Trading. Seven Kalshi users based in New York allege that Kalshi Trading sets betting lines that make it a “sportsbook without the required gaming licenses.” 

“When consumers place bets on Kalshi, they face off against money provided by a sophisticated market maker on the other side of the ledger. Market makers make it possible for consumers to place illegal, unregulated wagers ‘against the House,” the attorneys for the seven plaintiffs wrote.

However, Kalshi co-founder Luana Lopes Lara has publicly rejected those claims through social media, saying the lawsuit’s allegations were “false and reveal a fundamental misunderstanding of how prediction markets operate.”

“Kalshi is an exchange. It’s peer-to-peer, and there is no house. Anyone can place orders and trade against anyone else, whether it’s a person or an entity. Like any financial exchange, we have market makers that compete openly against each other and help bootstrap liquidity,” Lara wrote in a lengthy statement on X.

Lopes Lara also stated that Kalshi Trading is not profitable, bashing the sentiments that the affiliate exists to extract value from customer losses. She concluded her message stating that she “hopes the industry matures and decides to work together to achieve the full potential of prediction markets.”

Join a premium crypto trading community free for 30 days – normally $100/mo.

Source: https://www.cryptopolitan.com/crypto-com-hires-market-making-team/

Market Opportunity
Polytrade Logo
Polytrade Price(TRADE)
$0.05525
$0.05525$0.05525
+2.39%
USD
Polytrade (TRADE) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Egypt to invite investors for projects in ‘golden triangle’

Egypt to invite investors for projects in ‘golden triangle’

Egypt is preparing a list of projects to show potential investors in its promising “golden triangle” area, home to nearly half the Arab country’s gold deposits.
Share
Agbi2025/12/25 04:09
OpenVPP accused of falsely advertising cooperation with the US government; SEC commissioner clarifies no involvement

OpenVPP accused of falsely advertising cooperation with the US government; SEC commissioner clarifies no involvement

PANews reported on September 17th that on-chain sleuth ZachXBT tweeted that OpenVPP ( $OVPP ) announced this week that it was collaborating with the US government to advance energy tokenization. SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce subsequently responded, stating that the company does not collaborate with or endorse any private crypto projects. The OpenVPP team subsequently hid the response. Several crypto influencers have participated in promoting the project, and the accounts involved have been questioned as typical influencer accounts.
Share
PANews2025/09/17 23:58